Latest Posts › Business Judgment Rule

Share:

Another Federal Judge Spurns Application Of The Business Judgment Rule To Officers

Last week, I covered the choice of law issue in FDIC v. Faigin, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94899 (C.D. Cal. July 8, 2013) and promised more, When The Parent Is A Blue Hen And The Subsidiary Is A 49er, What Law Governs?...more

7/22/2013 - Business Judgment Rule Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Officers Statutory Interpretation

Officers And The Business Judgment Rule

Recently, I came across the following assertion: First, other than the recent aberration of Poggetto v. Switzer , the BJR has never been applied to officers in California....more

7/17/2013 - Business Judgment Rule Fiduciary Duty Officers

Court Of Appeal Finds Error In Refusal To Give “Business Judgment” Instruction To Jury

Justice Russell C. Ostrander: “judges are not business experts.” Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459, 508 (1919) A few days ago, I wrote about U.S. District Court Judge Dale S. Fischer’s refusal to extend the...more

12/14/2012 - Appeals Business Judgment Rule Fiduciary Duty Officers Reversible Error

Can Officers Contract For The Business Judgment Rule?

Yesterday, I wrote about a recent memorandum opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Dale S. Fischer that led to a jury verdict awarding nearly $169 million in damages against three former corporate officers. Among other things,...more

12/12/2012 - Business Judgment Rule Fiduciary Duty Officers

Is FDIC v. Van Dellem California’s Smith v. Van Gorkom?

Last Friday, the jury in FDIC v. Van Dellem (C.D. Cal. Case No. CV 10-4915 DSF (SHx)) returned a verdict totalling nearly $169 million against three former officers of the home builder division of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. The...more

12/11/2012 - Business Judgment Rule Choice-of-Law

5 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1