Stanley Gibson

Stanley Gibson

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Patent Infringement

Share:

District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at issue in the case. The defendants argued that two district courts had already...more

2/9/2016 - Citigroup Motion for Summary Judgment Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation The Patent Act

Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial process that it was seeking to introduce evidence of copying as an indication...more

2/5/2016 - Admissible Evidence Motion to Exclude Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until...

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,346,876 ("the '876 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 6,737,989 ("the '989...more

2/2/2016 - Burden of Proof Clear and Convincing Evidence Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation

District Court Denies Request for Contempt Where Defendant Continued to Provide Repairs and Replacement Parts to Enjoined Devices

Plaintiff Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "ATD") filed an ex parte application for a judgment of civil contempt against Defendant Ridge Corporation's ("Defendant" or "Ridge") for allegedly violating of the...more

1/18/2016 - Contempt Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent...

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury returned a $30 million award in favor of Prism, Prism filed a motion for an...more

1/8/2016 - Damages Jury Instructions Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Royalties Sprint

eDekka Gets Decked by Finding of Exceptional Case in the Eastern District of Texas

Plaintiff eDekka LLC ("eDekka") sued a large number of defendants in Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,266,674 ("the '674 Patent") titled "Random Access Information Retrieval Utilizing User...more

1/5/2016 - Attorney's Fees CLS Bank v Alice Corp Complex Litigation Exceptional Case Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter SCOTUS

District Court Declines to Modify Claim Construction Based on PTAB Denial of IPR

Adidas AG ("Adidas"), filed a patent infringement action against Under Armour, Inc. ("Under Armour") and MapMyFitness, Inc. ("MapMyFitness") alleging that they infringed over a dozen patents. After Under Armour and...more

12/31/2015 - Adidas Claim Construction Markman Hearing Patent Infringement

District Court Denies Request for Finding of Exceptional Case Where Plaintiff Pursued and Lost Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Moblize contended that TDE Petroleum Data Solutions, Inc ("TDE") either knew or should have known that its motion for preliminary injunction was meritless and that it was brought for the improper purpose of harassing Moblize....more

12/28/2015 - Exceptional Case Patent Infringement Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Preliminary Injunctions

District Court Denies Discovery Served Too Close to Discovery Cut-Off

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action, alleging that Defendant B2B Supply and Defendant Jerrell P. Squyres (hereinafter "Defendants") infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,731,462 (the '462 patent). Toward the end of discovery,...more

12/23/2015 - Additional Discovery Discovery Patent Infringement

District Court Grants Sanctions Reducing Number of 30(b)(6) Depositions, Awarding Costs to Plaintiff and with a Warning that...

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff filed a motion for discovery sanctions. The plaintiff argued in its motion that defendant failed to comply with the district court's October 7, 2015 oral discovery order and...more

12/21/2015 - Depositions Discovery Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Rule 30(b)(6) Sanctions

A Snapshot of University Patent Litigation

As patent litigation overall has grown rapidly since 2010, the industry has also seen a shift in some traditionally litigation averse players. University tech transfer organizations in particular have increased their filings...more

12/18/2015 - Apple Carnegie Mellon Johns Hopkins Non-Practicing Entities Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trolls Popular Universities

District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing Where Plaintiff Could Not Establish That It Owned All Substantial...

Plaintiff Max Sound Corporation ("Max Sound") filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") against three defendants: Google, Inc., YouTube, LLC and On2 Technologies (collectively, "Defendants"), for the infringement of Patent No....more

12/14/2015 - Alter Ego Google License Agreements Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Patent Ownership Standing YouTube

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Denied Where Complaint Alleged Sufficient Facts to Establish...

Defendant's filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion, contending that Plaintiffs lacked standing because no case or controversy existed at the time Plaintiffs filed the complaint. Defendant argued...more

12/9/2015 - Injury-in-Fact Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Standing Subject Matter Jurisdiction

District Court Declines Request to Vacate Claim Construction Order after Parties Enter into Consent Judgment

Canvs filed a patent infringement action in 2014 asserting that Nivisys induced and contributed to the infringement of its patent through the sale of TACS and TACS-M products. After a lengthy stay, the district court held a...more

12/3/2015 - Claim Construction Collateral Estoppel Markman Hearing Patent Infringement Patent Litigation

District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing Where Co-Owners of Patent Were Not Joined in Original Complaint But...

Cobra International, Inc. ("Cobra") filed a patent infringement action against Defendants for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,821,858 ("the '858 patent"). Cobra alleged that the '858 patent was issued to Allan J. Stone, who...more

11/27/2015 - IP Assignment Agreements Joint Inventors Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Standing

District Court Denies TRO and Preliminary Injunction Where Speculation on Future Harm Did Not Show Likely Irreparable Harm

Plaintiff SATA GmbH & Co. KG ("Plaintiff") sought an ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants Zhejiang Refine Wufu Air Tools Co., Ltd. ("Wufu")...more

11/23/2015 - Counterfeiting Design Patent Irreparable Harm Patent Infringement Preliminary Injunctions Trademark Infringement TRO

District Court Administratively Terminates Motion to Dismiss Because of Pending Inter Partes Reviews ("IPRs")

In this patent infringement action, Watson Laboratories, Inc.'s ("Watson") moved to dismiss several counts of the complaint filed by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited (collectively, "Jazz")....more

11/18/2015 - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Pharmaceutical Patents

Aylus v. Apple: Apple Moves to Strike Supplemental Expert Report Served After Expert Deposition and at the End of the Expert...

After Aylus timely served the report of its technical expert, Daniel Schonfeld, and Apple deposed the expert, Aylus served a "First Supplemental Expert Report of Dan Schonfeld" at the end of the expert discovery period. Apple...more

11/16/2015 - Apple v Samsung Joint Infringement Patent Infringement Right to Control Supplemental Evidence

Plaintiff Seeks to Substitute Damage Expert after Expert Retires

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff sought to substitute its damage expert because its current damage expert had retired. The plaintiff also sought to withdraw the retired expert's damage report....more

11/4/2015 - Expert Witness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

WARF v. Apple: Motion to Exclude Live Witness Granted Where Apple Had Previously Sought to Rely Solely on Deposition Testimony

As the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation ("WARF") patent infringement case against Apple approached trial, Apple attempted to call a witness live that it had previously informed WARF's counsel would be called by...more

10/28/2015 - Apple Depositions Expert Witness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

After Granting Motion for Summary Judgment on Issue of Non-Infringement, District Court Orders Parties to Proceed to Bench Trial...

The District Court granted Transcend's motion for summary judgment on the issue of non-infringement and denied the patent owner's, Glaukos', motion on the issue of inequitable conduct. The District Court then set a bench...more

10/26/2015 - Inequitable Conduct Noninfringement Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Summary Judgment

District Court Declines to Admit Denial of Petition for Inter Partes Review ("IPR") into Evidence before Jury

In a pending patent infringement action, Apple moved to preclude the plaintiff, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundations ("WARF") from offering evidence or argument regarding the Patent Office's denial of an IPR that Apple...more

10/21/2015 - Apple Evidence Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Prior Art USPTO

District Court Denies Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Where Third Parties Filed IPRs and Defendants...

In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. ("Signal") alleged that Defendants Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and Fiat Chrysler US LLC ("FCA") (collectively "Defendants") infringed upon six of patents. The...more

10/19/2015 - Chrysler Ford Motor Inter Partes Reexamination Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Patents Validity

Even though Defendant filed Disguised Daubert Motion that Court Called "Untimely" and "Lame," the District Court Granted the...

In this patent infringement action, Defendant R/X Automation Solutions filed a motion in limine to exclude one of plaintiff's experts. The district court concluded that the motion was an untimely Daubert motion because the...more

10/13/2015 - Daubert Standards Expert Testimony Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

District Court Excludes 15 Prior Art References Not Disclosed in Invalidity Contentions

In this patent infringement action, Plaintiffs filed motions in limine to exclude 15 prior art references that defendants intend to use to show the state of the art pertinent to the patents-in-suit. Defendants included the 15...more

10/8/2015 - Motions in Limine Patent Infringement Patent-in-Suit Patents Prior Art

166 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 7

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×