Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Damage Expert Where Damage Expert Did Not Serve Report Prior to Court Deadline

In this patent infringement suit, Defendants and Counterclaimants James Stephens and Spectrum Laboratories, LLC ("Spectrum") moved to strike the report of Plaintiff's damages expert, Robert Taylor. Spectrum argued that the...more

2/26/2016 - Damages Expert Testimony Motion To Strike Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

Applying New Proportionality Requirements, Court Grants Motion to Compel and Orders Production of Unredacted Tax Returns and...

In this patent infringement action, Slide Fire Solutions, LP ("Slide Fire") moved to compel discovery responses from Bump Fire Systems ("Bump Fire"). Bump Fire also requested a protective order to prevent the disclosure of...more

2/23/2016 - Attorney's Fees Confidential Information Discovery FRCP 26(b)(1) Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Proportionality Tax Returns

Chestnut v. Apple: District Court Puts Plaintiff to the Test--Proceed on Limited Number of Claims or Continue Stay pending Inter...

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff asserted claims from two different patents against Apple. Apple filed an Inter Partes Review ("IPR") with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") and moved to stay the case...more

2/18/2016 - Apple Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

District Court Grants Motion to Exclude Proceeding before PTAB during IPR But Allows Admissions and Arguments Made to PTAB to go...

The plaintiff, Magna, filed a motion in limine to exclude references to Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings. The defendant, TRW, filed a response, arguing that evidence was relevant to multiple issues at trial, including,...more

2/15/2016 - Admissible Evidence Inter Partes Review Proceedings Jury Trial Motion to Exclude Obviousness Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from...

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series of e-mails demonstrating that in 2011, plaintiff engaged plaintiff's...more

2/11/2016 - Depositions Discovery Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Rule 30(b)(6) Samsung

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at issue in the case. The defendants argued that two district courts had already...more

2/9/2016 - Citigroup Motion for Summary Judgment Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation The Patent Act

Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial process that it was seeking to introduce evidence of copying as an indication...more

2/5/2016 - Admissible Evidence Motion to Exclude Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until...

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,346,876 ("the '876 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 6,737,989 ("the '989...more

2/2/2016 - Burden of Proof Clear and Convincing Evidence Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation

District Court Declines to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Where Claim Construction Briefing Had Already Occurred

After the PTAB granted Defendant's petition for IPR on certain of the claims in the patent-in-suit, the defendant filed a motion to stay the action pending the resolution of the IPR. The plaintiffs objected to a stay, but...more

1/28/2016 - Claim Construction Inter Partes Review Proceedings Markman Hearing Motion To Stay Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

District Court Strikes Expert Opinion Testimony on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Section 101

Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Metaswitch Networks Corp. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert opinions of Mr. Lanning, including his opinions that the patents in suit claim patent-eligible...more

1/26/2016 - Expert Testimony Motion To Strike Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patent-in-Suit

Expert Patent Valuation Opinion Based on Forward Citation Analysis Survives Daubert Challenge

Plaintiff Better Mouse Company's ("Better Mouse") filed a motion to strike portions of the rebuttal expert report and exclude testimony of Richard Eichmann. Better Mouse asserted that the district court should exclude Mr....more

1/20/2016 - Daubert Standards Expert Testimony Patent Litigation Patents Valuation

District Court Denies Request for Contempt Where Defendant Continued to Provide Repairs and Replacement Parts to Enjoined Devices

Plaintiff Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "ATD") filed an ex parte application for a judgment of civil contempt against Defendant Ridge Corporation's ("Defendant" or "Ridge") for allegedly violating of the...more

1/18/2016 - Contempt Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Declines to Delay Transfer of Case Pending Ruling on Claim Construction

The plaintiffs, Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC ("Chrimar"), filed a motion to reconsider the district court's order granting Ruckus Wireless, Inc.'s ("Ruckus") motion to transfer venue to the Northern...more

1/15/2016 - Claim Construction Motion To Reconsider Patent Litigation Transfer of Venue

District Court Denies Motion for Leave to Have Forensic Expert Report Used as Affirmative Evidence

The defendants filed a motion for leave to have the forensic expert report of Curtis Rose considered as affirmative evidence. The defendants timely served Rose's expert rebuttal report but sought to use his opinions as...more

1/14/2016 - Discovery Expert Testimony Garmin International Motion for Leave Patent Litigation

District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent...

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury returned a $30 million award in favor of Prism, Prism filed a motion for an...more

1/8/2016 - Damages Jury Instructions Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Royalties Sprint

eDekka Gets Decked by Finding of Exceptional Case in the Eastern District of Texas

Plaintiff eDekka LLC ("eDekka") sued a large number of defendants in Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,266,674 ("the '674 Patent") titled "Random Access Information Retrieval Utilizing User...more

1/5/2016 - Attorney's Fees CLS Bank v Alice Corp Complex Litigation Exceptional Case Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter SCOTUS

District Court Declines to Modify Claim Construction Based on PTAB Denial of IPR

Adidas AG ("Adidas"), filed a patent infringement action against Under Armour, Inc. ("Under Armour") and MapMyFitness, Inc. ("MapMyFitness") alleging that they infringed over a dozen patents. After Under Armour and...more

12/31/2015 - Adidas Claim Construction Markman Hearing Patent Infringement

District Court Denies Request for Finding of Exceptional Case Where Plaintiff Pursued and Lost Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Moblize contended that TDE Petroleum Data Solutions, Inc ("TDE") either knew or should have known that its motion for preliminary injunction was meritless and that it was brought for the improper purpose of harassing Moblize....more

12/28/2015 - Exceptional Case Patent Infringement Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Denies Discovery Served Too Close to Discovery Cut-Off

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action, alleging that Defendant B2B Supply and Defendant Jerrell P. Squyres (hereinafter "Defendants") infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,731,462 (the '462 patent). Toward the end of discovery,...more

12/23/2015 - Additional Discovery Discovery Patent Infringement

District Court Grants Sanctions Reducing Number of 30(b)(6) Depositions, Awarding Costs to Plaintiff and with a Warning that...

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion for discovery sanctions. The plaintiff argued in its motion that defendant failed to comply with the district court's October 7, 2015 oral discovery order and...more

12/21/2015 - Depositions Discovery Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Rule 30(b)(6) Sanctions

A Snapshot of University Patent Litigation

As patent litigation overall has grown rapidly since 2010, the industry has also seen a shift in some traditionally litigation averse players. University tech transfer organizations in particular have increased their filings...more

12/18/2015 - Apple Carnegie Mellon Johns Hopkins Non-Practicing Entities Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trolls Popular Universities

District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing Where Plaintiff Could Not Establish That It Owned All Substantial...

Plaintiff Max Sound Corporation ("Max Sound") filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") against three defendants: Google, Inc., YouTube, LLC and On2 Technologies (collectively, "Defendants"), for the infringement of Patent No....more

12/14/2015 - Alter Ego Google License Agreements Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Patent Ownership Standing YouTube

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Denied Where Complaint Alleged Sufficient Facts to Establish...

Defendant's filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion, contending that Plaintiffs lacked standing because no case or controversy existed at the time Plaintiffs filed the complaint. Defendant argued...more

12/9/2015 - Injury-in-Fact Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Standing Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Calling the "Hotline": Witness Ordered to Answer "Who" and "When" Deposition Questions Regarding Litigation Hold Memorandum

On November 17, 2015, during a deposition of a fact witness, counsel for the plaintiff, Ericsson Inc. ("Ericsson"), attempted to question the witness regarding a litigation hold memorandum (the "memo"). Counsel for the...more

12/7/2015 - Ericsson Litigation Hold Patent Litigation

District Court Declines Request to Vacate Claim Construction Order after Parties Enter into Consent Judgment

Canvs filed a patent infringement action in 2014 asserting that Nivisys induced and contributed to the infringement of its patent through the sale of TACS and TACS-M products. After a lengthy stay, the district court held a...more

12/3/2015 - Claim Construction Collateral Estoppel Markman Hearing Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

293 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 12

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×