Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

District Court Grants Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Even Though Interrogatories Contained Discrete Subpart Where...

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") filed a motion to compel defendant, ATopTech, to respond to interrogatories. ATopTech opposed the motion by arguing that it had already answered Synopsys's Set One, Interrogatory Nos....more

12/6/2016 - Interrogatories Motion to Compel Patent Litigation

District Court Orders Additional Deposition of Defendant after Witness Changed Numerous Deposition Answers in Errata

The plaintiff, Chrimar Systems Inc. and Chrimar ("Chrimar") filed a motion to compel an additional deposition of Defendant D-Link Systems, Inc.'s ("D-Link") corporate representative, William C. Brown. Chrimar previously took...more

11/30/2016 - Corporate Officers Depositions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Motion to Compel Patent Litigation

District Court Warns Plaintiff That If It Narrows Its Case Too Close to Trial, It Will Have Its Trial Time Reduced

During the pretrial conference, the Plaintiff Arthrex("Arthrex") told the district court that it may be able to narrow its case once the district court resolved certain pending motions for summary judgment. Shortly after the...more

11/28/2016 - Motion for Summary Judgment Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Pretrial Motions

District Court Orders Additional Claim Construction Briefing After Plaintiff Appeared to Argue a Different Position in Other...

After the district court conducted a claim construction hearing (but before it issued an order), the district court stayed the litigation between Finjan and Symantec pending a decision by the PTAB regarding whether to...more

11/25/2016 - Claim Construction Intellectual Property Litigation Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Popular Symantec

Core Wireless v. LG: District Court Orders Enhanced Damages Based on Defendant's Licensing Discussions

A jury returned a verdict finding that LG infringed the claims of the patent-in-suit and that the claims were not invalid. The jury also found that the infringement was willful. As a result, the district court determined...more

11/22/2016 - Enhanced Damages Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Willful Infringement

District Court Stays Patent Litigation Pending State Court Proceedings That Will Determine Licensing Issue

In this patent infringement action, MMEI, owns U.S. patent 6,234,099 ("the '099 patent"). Fineline Industries, Inc. ("Fineline Inc.") entered into a license agreement with MMEI that permitted Fineline Inc. to use the '099...more

11/17/2016 - Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing IP License Patent Infringement Royalties Stays

District Court Precludes Defendant from Referring to Plaintiff's Past Settlements as "Nuisance Value" But Allows Amount of Such...

As this patent infringement proceeded closer to trial, the parties filed various motions in limine. The plaintiff, PerDiemco, filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence or argument referring to PerDiem's prior settlements...more

11/15/2016 - Admissible Evidence Motions in Limine Patent Infringement

District Court Orders Plaintiff to Produce Factual Support for Infringement Contentions Regardless of Work Product Doctrine

Huawei and Blackberry filed motions to compel seeking the factual material that the plaintiff, SPH, had relied upon to support its infringement contentions. SPH opposed the motion to compel, arguing that Defendants' requests...more

11/10/2016 - Blackberry Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Work-Product Doctrine

Barry v. Medtronic: District Court Orders Strict Limits on Social Media Contacts with Potential Jurors

As the patent infringement case between Mark Barry, M.D. ("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it intended to provide the parties with a list of potential jurors to assist...more

11/8/2016 - Jury Selection Medtronic Patent Infringement Popular Social Networks Voir Dire

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions for Doctrine of Equivalents and Indirect Infringement That Did Not...

The defendant filed a motion to strike part of the plaintiff's initial infringement contentions, focusing on infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and indirect infringement. The defendant asserted that the Local...more

11/3/2016 - Doctrine of Equivalents Indirect Infringement Motion To Strike Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

After Plaintiff Asserted Boilerplate Objections to Discovery, District Court Orders Plaintiff's Objections Waived

The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant for patent infringement, trade dress infringement and unfair competition, among other claims, based on the defendants' marketing and selling of portable vaporizers. The...more

11/1/2016 - Discovery Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Trade Dress Unfair Competition

District Court Grants Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Preclude Defendant from Discussing Case with Plaintiff's...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant, GHP Group, Inc. ("GHP"), hired the Plaintiff's, ProCom Heating, Inc. ("ProCom"), president during the litigation. The Plaintiff then filed a request for a temporary...more

10/28/2016 - Corporate Officers Patent Infringement Popular Preliminary Injunctions Restraining Orders

District Court Concludes that Plaintiff Is Collaterally Estopped from Asserting Two Related Patents After Court in Another...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant moved for dismissal based on collateral estoppel and Alice contending that a prior district court had found the patents invalid for lack of patentable subject matter. Before...more

10/25/2016 - Collateral Estoppel Dismissals Issue Preclusion Patent Infringement Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

District Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Where Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Pending on Claims from Different Patent...

In earlier patent infringement litigation, the Plaintiff sued Ancestry.com DNA, LLC ("Ancestry") in the District of Delaware ("Delaware litigation") alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Number 8,221,381 (the "'381 patent")....more

10/21/2016 - Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Refuses to Amend Protective Order to Permit Expert, Who Was Former Employee of Competitor, to Review Confidential...

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, High 5 Games ("High 5"), moved for an order overruling the plaintiff's, Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami"), objection to an expert witness viewing confidential information. In...more

10/19/2016 - Confidential Information Expert Witness Federal Rules of Evidence Patent Infringement Protective Orders

CG Technology v. DraftKings: District Court Stays Discovery Pending Motion to Dismiss Challenging Validity of Asserted Patents...

DraftKings filed a motion to stay discovery until the district court had an opportunity to rule on the a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss asserted that all of the ten patents-in-suit were invalid because they claimed...more

10/13/2016 - DraftKings Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Motion To Stay Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patent-in-Suit Patents

Oracle v. Google: Violation of Protective Order to Disclose Confidential Information in Open Court

In this long standing litigation between Oracle and Google, a dispute arose over the protective order and whether the disclosure of certain information violated the terms of the protective order when it was disclosed in open...more

10/11/2016 - Oracle v Google Patent Litigation

District Court Holds that Document Retention and Destruction Policies Are Privileged under Court's Default Discovery Standard

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff sought production of the defendant's document retention and document destruction policies. The defendant asserted that the request sought information protected by work product...more

10/6/2016 - Attorney-Client Privilege Discovery Document Destruction Document Retention Policies Patent Litigation

District Court Declines to Vacate Ruling That Patent Is Invalid for Covering Unpatentable Abstract Ideas after the Parties Settled...

The Plaintiffs filed a patent infringement action against the defendant, Netskope, accusing Netskope of infringing U.S. Patent Number 7,305,707 (the "707 Patent"). Netskope filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which...more

10/4/2016 - Appeals Motion for Judgment Motion to Vacate Patent Infringement Settlement

Plaintiff Granted Dismissal Based on Covenant Not to Sue Even With Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pending

The plaintiff, Shipping and Transit, LLC ("Plaintiff"), filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Neptune Cigars, Inc. ("Defendant"), for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,415,207 ("the '207 Patent") and 6,763,299...more

9/29/2016 - Covenant Not to Sue Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Subject Matter Jurisdiction

District Court Excludes Damage Expert's Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation

In this patent infringement action between Finjan and Sophos, the district court had previously granted a motion to exclude Finjan's damage expert. The district court explained that the expert's, Layne-Farrar, "method of...more

9/27/2016 - Apportionment Expert Witness Motion to Exclude Patent Infringement Royalties

District Court Denies Request to Preclude Defendant from Sharing Confidential Information of Plaintiff with PTAB as part of Inter...

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec and CaptionCall, CaptionCall filed a motion for relief from the stipulated protective order in order to use confidential commercial information from Ultratec (the...more

9/22/2016 - Confidential Information Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Patent Infringement Protective Orders

District Court Stays Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") over Defendant's Objection That Summary Judgment Motion Should...

After the Patent Trial and Appellate Board ("PTAB") instituted inter partes review ("IPR") of all asserted claims in three of the Patents-in-Suit and with the PTAB's decision on FMC's petition for IPR of the fourth challenged...more

9/20/2016 - Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Markman Hearing Multi-Factor Test Order to Stay Patent-in-Suit

District Court Precludes Damage Expert from Using a Settlement Agreement to Derive a Reasonable Royalty Calculation Where Expert...

MAX Encryption Technologies ("MAZ") filed a patent infringement action against Blackberry for patent entitled "Method of Transparent Encryption and Decryption for an Electronic Document Management System," U.S. Patent No....more

9/15/2016 - Blackberry Encryption Expert Testimony Patent Infringement Royalties Settlement Agreements

District Court Orders Production of Source Code in Searchable Format

The plaintiff, [24]7 Customer, Inc. ("[24]/7"), filed a lawsuit against Defendant LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") alleging that LivePerson infringed several patents pertaining to a customer engagement software platform. After...more

9/13/2016 - Online Platforms Patent Infringement Source Code

349 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 14

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×