Latest Publications

Share:

District Court Stays Patent Litigation Pending State Court Proceedings That Will Determine Licensing Issue

In this patent infringement action, MMEI, owns U.S. patent 6,234,099 ("the '099 patent"). Fineline Industries, Inc. ("Fineline Inc.") entered into a license agreement with MMEI that permitted Fineline Inc. to use the '099...more

District Court Precludes Defendant from Referring to Plaintiff's Past Settlements as "Nuisance Value" But Allows Amount of Such...

As this patent infringement proceeded closer to trial, the parties filed various motions in limine. The plaintiff, PerDiemco, filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence or argument referring to PerDiem's prior settlements...more

District Court Orders Plaintiff to Produce Factual Support for Infringement Contentions Regardless of Work Product Doctrine

Huawei and Blackberry filed motions to compel seeking the factual material that the plaintiff, SPH, had relied upon to support its infringement contentions. SPH opposed the motion to compel, arguing that Defendants' requests...more

Barry v. Medtronic: District Court Orders Strict Limits on Social Media Contacts with Potential Jurors

As the patent infringement case between Mark Barry, M.D. ("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it intended to provide the parties with a list of potential jurors to assist...more

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions for Doctrine of Equivalents and Indirect Infringement That Did Not...

The defendant filed a motion to strike part of the plaintiff's initial infringement contentions, focusing on infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and indirect infringement. The defendant asserted that the Local...more

After Plaintiff Asserted Boilerplate Objections to Discovery, District Court Orders Plaintiff's Objections Waived

The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant for patent infringement, trade dress infringement and unfair competition, among other claims, based on the defendants' marketing and selling of portable vaporizers. The...more

District Court Grants Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Preclude Defendant from Discussing Case with Plaintiff's...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant, GHP Group, Inc. ("GHP"), hired the Plaintiff's, ProCom Heating, Inc. ("ProCom"), president during the litigation. The Plaintiff then filed a request for a temporary...more

District Court Concludes that Plaintiff Is Collaterally Estopped from Asserting Two Related Patents After Court in Another...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant moved for dismissal based on collateral estoppel and Alice contending that a prior district court had found the patents invalid for lack of patentable subject matter. Before...more

District Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Where Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Pending on Claims from Different Patent...

In earlier patent infringement litigation, the Plaintiff sued Ancestry.com DNA, LLC ("Ancestry") in the District of Delaware ("Delaware litigation") alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Number 8,221,381 (the "'381 patent")....more

District Court Refuses to Amend Protective Order to Permit Expert, Who Was Former Employee of Competitor, to Review Confidential...

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, High 5 Games ("High 5"), moved for an order overruling the plaintiff's, Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami"), objection to an expert witness viewing confidential information. In...more

CG Technology v. DraftKings: District Court Stays Discovery Pending Motion to Dismiss Challenging Validity of Asserted Patents...

DraftKings filed a motion to stay discovery until the district court had an opportunity to rule on the a motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss asserted that all of the ten patents-in-suit were invalid because they claimed...more

Oracle v. Google: Violation of Protective Order to Disclose Confidential Information in Open Court

In this long standing litigation between Oracle and Google, a dispute arose over the protective order and whether the disclosure of certain information violated the terms of the protective order when it was disclosed in open...more

District Court Holds that Document Retention and Destruction Policies Are Privileged under Court's Default Discovery Standard

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff sought production of the defendant's document retention and document destruction policies. The defendant asserted that the request sought information protected by work product...more

District Court Declines to Vacate Ruling That Patent Is Invalid for Covering Unpatentable Abstract Ideas after the Parties Settled...

The Plaintiffs filed a patent infringement action against the defendant, Netskope, accusing Netskope of infringing U.S. Patent Number 7,305,707 (the "707 Patent"). Netskope filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which...more

Plaintiff Granted Dismissal Based on Covenant Not to Sue Even With Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pending

The plaintiff, Shipping and Transit, LLC ("Plaintiff"), filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Neptune Cigars, Inc. ("Defendant"), for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,415,207 ("the '207 Patent") and 6,763,299...more

District Court Excludes Damage Expert's Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation

In this patent infringement action between Finjan and Sophos, the district court had previously granted a motion to exclude Finjan's damage expert. The district court explained that the expert's, Layne-Farrar, "method of...more

District Court Denies Request to Preclude Defendant from Sharing Confidential Information of Plaintiff with PTAB as part of Inter...

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec and CaptionCall, CaptionCall filed a motion for relief from the stipulated protective order in order to use confidential commercial information from Ultratec (the...more

District Court Stays Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") over Defendant's Objection That Summary Judgment Motion Should...

After the Patent Trial and Appellate Board ("PTAB") instituted inter partes review ("IPR") of all asserted claims in three of the Patents-in-Suit and with the PTAB's decision on FMC's petition for IPR of the fourth challenged...more

District Court Precludes Damage Expert from Using a Settlement Agreement to Derive a Reasonable Royalty Calculation Where Expert...

MAX Encryption Technologies ("MAZ") filed a patent infringement action against Blackberry for patent entitled "Method of Transparent Encryption and Decryption for an Electronic Document Management System," U.S. Patent No....more

District Court Orders Production of Source Code in Searchable Format

The plaintiff, [24]7 Customer, Inc. ("[24]/7"), filed a lawsuit against Defendant LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") alleging that LivePerson infringed several patents pertaining to a customer engagement software platform. After...more

Sprint v. Comcast: District Court Denies Request for Attorney's Fees Pending Appeal to the Federal Circuit

Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company brought suit against Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast IP Phone, LLC alleging infringement of six of its patents related to telecommunications and data...more

Grecia v. McDonald's: District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Where McDonald's Could Not "Use" System for Patent Infringement...

The plaintiff, Grecia, alleged that McDonald's infringed certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,533,860 ("the '860 patent") and of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,555 ("the '555 patent") through its use of the "tokenization systems" of...more

Murata v. Daifuku: District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Motion for a Second Time After Remand from Federal Circuit Based...

In September 2013, Murata filed a patent infringement action alleging that Daifuku infringed three of its patents (the "Original Patents"). A year later, in September 2014, Murata moved to amend its Complaint to add two...more

EON v. Apple: District Court Permits Plaintiff to Present Technology Tutorial Through Expert Consultant Not Previously Designated

Apple filed an objection to EON's plan to present a technology tutorial through its expert consultant. Apple asserted that the consultant was not disclosed as an expert on whom EON intended to rely upon during claim...more

Boston University v. Everlight: District Court Grants Immediate Appeal Over Whether Lump-Sum Royalty Award Can Be Converted to...

After a jury awarded the Trustees of Boston University ("BU") a $9.3 million dollar one-time lump-sum payment from Epistar and a $4 million dollar one-time lump-sum payment from Everlight, the district court denied the...more

368 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 15

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!