Daniel J. McCoy

Daniel J. McCoy

Fenwick & West LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › FEHA


Prevailing FEHA Defendant Not Entitled To Litigation Costs Unless Plaintiff’s Lawsuit Lacked Objective Basis

The California Supreme Court in Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District affirmed the asymmetrical nature of litigation costs awards in discrimination lawsuits under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act...more

5/22/2015 - CA Supreme Court Cal Code of Civil Procedure Disability Discrimination FEHA Legal Costs Prevailing Party Public Entities

Fenwick Employment Brief - May 2015

EEOC Conciliation Efforts Subject To Limited Judicial Review - In Mach Mining, LLC v. EEOC, the United States Supreme Court held that the conciliation efforts of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) are...more

5/20/2015 - Conciliation Discrimination EEOC Employer Liability Issues FCRA FEHA Human Resources Professionals Judicial Review LinkedIn Litigation Fees & Costs Mach Mining v EEOC Paid Leave Prevailing Party Sick Leave

FEHA Limitations Period Cannot be Shortened by Agreement

In Ellis v. U.S. Security Associates, a California Court of Appeal held that an employer’s attempt to shorten the one year statute of limitations to file a harassment claim under FEHA was against public policy and...more

4/29/2014 - Claims Limitations Period FEHA Harassment

Fenwick Employment Brief - April 2014

Supreme Court Confirms FICA Taxes Must be Withheld from Severance Payments - Finding severance payments to be a form of “remuneration for employment,” the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Quality Stores,...more

4/22/2014 - ADA Disability Discrimination EEOC Employee Handbooks Employer Liability Issues Employment Policies FEHA FICA Taxes Harassment Hills and Dales Hiring & Firing NLRB Posting Requirements Reasonable Accommodation SCOTUS SEC Severance Pay Statute of Limitations Title VII Wages Whistleblowers

Fenwick Employment Brief - July 2013: U.S. Supreme Court Decides Several Employment and Employment-Related Cases

Employer strictly liable for supervisor’s harassment of employee only if supervisor has hire and fire authority over subordinates - In a favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court in Vance v. Ball State...more

7/23/2013 - Adverse Employment Action Discrimination FEHA Harassment Hiring & Firing Race Discrimination Retaliation Supervisors Vance v. Ball State University

Fenwick Employment Brief - July 2013

In a favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court in Vance v. Ball State University ruled that employers are strictly liable for harassment by a supervisor where the supervisor is empowered to take tangible...more

7/22/2013 - Adverse Employment Action Affordable Care Act Class Action Arbitration Waivers Delays DOMA EEOC FEHA Harassment Proposition 8 Retaliation Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS Supervisors Title VII US v Windsor Vance v. Ball State University Vicarious Liability

6 Results
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.