Latest Publications

Share:

Defence & Indemnity - June 2017 : Insurance I. INSURANCE ISSUES D. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia v. Lloyds Underwriters,...

The “lessee” or “renter” of a leased or rented vehicle for the purposes of auto insurance priority legislation is determined on the basis of who the lease/rental company can look to for payment. Insurance Corp. of British...more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2017 : Insurance I. INSURANCE ISSUES C. Downer v. Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13, per Green, C.J.N.L. [4228]

C. The drivers of two cars involved in an accident privately made a settlement and release agreement, giving the Newfoundland Court of Appeal an opportunity to clarify the legal test for the doctrine of unconscionability....more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2017 : Insurance I. INSURANCE ISSUES B. Stairs v. CFM Corp., 2017 NBCA 8 [4226]

I. INSURANCE ISSUES B. In Alberta an insured’s settlement with a third party which releases the third party does not preclude the insured’s insurer from pursuing a subrogated claim against the third party. Elsewhere in...more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2017 : I. INSURANCE ISSUES A. Haraba v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company (The), 2017 ABQB 190, per...

I. INSURANCE ISSUES A. Insurance policies are to be interpreted how an ordinary person would understand them such that, absent clear policy wording to the contrary, the interests of co-insureds are to be considered several...more

An Owner May Lend a Vehicle with a Valid Prohibition Against Lending It to a Third Party

If you loan your vehicle to someone, can you impose a condition that they not lend it on to an unknown third party? In the decade since Mugford v. Weber, the law has been that owners cannot put conditions on their consent to...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: IV. PRACTICE ISSUES B.

In an action by homeowners against a chimney sweep, it was held that deficiencies in the plaintiffs’ expert Investigation and reports deprived the court and the other trial experts from being able to determine what actually...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: IV. PRACTICE ISSUES A.

IV. PRACTICE ISSUES A. The doctrine of abuse of process does not preclude re-litigation of the issue of whether or not an individual was insured in a priority dispute between insurers in the face of that individual’s having...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: III. QUANTUM/DAMAGES ISSUES

A. Regarding the defence of inevitable accident due to a medical condition, certain circumstances give rise to a presumption that the defendant drove negligently and the defendant needs expert medical evidence that causally...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: II. LIABILITY ISSUES

1. The Motions Judge (Dow, J.) set aside the Default Judgment awarding the Plaintiff thrown away costs of $10,000.00 and issued a publication ban on consent of all parties.   a. The Court summarized the factors to be...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: I. INSURANCE ISSUES B.

B. The wording “as a result of a peril insured against” in an insurance policy will be interpreted to include damage that happens as a direct result of the insured peril (increased cost to bring a damaged building up to code)...more

Defence & Indemnity - February 2017: I. INSURANCE ISSUES A.

I. INSURANCE ISSUES A. Where an insurer has failed to afford a defence to its insured and the insured is successful in bringing proceedings to enforce the insurer’s obligations, the court can and will award the insured a...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: V. SURETY AND BOND ISSUES

Alberta Court of Appeal confirms an obligee/trustee under labour and material payment bond has no legal duty to disclose the existence of such a bond to potential bond claimants until specifically asked about its...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: IV. PRACTICE ISSUES B.

The Plaintiff did not show a “want of diligence” in failing to take any proactive steps in discovering and naming the landlord of a nightclub as a defendant in a personal injury action five-and-a-half years after the...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: IV. PRACTICE ISSUES

Successful application to dismiss the plaintiffs’ action pursuant to Rule 4.33 on the basis that three or more years had passed without a significant advance in the action and the new 3-year drop dead Rule applies...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: III. QUANTUM/DAMAGES ISSUES

A. Ontario Court of Appeal upholds zero jury damage award regarding a crumbling skull plaintiff. Jugmohan v. Royle, 2016 ONCA 827...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: II. LIABILITY ISSUES B.

B. Where a contract for security services explicitly provides that it is not a contract for insurance and contains an enforceable liability exclusion clause, the security provider will not be liable for the loss. ...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: II. LIABILITY ISSUES

New privacy torts of intrusion upon seclusion and public disclosure of private facts were supported in Canada. R. v. John Doe, 2016 FCA 191, per Ryer J.A, Boivin J.A. and De Montigny J.A....more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: I. INSURANCE ISSUES B.

A vehicle owned by the insured or spouse, if insured, may be an “uninsured automobile” when taken without consent and therefore may be entitled to coverage under the O.P.C.F. 44R Endorsement as an “inadequately insured...more

Defence & Indemnity - December 2016: I. INSURANCE ISSUES A.

A. An insured killed by a thief driving the insured’s vehicle is entitled to coverage under his S.P.F. 44 Endorsement, notwithstanding that one part of the definition of “inadequately insured motorist” purports to exclude...more

Alberta Government Updating 2004 Auto Insurance Reforms

The Alberta government has announced that it is in the process of updating the regulations involved in the 2004 auto insurance reform, namely the Minor Injury Regulation, Alta Reg 123/2004; the Diagnostic and Treatment...more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2016: V. SURETY AND BOND ISSUES

Obligee's claim against surety can survive despite Obligee's claim against principal being unenforceable as a result of wording of completion agreement - HOOPP Realty Inc. v. The Guarantee Company of North America, 2015...more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2016: IV. PRACTICE ISSUES

The principles for extending the limitation period for filing Third Party Notices - Condominium Corporation No 0425636 v Amyotte’s Plumbing, 2015 ABQB 801, per Master Schulz...more

Defence & Indemnity - April 2016: III. QUANTUM/DAMAGES ISSUES: B.

The Court overtly accepted the Plaintiff’s expert testimony and criticized well-known defence experts with regard to whether the Plaintiff’s injuries were minor and whether fibromyalgia can be caused by trauma Jones v....more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2016: III. QUANTUM/DAMAGES ISSUES A.

A. Surveillance evidence significant in discrediting Plaintiff in large chronic pain case - Bumstead v. Dufresne, 2015 ABQB 787, per Horner, J. [4186] ...more

Defence & Indemnity - June 2016: II. LIABILITY ISSUES #3

Both the legal/registered owner and lessor and the beneficial owner and lessor of a vehicle are vicariously liable for the lessee’s vehicular negligence but only to the liability cap for lessors. Graham (Litigation...more

29 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.