Jonathan Richman

Jonathan Richman

Proskauer Rose LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › SCOTUS

Share:

Government Seeks Supreme Court Review In Second Circuit Insider-Trading Case

After months of will-he-or-won’t-he speculation about whether the U.S. Solicitor General would ask the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit’s restrictive insider-trading decision in United States v. Newman, the question...more

7/31/2015 - Illegal Tipping Insider Trading Material Nonpublic Information Personal Benefit Petition for Writ of Certiorari SCOTUS US v Newman

Court Upholds SEC’s Insider-Trading Complaint and Questions Second Circuit’s Newman Decision

U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff issued a decision in SEC v. Payton (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2015) denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss a civil insider-trading suit filed by the SEC. The court held that the SEC’s complaint had...more

4/8/2015 - Enforcement Actions Illegal Tipping Insider Trading Judge Rakoff Material Nonpublic Information Misappropriation Personal Benefit SCOTUS SEC US v Newman

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability for Statements of Opinion in Registration Statements

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that a statement of opinion in a registration statement cannot be actionable as a misstatement of fact under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 if the issuer actually believed the opinion...more

3/25/2015 - Issuers Omnicare Registration Statement SCOTUS Securities Act of 1933 Statement of Facts Statement of Opinion

Supreme Court Clarifies Liability for Statements of Opinion in Registration Statements

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that a statement of opinion in a registration statement cannot be actionable as a misstatement of fact under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 if the issuer actually believed the opinion...more

3/25/2015 - Issuers Omnicare Registration Statement SCOTUS Securities Act of 1933 Statement of Facts Statement of Opinion

Third Circuit Defines "Extraterritorial" Applicability of Federal Securities Laws in United States v. Georgiou

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit added its voice yesterday to the ongoing judicial effort to construe the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, concerning the extent to...more

1/28/2015 - Appeals Cross-Border Transactions Extraterritoriality Rules Market Manipulation Morrison v National Australia Bank OTCBB SCOTUS Securities Securities Exchange Act Securities Fraud Stock Exchange

Third Circuit Defines “Extraterritorial” Applicability of Federal Securities Laws in United States v. Georgiou

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit added its voice yesterday to the ongoing judicial effort to construe the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, concerning the extent to...more

1/22/2015 - Appeals Extraterritoriality Rules Morrison v National Australia Bank SCOTUS Securities Securities Exchange Act Securities Fraud

Supreme Court May Reject Argument that Opinion Statements Are Actionable Simply Because False

During oral arguments in Omnicare v. Laborers District Council last week, the Supreme Court appeared to signal a rejection of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ position that a sincerely held statement of opinion or belief...more

11/14/2014 - False Statements Omnicare Pharmaceutical Manufacturers SCOTUS Securities Act of 1933 Securities Litigation Whistleblowers

Presumption of Reliance Survives in Securities Cases, But Defendants Can Dispute Price Impact at Class Certification

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday declined to abandon the efficient-market theory, with its rebuttable presumption of reliance that enables securities class actions to proceed without proof of actual reliance on alleged...more

6/24/2014 - Basic v Levinson Class Action Class Certification Fraud Fraud-on-the-Market Halliburton Halliburton v Erica P. John Fund Presumption of Reliance SCOTUS Securities Fraud

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Need to Prove Materiality at Class-Certification Stage in Securities Class Actions

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on February 27, 2013 that a plaintiff need not prove materiality as a prerequisite to obtaining class certification in a securities class action. The Court's ruling in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut...more

2/28/2013 - Amgen Amgen Inc. v Connecticut Retirement Plans Class Action Class Certification Rebuttable Presumptions SCOTUS Securities Fraud Securities Litigation

9 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×