Good News for Corporate Policyholders: Insurer Cannot Refuse Coverage Based on Insured's Assignment of Rights Under Policies After Loss Has Occurred -
Why it matters: Reversing its holding in a 2003 case, the Supreme...more
8/28/2015
/ Abatement ,
Asbestos Litigation ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Bad Faith ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Carbon Emissions ,
CERCLA ,
Clean Air Act ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Consent Decrees ,
Consent to Assignment ,
Cumis Counsel ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Defend ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Environmental Remediation Costs ,
FDIC ,
Fluor ,
Hartford Casualty Ins. ,
Hartford Insurance Company ,
Indemnification ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ,
Mitigation ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Receivership
Insured v. Insured Exclusion Ambiguous When Applied to FDIC, 11th Circuit Rules -
Why it matters:
In the continuing split among courts considering insured v. insured exclusions, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court...more
1/14/2015
/ Appeals ,
Banks ,
Class Action ,
Counterclaims ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Cooperate ,
Duty to Defend ,
Excessive Fees ,
FDIC ,
Litigation Fees & Costs ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Reservation of Rights ,
US Bank
Why it matters -
In the latest decision to weigh in on the scope of the Insured v. Insured exclusion, a California court has held that it is ambiguous as applied to suits brought by the FDIC, and therefore does not...more
Court’s Decision Prompts Policyholders to Seek Defense Quickly or Risk Awaiting Conclusion of Coverage Action to See Reimbursement -
Why it matters:
A policyholder who does not act promptly to seek advancement...more
10/23/2014
/ AIG ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Banks ,
Choice-of-Law ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Defend ,
FDIC ,
Insurance Industry ,
Late Notices ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Voluntary Payments
Washington Supreme Court Rules That It Was Error To Delay Adjudication Of Insurer’s Duty To Defend, But Should Stay Discovery As To Insurer’s Coverage Defenses -
Why it matters:
The Washington Supreme Court...more