Robert Rachal

Robert Rachal

Proskauer Rose LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - January 2014

This month we look at part three of our three part series on Class Actions. In part three, Robert Rachal and M. Todd Mobley address the role of experts in class certification post Wal-Mart and Comcast and how to use and...more

1/21/2014 - Blue Cross Burden of Proof Cafeteria Plans Class Action Class Certification Comcast Contraceptive Coverage Mandate Daubert Standards Discrimination ERISA Flexible Spending Accounts General Motors Health Savings Accounts Human Resources Professionals IRA Predominance Requirement Rule 23 Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS Subject Matter Experts Wal-Mart

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - December 2013

This month we look at part two of our three part series on Class Actions. In part two, Robert Rachal, Page Griffin and Madeline Chimento Rea address Wal-Mart's Rule 23(b) principles, including some defenses to plaintiffs' use...more

12/19/2013 - ADEA Affordable Care Act Class Action Class Certification Collective Actions Comcast v. Behrend Declaratory Relief Dukes v Wal-Mart Duty of Prudence ERISA FLSA Injunctions Plan Administrators Rebuttable Presumptions Wal-Mart

Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Split in Health Care Reform Cases

The Supreme Court will review two of the numerous lawsuits challenging the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) requirement that group health plans and insurers cover, without cost-sharing, contraceptives and/or abortifacients (the...more

12/2/2013 - Affordable Care Act Conflicts of Laws Contraceptive Coverage Mandate First Amendment Healthcare Healthcare Reform Hobby Lobby Religion RFRA

Claims Administrator Not Liable Under ERISA For Alleged Failure to Follow ACA’s Enhanced Benefit Claim Procedures

A federal court in New York appears to have issued the first published decision addressing alleged violations of the enhanced benefit claim procedures arising out of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The new procedures contain...more

11/25/2013 - Affordable Care Act Claim Procedures Employee Benefits ERISA

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter; November 2013

In This Issue: - Labor and Employment and ERISA Class Actions After Wal-Mart and Comcast — Practice Points for Defendants (Part I – Commonality)* - Agencies Release Guidance on HRAs, FSAs, and Employer Payment...more

11/22/2013 - Affordable Care Act Class Action Class Certification Comcast Competition Damages Discrimination Dukes v Wal-Mart ERISA FICA Taxes Flexible Spending Accounts Gender Discrimination Healthcare Healthcare Reform HRA IRS Penalties Rule 23 Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS Section 409A Severance Pay Tax Refunds US v Windsor Wal-Mart

Fourth Circuit Finds District Court Erroneously Applied Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes In Denying Leave to Amend Complaint in Pay...

In its recent decision in Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., No. 12-1610 (4th Cir. Oct. 16, 2013), the Fourth Circuit ruled that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to allow plaintiffs asserting claims of...more

11/5/2013 - Class Certification Commonality Dukes v Wal-Mart Gender Discrimination Gender-Based Pay Discrimination Plain Error

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - July 2013

As Amy Covert and Aaron Feuer discuss below, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. where it is expected to rule next term on whether plan sponsors may dictate in the...more

7/12/2013 - Affordable Care Act Certiorari Compensation & Benefits ERISA Fees Form 720 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. Insurers PCORI SCOTUS Statute of Limitations

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - April 2013

Editor's Overview - The importance of clear and unambiguous plan language cannot be overstated. The Second Circuit recently applied this well-established principle to conclude that a plan's administrative claims process must...more

4/12/2013 - Benefit Plan Sponsors Claim Procedures ERISA Pensions

District Court Permits ERISA Claim for Benefits of IRO Review, Holding Such Review Is Not an Arbitration

In Yox v. Providence Health Plan, No. 12–cv–01348, 2013 WL 865968 (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2013), a federal district court held that the review of benefit denials by an independent review organization (IRO) is not akin to an...more

3/20/2013 - Arbitration Denial of Benefits ERISA Independent Review Organization

9 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1