Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

District Court Precludes Plaintiff from Presenting Damage Theories That Were Not Disclosed in Rule 26(a) Disclosures

The plaintiff, Radware, planned to present damages theories in its closing argument seeking more than twice the damages that its retained expert on damages computed. The district court noted that "[w]hile expert testimony is...more

3/28/2016 - Calculation of Damages Closing Arguments Discovery Expert Testimony Patent Litigation Rule 26

District Court Requires Plaintiffs to State Whether "Plain Meaning" Encompasses Defendants' Proposed Claim Constructions

In this patent infringement action, the defendants asked the district court to compel the plaintiffs to provide constructions for disputed claim terms identified by the parties under the Local Patent Rules. Defendants...more

3/23/2016 - Claim Construction Order To Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Plain Meaning

Partial Summary Judgment Granted on Failure to Mark Where Defendant Stipulated That Plaintiff Practiced the Patent-In-Suit

Metaswitch Networks Ltd. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion for partial summary judgment to limit Genband US LLC's ("Genband") damages based on a failure to mark. In support of its motion, Metaswitch argued that partial summary...more

3/21/2016 - Genuine Issue of Material Fact Partial Summary Judgments Patent Litigation Patent-in-Suit Pre-Suit Damages

Oracle v. Google: District Court Rejects Jury Questionnaire and Orders Parties to Show Cause Why the Court Should Not Ban Internet...

As the re-trial in the Oracle v. Google case approaches, both parties requested an opportunity to use a jury questionnaire followed by a limited, one hour oral voir dire. The district court reviewed the proposed questionnaire...more

3/16/2016 - Google Investigations Juror Selection Jury Trial Oracle Oracle v Google Order to Show Cause Patent Litigation Social Media Voir Dire

District Court Declines to Exclude Damage Expert Even Though Expert Relied Upon Information Not Disclosed During Discovery

Plaintiffs Equistar Chemicals, LP and MSI Technology, LLC accused Westlake Chemical Corporation ("Westlake") of infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,064,163. The asserted patent relates to a method of making polyolefin-based adhesive...more

3/15/2016 - Cross Examination Damages Daubert Hearing Discovery Expert Testimony Federal Rules of Evidence Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Grants Motion for Summary Judgment on Laches Defense Where Defendant Could Not Establish Prejudice from Plaintiff's...

The court explained the facts as follows: The defendant, CrestaTech, was founded by Mihai Murgulescu and George Haber in 2005. Its initial products included a receiver for satellite radio and a television platform. CrestaTech...more

3/14/2016 - Confidentiality Agreements Laches Non-Disclosure Agreement Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Pre-Suit Damages Prejudice Summary Judgment

Cisco v. Sprint: Declaratory Judgment Action Dismissed Where Cisco Could Not Show Case or Controversy Based on Suits Against...

Plaintiff Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco") filed two declaratory judgment actions against Sprint seeking to invalidate six Sprint patents and seeking a declaration of non-infringement of seven Sprint patents. Cisco is a...more

3/11/2016 - Cisco Declaratory Judgment Act Direct Infringement Dismissals Federal Jurisdiction Indemnification Justiciable Controversy Noninfringement Patent Litigation Sprint

District Court Denies Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Damage Expert Report Where Expert Relied Upon Comparable Licenses

In this patent infringement action, Plaintiffs filed a motion to exclude the defendant's damage expert. The motion sought to exclude portion of the defendant's expert report on damages, in particular the "market share...more

3/4/2016 - Expert Testimony IP License Motion to Exclude Patent Infringement

The Problem with Backup Tapes: District Court Orders Retention of Old Backup Tapes for Ongoing Litigation

In this patent infringement action pending in a multi-district litigation, one of the defendants moved the district court for an order allowing the defendant to destroy old backup tapes. Defendant ICM, Inc. ("ICM") moved for...more

3/1/2016 - Corporate Counsel Data Retention Discovery Multidistrict Litigation Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Damage Expert Where Damage Expert Did Not Serve Report Prior to Court Deadline

In this patent infringement suit, Defendants and Counterclaimants James Stephens and Spectrum Laboratories, LLC ("Spectrum") moved to strike the report of Plaintiff's damages expert, Robert Taylor. Spectrum argued that the...more

2/26/2016 - Damages Expert Testimony Motion To Strike Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

Applying New Proportionality Requirements, Court Grants Motion to Compel and Orders Production of Unredacted Tax Returns and...

In this patent infringement action, Slide Fire Solutions, LP ("Slide Fire") moved to compel discovery responses from Bump Fire Systems ("Bump Fire"). Bump Fire also requested a protective order to prevent the disclosure of...more

2/23/2016 - Attorney's Fees Confidential Information Discovery FRCP 26(b)(1) Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Proportionality Tax Returns

Chestnut v. Apple: District Court Puts Plaintiff to the Test--Proceed on Limited Number of Claims or Continue Stay pending Inter...

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff asserted claims from two different patents against Apple. Apple filed an Inter Partes Review ("IPR") with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") and moved to stay the case...more

2/18/2016 - Apple Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

District Court Grants Motion to Exclude Proceeding before PTAB during IPR But Allows Admissions and Arguments Made to PTAB to go...

The plaintiff, Magna, filed a motion in limine to exclude references to Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings. The defendant, TRW, filed a response, arguing that evidence was relevant to multiple issues at trial, including,...more

2/15/2016 - Admissible Evidence Inter Partes Review Proceedings Jury Trial Motion to Exclude Obviousness Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from...

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series of e-mails demonstrating that in 2011, plaintiff engaged plaintiff's...more

2/11/2016 - Depositions Discovery Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Rule 30(b)(6) Samsung

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at issue in the case. The defendants argued that two district courts had already...more

2/9/2016 - Citigroup Motion for Summary Judgment Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation The Patent Act

Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial process that it was seeking to introduce evidence of copying as an indication...more

2/5/2016 - Admissible Evidence Motion to Exclude Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until...

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,346,876 ("the '876 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 6,737,989 ("the '989...more

2/2/2016 - Burden of Proof Clear and Convincing Evidence Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation

District Court Declines to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Where Claim Construction Briefing Had Already Occurred

After the PTAB granted Defendant's petition for IPR on certain of the claims in the patent-in-suit, the defendant filed a motion to stay the action pending the resolution of the IPR. The plaintiffs objected to a stay, but...more

1/28/2016 - Claim Construction Inter Partes Review Proceedings Markman Hearing Motion To Stay Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

District Court Strikes Expert Opinion Testimony on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Section 101

Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Metaswitch Networks Corp. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert opinions of Mr. Lanning, including his opinions that the patents in suit claim patent-eligible...more

1/26/2016 - Expert Testimony Motion To Strike Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patent-in-Suit

Expert Patent Valuation Opinion Based on Forward Citation Analysis Survives Daubert Challenge

Plaintiff Better Mouse Company's ("Better Mouse") filed a motion to strike portions of the rebuttal expert report and exclude testimony of Richard Eichmann. Better Mouse asserted that the district court should exclude Mr....more

1/20/2016 - Daubert Standards Expert Testimony Patent Litigation Patents Valuation

District Court Denies Request for Contempt Where Defendant Continued to Provide Repairs and Replacement Parts to Enjoined Devices

Plaintiff Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "ATD") filed an ex parte application for a judgment of civil contempt against Defendant Ridge Corporation's ("Defendant" or "Ridge") for allegedly violating of the...more

1/18/2016 - Contempt Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Declines to Delay Transfer of Case Pending Ruling on Claim Construction

The plaintiffs, Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC ("Chrimar"), filed a motion to reconsider the district court's order granting Ruckus Wireless, Inc.'s ("Ruckus") motion to transfer venue to the Northern...more

1/15/2016 - Claim Construction Motion To Reconsider Patent Litigation Transfer of Venue

District Court Denies Motion for Leave to Have Forensic Expert Report Used as Affirmative Evidence

The defendants filed a motion for leave to have the forensic expert report of Curtis Rose considered as affirmative evidence. The defendants timely served Rose's expert rebuttal report but sought to use his opinions as...more

1/14/2016 - Discovery Expert Testimony Garmin International Motion for Leave Patent Litigation

District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent...

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury returned a $30 million award in favor of Prism, Prism filed a motion for an...more

1/8/2016 - Damages Jury Instructions Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Royalties Sprint

eDekka Gets Decked by Finding of Exceptional Case in the Eastern District of Texas

Plaintiff eDekka LLC ("eDekka") sued a large number of defendants in Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,266,674 ("the '674 Patent") titled "Random Access Information Retrieval Utilizing User...more

1/5/2016 - Attorney's Fees CLS Bank v Alice Corp Complex Litigation Exceptional Case Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter SCOTUS

302 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 13

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×