Reza Mollaaghababa

Reza Mollaaghababa

Pepper Hamilton LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Post-Grant Review

Share:

Estoppel Does Not Attach When Petitioner’s Grounds Are Denied As Redundant

Under 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1), a petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent that has resulted in a final written decision by the Board may not request or maintain a proceeding before the Patent Office with...more

4/11/2016 - CAFC Estoppel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Post-Grant Review USPTO

Affirmative Defense of Invalidity As Part of a Motion to Intervene Does Not Bar Filing of a Subsequent IPR Petition

According to 35 U.S.C. §315(a), an inter partes review may not be instituted if, before the date on which the petition for such a review is filed, the petitioner or real party in interest filed a civil action challenging the...more

3/28/2016 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Intervene Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Post-Grant Review

CAFC Vacates a PTAB Decision Due To Faulty Claim Construction

In a rare case of disagreeing with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated and remanded a PTAB decision invalidating claims 10-25 of PPC Broadband, Inc.’s U.S....more

2/29/2016 - CAFC Claim Construction Corporate Counsel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Post-Grant Review Young Lawyers

No Second Bite Of The Apple for Square, Inc. – PTAB Applies Estoppel Provision Of 35 U.S.C. §325(e)(1) TO CBM Review

In the case of Square, Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC (CMB2015-00148), the PTAB held that the grounds raised by Square, Inc. (Petitioner) to challenge the validity of claims 1-4 of Unwired Planet’s U.S. Patent No. 7,711,100...more

1/22/2016 - Covered Business Method Patents Estoppel Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Popular Post-Grant Review Square

Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity Of A Merck Patent Based On Substantial Evidence Standard

In a recent case, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision that certain claims of Merck’s U.S. Patent No. 6,011,040, which were challenged by Gnosis, were invalid as anticipated or obvious....more

1/5/2016 - Merck Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Popular Post-Grant Review

Top Ten Reasons To File Your Patent Applications Before March 16, 2013

The recently enacted America Invents Act (AIA) introduces major changes to the U.S. patent laws, with some significant provisions taking effect on March 16, 2013. These provisions provide several compelling reasons to file...more

2/4/2013 - America Invents Act Filing Deadlines First-to-File First-to-Invent Patent Applications Patent Reform Patents Post-Grant Review Prior Art Prior User

6 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×