In re Cellect Poses an Obvious Dilemma

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact

In August 2023, the Federal Circuit in In re Cellect held that in evaluating unpatentability for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) of a patent that has received patent term adjustment (PTA), the relevant date is the reference patent’s expiration date after PTA is added. 2 Cellect promptly filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A flood of amicus briefs in support of a rehearing ensued, filed by key players in the pharmaceutical industry including AbbVie, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson, among others. Although the petition was ultimately denied, this case has ongoing implications. These implications, together with additional cases that may yet be impactful, are summarized here.

Originally published in the Spring 2024 edition of Chemical Practice Chronicles.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide