Peter Lauro

Peter Lauro

Saul Ewing LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications


The Other Shoe Drops on Laches Defense in IP

In 2014, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. held that the equitable doctrine of laches is not available as a defense to copyright infringement when the claim is brought within the three years...more

3/27/2017 - Laches Patent Infringement Patents SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v First Quality Baby Products SCOTUS Statute of Limitations

Supreme Court Interprets Patent Law on Invention’s Components

The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp., No. 14-1538, (February 22, 2017), interpreted 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1), which creates liability for supplying components of multi-component patented...more

3/3/2017 - Component Parts Doctrine Life Technologies Corp v Promega Corp Patent Infringement Patents SCOTUS Section 271

PTAB Designates Two America Invents Act Review Decisions as Precedential

Recently, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated two America Invents Act (AIA) review decisions as precedential: LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology, Ltd. and Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance...more

1/21/2016 - America Invents Act Covered Business Method Proceedings Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding LG Electronics Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Popular Post-Grant Review Precedential Opinion

Federal Circuit Expresses Concern About Patent Eligibility Under Mayo

The “prognosis” for patentability of medical diagnostic claims remains uncertain after an order of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (“Court”) denying a petition for an en banc rehearing of its decision in Ariosa...more

12/9/2015 - Diagnostic Tests En Banc Review Mayo v. Prometheus Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Popular SCOTUS Sequenom

Product-by-Process Claims: A Jurisdictional Overview

The Supreme Court of Japan has issued a decision which made significant changes to how product-by-process claims are handled by the Japanese Patent Office. The decision makes Japanese law on product-by-process claims similar...more

7/21/2015 - Abbott Laboratories Claim Construction European Patent Office Japan Patent Office Patent Infringement Patents Sandoz

Supreme Court Rules that Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity is Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of a patent is not a defense to an induced infringement claim. The Court also affirmed its previous holdings that an induced infringement...more

6/1/2015 - Cisco v CommilUSA Good Faith Induced Infringement Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Patent Prosecution Updates

On April 14, 2015, the House of Representatives introduced a bill to amend the pre-filing grace period provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA). The bill, entitled "Grace Period Restoration Act of 2015" (H.R. 1791),...more

5/11/2015 - America Invents Act Disclosure Requirements Grace Period Patent Term Adjustment Patents Proposed Amendments USPTO

Federal Circuit Decision Extends Potential Patent Term by Months for Many Patents

On January 15, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that patentees are eligible for patent term adjustment (PTA) for the period between a Notice of Allowance and issuance if the period occurs more than...more

1/20/2014 - Patent Reform Patent Term Adjustment Patent Terms Patents

First Post-AIA PTAB Ruling Opens Doors to More Patent Challenges

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB; or “the Board”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its first decision in a post-grant review proceeding. The PTAB ruled that a...more


Next Steps in Light of Myriad

On June 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly awaited ruling in Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (the “Myriad case”), unanimously holding that isolated, naturally occurring DNA was not...more

6/17/2013 - AMP v Myriad DNA Gene Patenting Human Genes Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents

U.S. Supreme Court Qualifies Patent Exhaustion

On May 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Bowman v. Monsanto, decided whether a soybean farmer infringed Monsanto’s patent by replanting patented soybeans harvested from previous crops. The Court unanimously...more

5/16/2013 - Bowman v Monsanto Genetically Engineered Seed Infringement Monsanto Patent Exhaustion Patents SCOTUS Seeds

11 Results
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.