Stephen B. Maebius

Stephen B. Maebius

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Estoppel Prevents Second IPR Petition Even When New References Were Missed By First Search

In a case that appears to be a case of first impression, the PTAB found in its decision denying institution in IPR2016-00781 that a final written decision in an earlier IPR created estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1),...more

9/2/2016 - Appeals Due Diligence Estoppel Final Judgment Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents

Keeping Up To Date On CRISPR – July 2016

CRISPR is a gene editing technique that promises to revolutionize genetic engineering, but already is raising ethical, business, and legal issues. This is the first in a monthly series of articles on CRISPR. ...more

8/2/2016 - Bioengineering China Clinical Trials CRISPR DNA Human Genes Human Genome Project

Magnum Offers New Path for Challenging AIA Decisions: Burden of Production

On July 25, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held in In re Magnum Oil Tools International (Newman, O’Malley & Chen) that the burden of production to show unobviousness does not shift to a patent owner...more

8/1/2016 - Burden of Proof Burden-Shifting CAFC Corporate Counsel Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Petition For Rehearing Prior Art USPTO

Survey of Pharmaceutical IPRs Filed By Generic Drug Company Petitioners

We have reviewed a sub-group of 111 IPRs filed by generic drug companies against pharmaceutical patents to assess outcomes and trends. While our survey was not intended to capture every IPR filed by a generic drug company, it...more

6/9/2016 - Generic Drugs Inter Partes Review Proceedings Joinder Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Pharmaceutical Patents Settlement Surveys

Reading The Cuozzo Tea Leaves: Best Practices Pending The Supreme Court's Decision

The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument today on claim construction in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and the reviewability of institution decisions. On the claim construction issue, the Justices...more

4/29/2016 - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee Inter Partes Review Proceedings Judicial Review Mandamus Petitions Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board SCOTUS USPTO

Guarding Against Conclusory Statements & Why It Matters Even More Under The New PTAB Rules

A common deficiency highlighted in recent PTAB decisions denying institution of an IPR petition is that an expert declaration offers only “conclusory” statements in relation to one or more key aspects of the alleged ground of...more

4/12/2016 - Expert Testimony Inter Partes Review Proceedings New Regulations Patent Litigation Patent Owner Preliminary Response Patent Trial and Appeal Board

USPTO Releases New Rules For AIA Post-Grant Proceedings

On March 31, 2016, the USPTO released its long-awaited package of rules for AIA post-grant proceedings. The final rules largely track the proposed rules (see “USPTO Proposes Extensive Changes to AIA Post-Grant Proceedings” to...more

4/4/2016 - America Invents Act Final Rules Genuine Issue of Material Fact Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Owner Preliminary Response Patent Trial and Appeal Board Post-Grant Review USPTO USPTO Pilot Program

Patent Due Diligence: All That Glitters May Not Be PTAB Gold

An obvious but sometimes overlooked item when conducting patent due diligence is to check for PTAB proceedings (CBM, IPR, or PGR). Although the Patent Application Information Retrieval System (PAIR) does show whether patents...more

3/25/2016 - America Invents Act Covered Business Method Proceedings Due Diligence Estoppel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Post-Grant Review

PTAB Institutes Kyle Bass IPR Against Pharmaceutical Patent Based On SEC Document

Kyle Bass has filed numerous prior IPR petitions against pharmaceutical patents, some of which have been denied due to use of prior art references that were not sufficiently proven to be “publicly accessible” (see “Clinical...more

3/17/2016 - Clinical Trials Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Pharmaceutical Patents Printed Publications Prior Art Public Disclosure

The Latest Twist In The Apple v. VirnetX IPRs: Appeals Court Issues Temporary Stay

On March 7, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a temporary stay to permit briefing by the parties on the question of whether the PTAB properly ruled that Apple could use the joinder process in Mangrove Capital’s IPR against...more

3/11/2016 - Apple Inter Partes Review Proceedings Joinder Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Stays Writ of Mandamus

VirnetX Faces Follow-on IPR Petition from a Different Petitioner After Settling Previously Instituted IPR

In IPR2014-00614, Microsoft filed a petition for IPR against US Patent No. 7,418,504 (“the ‘504 patent) owned by VirnetX, which was instituted based upon anticipation grounds over Kiuchi (see institution decision). This IPR...more

3/8/2016 - America Invents Act Anticipation Apple Damages Inter Partes Review Proceedings Microsoft Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

CAFC Partially Relaxes IdleFree Requirements for Amendments During IPR

On February 11, 2016, in Nike v. Adidas (Fed. Cir. 2016), the Federal Circuit partially relaxed the hurdle for a patent owner to amend claims during an IPR or other AIA proceeding. This follows the PTAB’s own earlier partial...more

2/15/2016 - America Invents Act CAFC Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion to Amend Nike Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Prior Art

High Stakes Race Between Apple and VirnetX: Will PTAB Trump The Texas Jury's Award of $326.5M?

A Texas jury today raised the stakes even higher in a race involving parallel proceedings between the PTAB and Texas district court when it found that Apple infringed the VirnetX patents and awarded to VirnetX $625.6M in...more

2/5/2016 - Apple Damages Inter Partes Review Proceedings Joinder Jury Awards Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Willful Infringement

Supreme Court Accepts 1st IPR Appeal: Cuozzo Could Mark Turning Point for Patent Owners

On January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cuozzo Speed v. Lee, which represents the first time the high Court will address an AIA proceeding, in this case an IPR decision. Based on the questions presented...more

1/19/2016 - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Certiorari Claim Construction Cuozzo Speed Technologies Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board Post-Grant Review SCOTUS

Federal Circuit Backs PTAB Decision Curtailing A Party's Use Of "Supplemental" Information

In Redline Detection v. Star Envirotech, the Federal Circuit confirmed that the PTAB can decline to consider timely filed “supplemental” information from a petitioner (after filing its petition) pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §...more

1/11/2016 - Agency Deference Corporate Counsel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Supplemental Information

Federal Circuit Confirms Constitutionality of IPR Proceedings

On December 3, 2015, in MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a panel of the Federal Circuit unanimously upheld the constitutionality of IPR proceedings, finding that delegation of patent invalidity determinations to a...more

1/7/2016 - America Invents Act Article III Hewlett-Packard Inter Partes Review Proceedings Jury Trial Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Use of Priority Denial to Subject Apparent "Pre-AIA" Patents to PGR: Inguran v. Premium Genetics

A recent decision by the PTAB, Inguran v. Premium Genetics, demonstrates that a Petitioner may subject an apparent “pre-AIA” patent, having at least one priority date before and at least one priority date after March 16,...more

1/7/2016 - First-to-File Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Applications Patent Trial and Appeal Board Post-Grant Review Standing Written Descriptions

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's IPR Decision Invalidating A Pharmaceutical Patent

On December 17, 2015, in Merck v. Gnosis, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s IPR Decision finding a pharmaceutical patent invalid for obviousness. Justice Newman vigorously dissented from the majority’s view (Justices...more

1/7/2016 - En Banc Review Inter Partes Review Proceedings Merck Obviousness Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Pharmaceutical Patents Substantial Evidence Standard

Proposed Rule Changes For IPR Appeals

On December 3, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued a notice of proposed changes to its Rules of Practice, many of which relate to IPR practice under the AIA... Some of the proposed changes impact the manner by which appeals from...more

1/7/2016 - America Invents Act Appellate Briefs Confidential Information Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board USPTO

Several hedge fund-linked IPR Petitions Instituted: PTAB Finds No Abuse of Process

Following a string of denials, the PTAB has recently instituted IPR against several pharmaceutical patents where the petitions were filed by entities linked to hedge funds. Prior to these recent institution decisions, there...more

1/7/2016 - Abuse of Process America Invents Act Hedge Funds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Estoppel Versus Discretion: How is the PTAB Deciding Multiple Petitions Against the Same Patent?

The PTAB has denied petitions filed by the same petitioner against the same claims, even where the subsequent petition relied upon completely different prior art (IPR2014-00506), reasoning that a petitioner should not hold...more

9/24/2015 - Estoppel Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Prior Art

PTAB Requests Additional Briefing on Hedge Fund IPR Questions: A Decision May Be Near

On Sept. 1, 2015, the PTAB issued an order in Coalition for Affordable Drugs (CFAD) v. NPS Pharmaceuticals for the parties to brief the following questions in 7 business days...more

9/4/2015 - Abuse of Process Hedge Funds Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Standing

Kyle Bass Loses Round 1 of IPR Attack Against Pharma/Biotech Patents

On August 24, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) declined institution of two petitions filed by Coalition For Affordable Drugs for Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) of Acorda’s patents (U.S. Patent Nos: 8,007,826,...more

8/28/2015 - Abuse of Process Biotechnology Generic Drugs Hedge Funds Information Disclosure Statement Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Owner Preliminary Response Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents Prior Art Real Party in Interest

What Is the Latest on Amendments in PTAB Proceedings?

Among other topics, a recent web conference hosted by George Quillin and Jeff Costakos tackled the latest developments in amendment practice before the PTAB. The conference addressed the very recent Federal Circuit...more

8/28/2015 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Motion to Amend Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Ownership Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Post-Grant Review Prior Art

46 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×