Todd Mobley

Todd Mobley

Proskauer Rose LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

Defendants See Success With Limitations Defenses Post Heimeshoff

Defendants have recently received three favorable decisions involving contractual and statutory limitations defenses. In each case, a federal court held that claims for benefits under ERISA plans were time-barred. Costa v....more

3/13/2014 - ERISA Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. SCOTUS Statute of Limitations

U.S. Supreme Court: A Decision on the Merits Triggers the Time to Appeal Irrespective of a Pending Contractual or Statutory...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous opinion that an unresolved claim for attorney’s fees does not prevent a decision on the merits of an ERISA suit from becoming final for purposes of the deadline to file a notice of...more

1/28/2014 - Appeals Appellate Rules Attorney's Fees ERISA Ray Haluch Gravel v International Union of Operating Engineers SCOTUS

District Court Upholds Validity of IRS Rule Authorizing Premium Tax Credits to Individuals Who Enroll in Health-Care Coverage...

A district court in the District of Columbia recently held that the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) rule authorizing premium tax credits to individuals who enroll in health-care coverage through federal exchanges was...more

1/27/2014 - Affordable Care Act Health Insurance Exchanges Healthcare Individual Mandate IRS Premiums Tax Credits

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - January 2014

This month we look at part three of our three part series on Class Actions. In part three, Robert Rachal and M. Todd Mobley address the role of experts in class certification post Wal-Mart and Comcast and how to use and...more

1/21/2014 - Blue Cross Burden of Proof Cafeteria Plans Class Action Class Certification Comcast Contraceptive Coverage Mandate Daubert Standards Discrimination ERISA Flexible Spending Accounts General Motors Health Savings Accounts Human Resources Professionals IRA Predominance Requirement Rule 23 Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS Subject Matter Experts Wal-Mart

New FAQs Provide Guidance Regarding Effect of ACA on the MHPAEA

As previously reported, the federal agencies responsible for drafting the rules implementing the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) (the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S....more

1/17/2014 - Affordable Care Act MHPAEA

Federal District Court Tosses $450 Million Retiree Health Care Suit Against GM

A federal district court in Michigan dismissed a breach-of-contract suit against General Motors over a $450 million payment for retiree medical benefits. Int’l Union, UAW v. Gen. Motors, LLC, No. 10-11366, 2013 U.S. Dist....more

12/24/2013 - Breach of Contract Compliance Employee Benefits General Motors Healthcare Retirement Plan

Valid Assignment Confers Beneficiary Status on Chiropractor

A federal district court in Illinois recently issued a pair of rulings in cases where insurers sought to recoup payments from practitioners. Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, 2013...more

12/9/2013 - Assignments Beneficiaries ERISA

Seventh Circuit Again Grants Class Certification In Excessive Fee Case

On remand from the Seventh Circuit, a federal district court in Illinois granted class certification in a case where participants in a Boeing 401(k) plan alleged that Boeing breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA by: (i)...more

10/17/2013 - 401k Boeing Class Action Class Certification Disclosure Requirements ERISA Fees Fiduciary Duty Mutual Funds

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - September 2013

Editor's Overview - Health care issues make the headlines once again in this month's ERISA Litigation Newsletter. Tzvia Feiertag first provides practical and timely tips for insured ERISA health plan sponsors on...more

9/18/2013 - Benefit Plan Sponsors DOL DOMA Employee Benefits ERISA Healthcare MLR Rebate Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS US v Windsor

The Post-DOMA World Relating to ERISA-Governed Employee Benefit Plans

As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), in which the Court held that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) was unconstitutional, same-sex...more

9/11/2013 - DOMA Employee Benefits ERISA IRS Marriage Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS US v Windsor

11 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1