Matthew Kreeger

Matthew Kreeger

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

IP Quarterly - Winter 2014

In This Issue: Suprema, Inc. v. ITC; Ibormeith IP, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC; Intellect Wireless v. HTC; and IPR’s Limited Grounds Prove Challenging for Petitioners. Excerpt from Suprema, Inc. v. ITC...more

2/26/2014 - HTC America ITC Mercedes-Benz Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

Arbitration Proceedings Do Not Trigger the One-Year Bar Period for IPR

Although an inter partes review (IPR) can be a powerful weapon to challenge a patent, it comes with a key limitation: a petition for IPR cannot be filed more than one year after the requester has been "served with a complaint...more

2/7/2014 - Arbitration Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents

Bowman v. Monsanto: Crisis Averted on IP Protection for Self-Replicating Technologies

Life science companies in general (and seed companies in particular) are breathing a sigh of relief following the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Bowman v. Monsanto. As Bowman wended its way through district...more

5/14/2013 - Bowman v Monsanto Genetically Engineered Seed Infringement Monsanto Patent Exhaustion Patents SCOTUS Seeds

After Myriad Oral Argument, Supreme Court Set to Decide Patentability of Isolated Human DNA Molecules

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (No. 12-398) to decide the question, “Are human genes patentable?” The Court’s decision in...more

4/16/2013 - AMP v Myriad DNA Gene Patenting Human Genes Oral Argument Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents SCOTUS

4 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1