Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Patent Infringement

Share:

District Court Warns Plaintiff That If It Narrows Its Case Too Close to Trial, It Will Have Its Trial Time Reduced

During the pretrial conference, the Plaintiff Arthrex("Arthrex") told the district court that it may be able to narrow its case once the district court resolved certain pending motions for summary judgment. Shortly after the...more

11/28/2016 - Motion for Summary Judgment Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Pretrial Motions

Core Wireless v. LG: District Court Orders Enhanced Damages Based on Defendant's Licensing Discussions

A jury returned a verdict finding that LG infringed the claims of the patent-in-suit and that the claims were not invalid. The jury also found that the infringement was willful. As a result, the district court determined...more

11/22/2016 - Enhanced Damages Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Willful Infringement

District Court Stays Patent Litigation Pending State Court Proceedings That Will Determine Licensing Issue

In this patent infringement action, MMEI, owns U.S. patent 6,234,099 ("the '099 patent"). Fineline Industries, Inc. ("Fineline Inc.") entered into a license agreement with MMEI that permitted Fineline Inc. to use the '099...more

11/17/2016 - Breach of Contract Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing IP License Patent Infringement Royalties Stays

District Court Precludes Defendant from Referring to Plaintiff's Past Settlements as "Nuisance Value" But Allows Amount of Such...

As this patent infringement proceeded closer to trial, the parties filed various motions in limine. The plaintiff, PerDiemco, filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence or argument referring to PerDiem's prior settlements...more

11/15/2016 - Admissible Evidence Motions in Limine Patent Infringement

District Court Orders Plaintiff to Produce Factual Support for Infringement Contentions Regardless of Work Product Doctrine

Huawei and Blackberry filed motions to compel seeking the factual material that the plaintiff, SPH, had relied upon to support its infringement contentions. SPH opposed the motion to compel, arguing that Defendants' requests...more

11/10/2016 - Blackberry Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Work-Product Doctrine

Barry v. Medtronic: District Court Orders Strict Limits on Social Media Contacts with Potential Jurors

As the patent infringement case between Mark Barry, M.D. ("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it intended to provide the parties with a list of potential jurors to assist...more

11/8/2016 - Jury Selection Medtronic Patent Infringement Popular Social Networks Voir Dire

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Infringement Contentions for Doctrine of Equivalents and Indirect Infringement That Did Not...

The defendant filed a motion to strike part of the plaintiff's initial infringement contentions, focusing on infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and indirect infringement. The defendant asserted that the Local...more

11/3/2016 - Doctrine of Equivalents Indirect Infringement Motion To Strike Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

After Plaintiff Asserted Boilerplate Objections to Discovery, District Court Orders Plaintiff's Objections Waived

The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant for patent infringement, trade dress infringement and unfair competition, among other claims, based on the defendants' marketing and selling of portable vaporizers. The...more

11/1/2016 - Discovery Motion to Compel Patent Infringement Trade Dress Unfair Competition

District Court Grants Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction to Preclude Defendant from Discussing Case with Plaintiff's...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant, GHP Group, Inc. ("GHP"), hired the Plaintiff's, ProCom Heating, Inc. ("ProCom"), president during the litigation. The Plaintiff then filed a request for a temporary...more

10/28/2016 - Corporate Officers Patent Infringement Popular Preliminary Injunctions Restraining Orders

District Court Concludes that Plaintiff Is Collaterally Estopped from Asserting Two Related Patents After Court in Another...

In this patent infringement action, the Defendant moved for dismissal based on collateral estoppel and Alice contending that a prior district court had found the patents invalid for lack of patentable subject matter. Before...more

10/25/2016 - Collateral Estoppel Dismissals Issue Preclusion Patent Infringement Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

District Court Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction Where Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Pending on Claims from Different Patent...

In earlier patent infringement litigation, the Plaintiff sued Ancestry.com DNA, LLC ("Ancestry") in the District of Delaware ("Delaware litigation") alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Number 8,221,381 (the "'381 patent")....more

10/21/2016 - Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Refuses to Amend Protective Order to Permit Expert, Who Was Former Employee of Competitor, to Review Confidential...

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, High 5 Games ("High 5"), moved for an order overruling the plaintiff's, Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami"), objection to an expert witness viewing confidential information. In...more

10/19/2016 - Confidential Information Expert Witness Federal Rules of Evidence Patent Infringement Protective Orders

District Court Declines to Vacate Ruling That Patent Is Invalid for Covering Unpatentable Abstract Ideas after the Parties Settled...

The Plaintiffs filed a patent infringement action against the defendant, Netskope, accusing Netskope of infringing U.S. Patent Number 7,305,707 (the "707 Patent"). Netskope filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which...more

10/4/2016 - Appeals Motion for Judgment Motion to Vacate Patent Infringement Settlement

Plaintiff Granted Dismissal Based on Covenant Not to Sue Even With Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pending

The plaintiff, Shipping and Transit, LLC ("Plaintiff"), filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Neptune Cigars, Inc. ("Defendant"), for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,415,207 ("the '207 Patent") and 6,763,299...more

9/29/2016 - Covenant Not to Sue Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Subject Matter Jurisdiction

District Court Excludes Damage Expert's Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation

In this patent infringement action between Finjan and Sophos, the district court had previously granted a motion to exclude Finjan's damage expert. The district court explained that the expert's, Layne-Farrar, "method of...more

9/27/2016 - Apportionment Expert Witness Motion to Exclude Patent Infringement Royalties

District Court Denies Request to Preclude Defendant from Sharing Confidential Information of Plaintiff with PTAB as part of Inter...

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec and CaptionCall, CaptionCall filed a motion for relief from the stipulated protective order in order to use confidential commercial information from Ultratec (the...more

9/22/2016 - Confidential Information Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Patent Infringement Protective Orders

District Court Precludes Damage Expert from Using a Settlement Agreement to Derive a Reasonable Royalty Calculation Where Expert...

MAX Encryption Technologies ("MAZ") filed a patent infringement action against Blackberry for patent entitled "Method of Transparent Encryption and Decryption for an Electronic Document Management System," U.S. Patent No....more

9/15/2016 - Blackberry Encryption Expert Testimony Patent Infringement Royalties Settlement Agreements

District Court Orders Production of Source Code in Searchable Format

The plaintiff, [24]7 Customer, Inc. ("[24]/7"), filed a lawsuit against Defendant LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") alleging that LivePerson infringed several patents pertaining to a customer engagement software platform. After...more

9/13/2016 - Online Platforms Patent Infringement Source Code

Sprint v. Comcast: District Court Denies Request for Attorney's Fees Pending Appeal to the Federal Circuit

Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company brought suit against Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast IP Phone, LLC alleging infringement of six of its patents related to telecommunications and data...more

9/7/2016 - Attorney's Fees Comcast Corporate Counsel Motion for Judgment Patent Infringement Sprint Telecommunications

Grecia v. McDonald's: District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Where McDonald's Could Not "Use" System for Patent Infringement...

The plaintiff, Grecia, alleged that McDonald's infringed certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,533,860 ("the '860 patent") and of U.S. Patent No. 8,402,555 ("the '555 patent") through its use of the "tokenization systems" of...more

9/7/2016 - Credit Cards Direct Infringement Dismissals McDonalds Patent Infringement Payment Processors

Murata v. Daifuku: District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Motion for a Second Time After Remand from Federal Circuit Based...

In September 2013, Murata filed a patent infringement action alleging that Daifuku infringed three of its patents (the "Original Patents"). A year later, in September 2014, Murata moved to amend its Complaint to add two...more

9/2/2016 - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding Leave to Amend Patent Infringement Preliminary Injunctions Remand Stays

District Court Denies Apple's Request to Add Acacia into Patent Infringement Lawsuit as Alter Ego of Plaintiff

In this patent infringement action, Apple filed a motion to add additional Acacia entities as plaintiffs in the action. Apple's primary argue was that the Acacia entities were the alter egos of the plaintiff and that the...more

8/23/2016 - Alter Ego Apple Attorney's Fees Patent Infringement Popular

District Court Denies Request for Production of Documents Provided to Prospective Litigation Funding Organizations

In this patent infringement action, the defendant sought the production of documents that the plaintif, IOENGINGE, had provided to potential companies that could fund litigation. IOENGINGED claimed that the documents were...more

8/17/2016 - Document Productions Patent Infringement Work-Product Doctrine

District Court Excludes Evidence of Lost Profits Where Inventor Did Not Make Products That Practiced the Patent Even Though a...

In this patent infringement action, the defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of any claimed lost profits damages alleged by the plaintiff, the inventor of the patent-in-suit. The defendants asserted that...more

8/15/2016 - Inventors Lost Profits Motion to Exclude Motions in Limine Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Grants Motion to Strike Errata Changing Deposition Answers from a "Yes" to a "No"

In this patent infringement action, the defendants filed a motion to strike an errata change to the deposition testimony of a witness, Joseph Tindall. The district court noted that if the errata were allowed, it would change...more

8/12/2016 - Depositions Motion To Strike Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Rule 30(e) Testimony Young Lawyers

230 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 10

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×