Jon Laramore

Jon Laramore

Faegre Baker Daniels

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Supreme Court Decides M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett

On January 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, No. 13-1010, holding that ordinary principles of contract law govern the interpretation of pension and insurance provisions of...more

1/27/2015 - CBAs Collective Bargaining Contract Interpretation Employee Benefits ERISA Health Insurance M&G Polymers v Tackett Retirement SCOTUS Unions Vesting Yard Man

Supreme Court Decides Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp.

On January 21, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp., No. 13-1174, holding that, because cases consolidated for multidistrict pretrial proceedings ordinarily retain their...more

1/22/2015 - Bank of America Banks Case Consolidation Final Judgment Gelboim v Bank of America Multidistrict Litigation SCOTUS

Supreme Court Decides Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean

On January 21, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, holding that an Air Marshal was entitled to whistleblower status after disclosing plans to remove Air Marshals from certain...more

1/22/2015 - DHS DHS v McLean SCOTUS Terrorist Threats Whistleblowers

Supreme Court Decides Holt v. Hobbs

On January 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Holt v. Hobbs, No. 13-6827, holding that the Arkansas Department of Correction’s grooming policy violates Section 3 of the Religious Land Use and...more

1/21/2015 - Department of Corrections Holt v Hobbs Prison Religion Religious Exemption RLUIPA SCOTUS

Supreme Court Decides Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.

On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., No. 13-854, holding that the Federal Circuit must review a district court’s subsidiary factual findings made in the course of...more

1/21/2015 - Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Pharmaceutical Patents SCOTUS Teva v Sandoz

Supreme Court Decides Harris v. Quinn

On June 30, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Harris v. Quinn, No. 11-681, holding that the First Amendment does not permit a state to compel public employees to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union...more

7/1/2014 - Collective Bargaining First Amendment Harris v Quinn Healthcare Medicaid Public Employees Right to Work SCOTUS Union Dues Unions

Supreme Court Decides Halliburton Co. et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.

On June 23, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., holding that plaintiffs in securities fraud class action cases may continue to invoke Basic Inc. v. Levinson's rebuttable...more

6/24/2014 - Basic v Levinson Class Action Fraud Fraud-on-the-Market Halliburton Halliburton v Erica P. John Fund SCOTUS

Supreme Court Decides Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International

On June 19, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, No. 13-298, ruling that patent claims covering methods and systems designed to intermediate the exchange of financial obligations using a...more

6/20/2014 - Alice Corporation CLS Bank CLS Bank v Alice Corp Mayo v. Prometheus Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Risk Mitigation SCOTUS Software

Supreme Court Decides Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, No. 13-193, holding that a credible threat of enforcement of a law is sufficient to establish an Article III injury in fact....more

6/19/2014 - Affordable Care Act Article III SCOTUS Standing

Supreme Court Decides POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.

Petitioner POM Wonderful LLC makes and sells juice products, including a pomegranate-blueberry juice blend. Coca-Cola Company makes a juice blend with a label that prominently displays the words "pomegranate" and "blueberry"...more

6/13/2014 - Advertising Coca Cola FDA FDCA Food Labeling Lanham Act NLEA POM Wonderful POM Wonderful v Coca Cola SCOTUS

Supreme Court Decides Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

In Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison, No. 12-1200, the Supreme Court ruled that when Article III does not permit a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment on a core bankruptcy claim, the bankruptcy court may issue...more

6/10/2014 - Article III Chapter 7 Commercial Bankruptcy EBIA v Arkison Executive Benefits Insurance Agency Fraudulent Conveyance SCOTUS Stern v Marshall Tortious Interference

11 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×