Latest Posts › SCOTUS

Share:

"Supreme Court Holds No Presumption of Prudence for ESOP Fiduciaries"

Today, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer that fiduciaries of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) that invest in the employer’s securities are not...more

6/25/2014 - Duty of Prudence Employee Benefits ERISA ESOP Fiduciary Duty Fiduciary Liability FIfth Third Bancorp v Dudenhoeffer SCOTUS

"Supreme Court Allows Rebuttal of Fraud on the Market at Class Certification Stage in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund"

The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund upheld the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance first recognized by the Court in Basic v. Levinson, but gave defendants a new tool...more

6/23/2014 - Basic v Levinson Board of Directors Class Action D&O Insurance Fraud Fraud-on-the-Market Halliburton Halliburton v Erica P. John Fund SCOTUS Securities Fraud

Inside The Courts - March 2014 | Volume 6 | Issue 1

In This Issue: - U.S. SUPREME COURT: ..Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. March 4, 2014) ..Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, No. 12-79 (U.S. Feb. 26, 2014) - CLASS CERTIFICATION: ..In re BP...more

3/5/2014 - Breach of Duty Chadbourne & Parke LLP v Troice Claim Preclusion Class Action Class Certification Demand Futility Deutsche Bank Fiduciary Duty Hewlett-Packard Lawson v FMR Pensions Preemption SCOTUS SEC Securities Exchange Act Shareholder Litigation Shareholders SLUSA

"Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Protections to Include Employees at Private Firms That Contract...

Today, in a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Lawson v. FMR LLC that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s whistleblower protections apply to employees of a public company’s private contractors and subcontractors. Justice...more

3/4/2014 - Contractors Lawson v FMR Publicly-Traded Companies Sarbanes-Oxley SCOTUS Subcontractors Whistleblower Protection Policies

"Inside the Courts: Supreme Court Decides Scope of ‘In Connection With’ Requirement of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards...

Today, in a 7-2 decision, the United States Supreme Court appeared to narrow the scope of the “in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security” as used in SLUSA. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court...more

2/26/2014 - SCOTUS Securities Fraud Securities Litigation SLUSA

"Inside the Courts: Daimler AG v. Bauman: US Supreme Court Rejects Broad ‘Agency Theory’ of General Jurisdiction"

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Daimler AG v. Bauman, et al. that due process prevents a court from applying an "agency" theory to exercise general personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation based...more

1/14/2014 - DaimlerChrysler DaimlerChrysler v Bauman Jurisdiction SCOTUS Subsidiaries

"Inside the Courts: Supreme Court to Hear Class Action Certification Appeal in Halliburton"

Today, in a case that could have significant implications for putative federal securities class actions, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317. In its petition for...more

11/15/2013 - Class Action Class Certification Fraud-on-the-Market Halliburton Misrepresentation SCOTUS

"Inside the Courts: Supreme Court Clarifies Amount in Controversy Removal Threshold for Class Actions"

Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles, No. 11-1450 (Mar. 19, 2013) - This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that a plaintiff in a class action cannot defeat removal under the Class Action Fairness Act of...more

3/19/2013 - Amount in Controversy CAFA Class Action Damages SCOTUS

"Supreme Court Rejects Discovery Rule on Statute of Limitations for SEC Civil Penalty Enforcement Actions"

Gabelli v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, No. 11-1274 (U.S. Feb. 27, 2013) - In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court today held that the five-year limitations period that governs SEC...more

2/27/2013 - Discovery Rule Enforcement Actions Gabelli v SEC Penalties SCOTUS SEC Securities Fraud Statute of Limitations

"Supreme Court Holds Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Are Not Required to Prove Materiality of Allegedly False Statements to Certify a...

Today, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds that a securities fraud plaintiff alleging fraud on the market need not establish the...more

2/27/2013 - Amgen Inc. v Connecticut Retirement Plans Burden of Proof Class Action Class Certification False Statements Fraud-on-the-Market Insider Trading Materiality Pleadings Rule 10b-5 SCOTUS Securities Fraud

11 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1