Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Cascades v. Samsung: Court Denies Motion to Compel Deposition of Trial Counsel but Grants Request to Produce Fee Agreement

Defendant Samsung Electronics Co. ("Samsung") filed a motion to compel plaintiff Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC ("Cascades") to produce additional documents and to require its trial counsel to appear for a deposition....more

6/5/2015 - Depositions Document Productions Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patents Samsung Witnesses

Farstone v. Apple: With "far too many disputes," Court orders face-to-face meet and confer to resolve motion to compel

Apple filed a motion to compel discovery from Farstone Technology, Inc. ("Farstone") by way of a Joint Stipulation as required by the court's local rules. After the court reviewed the joint stipulation, it found that there...more

6/4/2015 - Apple Local Rules Meet and Confer Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

No Vacation in Florida: Court Orders Notice of Vacation Designation Stricken

In this patent infringement action between Natural Chemistry LP and Orenda Technologies, Inc. ("Orenda"), Orenda's counsel filed a notice of vacation designation, which the district court characterized as a notice of...more

5/29/2015 - Patent Infringement Patents

District Court Orders Submission of Expert Reports on Damages to Determine Proper Usage of Entire Market Value Rule

Invista North America S.A. R.L. ("Invistia") filed a patent infringement action against M&G USA Corporation ("M&G"). As the case progressed toward trial, both parties exchanged expert reports on damages, which implicated the...more

5/26/2015 - Expert Testimony Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Valuation Experts

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Based on Section 101 Denied Where Defendant Failed to Include Challenge in Invalidity...

In this patent infringement action between Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. ("Good) and Defendant MobileIron, Inc. ("MobileIron"). Two months before the trial, MobileIron moved to...more

5/21/2015 - Abstract Ideas Judgment on the Pleadings Motion for Judgment Patent Litigation Patents Section 101

District Court Denies Motion to Compel and for Sanctions Where CFO Could Not Be Compelled to Testify on Broad Deposition Topics...

Plaintiff Stoneeagle Services, Inc. ("Stoneeagle") filed a motion seeking sanctions against Defendant Premier Healthcare Exchange, Inc. ("PHX") for failing to provide a prepared corporate representative to testify pursuant to...more

5/20/2015 - Depositions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents

Another One Bites the Dust: Action Dismissed for Lack of Standing Where Plaintiff Could Not Prove Ownership of the Patent-In-Suit

America's Collectibles Network ("ACN") filed a patent infringement action in which it claimed to own U.S. Patent No. 8,370,211 (the "211 Patent"). It brought this action against the Genuine Gemstone Company ("Genuine...more

5/15/2015 - Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Standing

Fairchild v. Power Integrations: Because of Right to Appeal, District Court Precludes Reference to Pending Reexamination...

Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp.'s (collectively, "Fairchild") moved in limine to preclude any reference to any pending reexamination proceeding or any completed reexamination proceeding of any...more

5/13/2015 - Appeals Induced Infringement Motions in Limine Patent Litigation Patents USPTO Willful Infringement

District Court Denies Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Where Trial Was Less Than a Year Away and Defendant's Previous...

Presidio Components, Inc. ("Presidio") filed a complaint against American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC") asserting a claim for patent infringement. ATC filed a motion to stay the case pending PTO review of the...more

5/11/2015 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patents

District Court Excludes Prior Art References in Expert Report That Were Not Included in Invalidity Contentions

After the district court adopted a specialized scheduling order that was based on local patent rules in other districts, the plaintiffs served detailed infringement contentions and the defendant served detailed invalidity...more

5/5/2015 - Expert Witness Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Local Rules Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Denies Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony on the Ground That the Expert Was Not a Person Having Ordinary Skill in...

Defendants sought to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff's expert Joseph C. McAlexander III in its entirety because he lacked the appropriate technical background. In their motion, Defendants alleged that Mr. McAlexander's...more

5/2/2015 - Admissibility Expert Testimony Motion to Exclude Patents

Aylus v. Apple: District Court Orders Production of Revenue Documents

Aylus Networks, Inc. ("Aylus") sought documents from Apple "relating to the revenue, costs and profits from (1) purchases or rentals of iTunes video content using the accused Apple TV and/or iOS products iPhone, iPad, and...more

4/28/2015 - Apple Discovery iTunes

District Court Declines to Lift Stay Even After Patent Trial and Appeal Board Issued Written Decision on CBM Petitions

The district court stayed several consolidated cases pending certain proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). In the order granting the stay, the district court stated: "Upon issuance of a final decision...more

4/24/2015 - Case Consolidation Covered Business Method Patents Order to Stay Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents

District Court Dismisses Action after Patent Is Transferred to President of Company

After Plaintiff Pi-Net International, Inc. ("Pi-Net") brought suit against Defendants Focus Business Bank and Bridge Bank, N.A. for patent infringement, the Patent and Trademark Office initiated an Inter Partes Review ("IPR")...more

4/20/2015 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent-in-Suit Patents Standing Stays Transfer of Assets

District Court Denies Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse

The defendants in this patent infringement action filed several motions for leave to amend their answers to include various affirmative defenses, including: (1) the affirmative defense of patent misuse; (2) the affirmative...more

4/16/2015 - Affirmative Defenses Counterclaims Motion to Amend Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Denies Motion for Leave to File Summary Judgment as Premature Prior to Claim Construction

Rec Software USA, Inc. ("Rec") filed a patent infringement action against HTC America, Inc. ("HTC"). HTC requested leave to file a motion for summary judgment based on 35 U.S.C. §101. The request for leave to file the summary...more

4/13/2015 - Claim Construction HTC America Motion for Summary Judgment Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Lifts Stay After Covered Business Method Review Is Dismissed Because Federal Circuit Would Not Have Jurisdiction to...

Plaintiff GT Nexus, Inc. ("GT Nexus") filed a declaratory judgment action against Inttra, Inc. ("Inttra") seeking a declaration that four of Inttra's patents ("patents-in-suit") were invalid and have not been infringed....more

4/13/2015 - Counterclaims Covered Business Method Proceedings Declaratory Judgments Patent Infringement Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-in-Suit Patents Stays

District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing on the Eve of Trial

Plaintiff Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC ("Labyrinth") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. ("Lucent"), alleging that Lucent infringes U.S. Patent No. 8,103,173 (the "'173...more

4/7/2015 - Dismissals Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Denies Unopposed Request to Seal Exhibits Where Only Justification for Sealing Was That Parties Designated the...

Defendant Ericsson filed an unopposed motion for leave to file its motion to strike certain paragraphs of a supplemental expert report for the plaintiff under seal. Although the request was unopposed, the district court...more

4/2/2015 - Confidential Information Ericsson Patent Litigation Patents Protective Orders Supplemental Information

Expert Is Not Permitted to Testify to Alternate Hypothetical Negotiation Dates Where No Hypothetical Negotiation Was Conducted for...

After the parties submitted expert reports in this patent infringement action, Ford objected to Eagle Harbor's damage expert's expected testimony and demonstratives. Ford objected to Eagle Harbor's evidence because it...more

3/31/2015 - Evidence Expert Testimony Patent Litigation Patent Royalties Patents Royalties

Patent Misuse and Patent Exhaustion Asserted as Stand Alone Claims Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim

Continental Automotive GmbH and Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. (collectively "Continental") filed a multi-claim lawsuit against iBiquity Digital Corporation ("iBiquity"), which asserted causes of action for patent...more

3/27/2015 - Declaratory Judgments Patent Exhaustion Patent-Misuse Patents Subject Matter Jurisdiction

District Court Denies Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination Where Defendant Was Competitor of Plaintiff and Chose Ex Parte...

Plaintiff Ecolab Inc. ("Ecolab") filed a patent infringement action alleging that Gurtler infringed Ecolab's patent for "SANITIZING LAUNDRY SOUR," United States Patent No. 6,262,013 (the "'013 Patent"). Gurtler subsequently...more

3/25/2015 - Ex Partes Reexamination Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Denies Motion to Stay Pending Ex parte Reexamination Where Defendant Was Competitor of Plaintiff and Chose Ex Parte...

Plaintiff Ecolab Inc. ("Ecolab") filed a patent infringement action alleging that Gurtler infringed Ecolab's patent for "SANITIZING LAUNDRY SOUR," United States Patent No. 6,262,013 (the "'013 Patent"). Gurtler subsequently...more

3/19/2015 - Ex Partes Reexamination Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Agrees to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") But Only if Defendants Agreed to Be Bound by Estoppel...

After the defendants moved to stay a patent infringement action pending an IPR, the district court analyzed the impact of a potential withdrawal of petitioners from the IPR. The district court began its analysis with the...more

3/16/2015 - Estoppel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patents Withdrawal

District Court Declines to Stay Proceeding Pending Inter Partes Review Where Plaintiff and Defendant Were Direct Competitors

Card-Monroe Corp. ("CMC") manufactures tufting machines and equipment. CMC holds several patents that pertain to its machines and equipment. Tuftco Corp. ("Tuftco") is a competitor of CMC, which also engages in the...more

3/12/2015 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Manufacturers Motion To Stay Patent Litigation Patents

217 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 9

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×