Gene Lee

Gene Lee

Ropes & Gray LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Supreme Court Decides Nautilus v. BioSig and Unanimously Eliminates Federal Circuit’s “Insolubly Ambiguous” Standard for...

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. BioSig Instruments, Inc., No. 13-369, ruled that “a patent is invalid for indefiniteness if its claims, read in light of the specification delineating the patent, and...more

6/3/2014 - Indefiniteness Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Supreme Court Unanimously Reverses Federal Circuit’s En Banc Decision In Limelight v. Akamai and Rejects The Application Of...

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc., No. 12-786, ruled that a party can be liable for induced infringement under § 271(b) only when one party has committed direct infringement...more

6/3/2014 - Akamai Technologies Appeals Certiorari Divided Infringement En Banc Review Induced Infringement License Agreements Limelight Networks Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Supreme Court Sets New Test in Lexmark for Whether a Party Has Standing to Bring a False Advertising Claim under the Lanham Act

On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., No. 12-873 (Mar. 25, 2014), ruled that a two-part inquiry pairing the zone-of-interests test and a proximate-cause...more

3/27/2014 - False Advertising Lanham Act Lexmark Lexmark v Static Control Components SCOTUS

3 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1