Todd Kerr

Todd Kerr

Perkins Coie

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Halliburton: SCOTUS Reaffirms Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption, Allows Attack at Class Cert Stage

On Monday the Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317, 2014 WL 2807181 (U.S. June 23, 2014), rejecting all pleas to overturn the fraud-on-the-market...more

6/27/2014 - Basic v Levinson Class Certification Fraud Fraud-on-the-Market Halliburton Halliburton v Erica P. John Fund Presumption of Reliance SCOTUS Securities Fraud

Supreme Court Holds That SLUSA Does Not Preempt State Law Claims Of Investors In Stanford Ponzi Scheme

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the scope of the preemption of state law class actions afforded by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice, No. 12-79 (U.S....more

3/4/2014 - Chadbourne & Parke LLP v Troice Ponzi Scheme Preemption SCOTUS SLUSA

Supreme Court Holds Securities Fraud Class Certification Does Not Require Showing Of Materiality, With Strong Dissents Questioning...

In its long-awaited decision in Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds, No. 11-1085 (U.S. Feb. 27, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court held that plaintiffs in a securities-fraud class action do not need to...more

3/7/2013 - Amgen Inc. v Connecticut Retirement Plans Class Action Class Certification Fraud Fraud-on-the-Market SCOTUS Securities Exchange Act

Arizona Supreme Court Follows Central Bank: No Implied Private Right Of Action For Aiding And Abetting Securities Fraud Under The...

Earlier today, in a case titled Sell v. Sewell, et al. (No. CV-12-0211-PR), the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that there is no implied private right of action for aiding and abetting securities fraud under the Arizona...more

2/25/2013 - Aiding and Abetting Private Right of Action Securities Fraud

4 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1