Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Claim Construction

Share:

Federal Circuit Answers Questions About Covered Business Method Review Proceedings

In Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., the Federal Circuit outlined the permitted extent of judicial review of Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review proceedings conducted by the USPTO Patent Trial and...more

7/23/2015 - America Invents Act Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction Covered Business Method Patents Covered Business Method Proceedings Judicial Review Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Upholds Broadest Reasonable Interpretation in Inter Partes Review

A divided Federal Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc that would have required the court to revisit its decision in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC (Fed Cir 2015), that upheld the USPTO’s use of the...more

7/23/2015 - America Invents Act Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction En Banc Review Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pending Legislation Petition For Rehearing Popular Post-Grant Review USPTO

Federal Circuit Reverses Unreasonable PTAB Claim Construction, Upholds Idle Free Standard for Motions to Amend

The Federal Circuit decision in Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., addressed several important issues relating to post-grant patent trials conducted by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including the PTAB’s...more

6/24/2015 - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction Inter Partes Review Proceedings Microsoft Motion to Amend Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Post-Grant Review Remand USPTO

Dependent Claims Give Rise to Improper Broadening Reissue

In ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp., the Federal Circuit found that the addition of a dependent claim to a reissue application improperly broadened the scope of the original independent claims beyond the two-year period...more

5/28/2015 - Claim Construction Law-of-the-Case Patent Infringement Patents Reissue Patents

Court Cites Objects of Invention in Claim Construction

Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc. is one of those Federal Circuit decisions that may send patent practitioners running to their files to double-check the phrasing used in their patent applications. Not...more

2/25/2015 - Claim Construction Garmin International Patent Litigation Patents

Why Did the Supreme Court GVR the Shire Lialda Case?

On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded Shire Development LLC v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to the Federal Circuit “for further consideration in light of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA,...more

1/30/2015 - Certiorari Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Pharmaceutical Patents Remand SCOTUS Shire Development v Watson Teva v Sandoz Vacated

Supreme Court Calls for Some Deference in Claim Construction Standard of Review

On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., finding that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure call for some deference in the claim construction standard of...more

1/23/2015 - Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Pharmaceutical Patents SCOTUS Teva v Sandoz

Federal Circuit Vacates Infringement of Braintree SUPREP Patent

In a divided opinion issued in Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on one of two challenged claim construction issues and vacated the district court’s finding of...more

5/30/2014 - ANDA Claim Construction Generic Drugs Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Federal Circuit Finds Easy Solution to Avodart Solvate Written Description Question

Are claims that recite a “solvate” of a chemical compound invalid for lack of written description if the patent does not describe any specific solvates? In GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Banner Pharmacaps, Inc., the Federal Circuit...more

3/13/2014 - Chemicals Claim Construction FDA GlaxoSmithKline Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Written Descriptions

Split Federal Circuit Hews to De Novo Claim Construction Review

In a six-four en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North Am. Corp., a divided Federal Circuit confirmed its practice of de novo claim construction review. The main question arising from the...more

3/3/2014 - Claim Construction De Novo Standard of Review Patent Litigation

Takeda Prevacid SoluTab Patent Valid, But Not Infringed

In Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s finding that Zydus’s proposed generic product infringed Takeda’s Prevacid® SoluTab™ patent, but...more

2/25/2014 - Claim Construction Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Federal Circuit Reverses Board Rejections That Strayed From Claim Construction

In the non-precedential decision in In re Eaton, the Federal Circuit reversed the USPTO Board decision affirming rejections of anticipation and obviousness. The court found that the Board decision strayed from its own claim...more

12/2/2013 - Claim Construction Obviousness Patent Litigation Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Finds Flexibility in Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Infringement

In MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the admissibility of expert testimony that was not fully aligned with the district court’s claim construction. In so doing, the court...more

10/8/2013 - Claim Construction Evidence Expert Testimony Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Federal Circuit Finds LUNESTA Patent Infringement Based on ANDA Product Description Not Avoided by Other Certifications

In Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district’s holding of no Lunesta® patent infringement that was based on a certification submitted to the court, and found...more

10/1/2013 - ANDA Claim Construction FDA Infringement Patents Pharmaceutical Prescription Drugs

Federal Circuit Holds Patentee to Functional Claim Language

In Bayer Cropscience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s claim construction that interpreted “2,4-D monooxygenase” in accordance with its established scientific meaning, even though...more

9/6/2013 - Claim Construction Functionality Infringement Patent Applications Patent Litigation Patents

Claim Construction Not Illuminated By Ambiguous Restriction Requirement

In Plantronics, Inc. v. Alph, Inc., the Federal Circuit rejected arguments that the election made in response to the Restriction Requirement limited the scope of the claims in a manner that was not reflected in the claim...more

8/7/2013 - Ambiguous Boilerplate Language Claim Construction Filing Requirements

In Uship Federal Circuit Finds Prosecution History Disclaimer in Arguments Against Restriction Requirement

In Uship Intellectual Properties, LLC v. United States, the Federal Circuit upheld the claim construction applied by the Court of Federal Claims when it held that the United States and IBM Corporation did not infringe the...more

5/23/2013 - Claim Construction Infringement Patent Prosecution Patents

Federal Circuit Holds That Patent Indefiniteness Requires Insoluble Ambiguousness

In Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s finding that the claims at issue were invalid as indefinite, because the claims were not “insolubly ambiguous.” This case...more

5/3/2013 - Ambiguous Claim Construction Indefiniteness Infringement Medical Devices Patents

Federal Circuit to Reconsider De Novo Review of Claim Construction

In a nonprecedential order issued March 15, 2013, the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc in Lighting Ballast Control, LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp., to consider the following questions: 1. ...more

3/21/2013 - Claim Construction Motion To Reconsider Patents

19 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×