Electronic Discovery Updates

Read Electronic Discovery updates, articles, and commentary from leading lawyers, law firms, and legal consultants:
News & Analysis as of

Are you Certifiable?

It is not unusual for opposing counsel to demand that you “certify” that your client’s document production is complete and correct. What does this mean? Are you required to do it? The issue often arises in...more

Noteworthy Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Regarding E-Discovery

The proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) we have all been waiting for have finally been approved by the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (“Standing Committee”). Before these...more

10 Characteristics of an Ideal Managed Services Provider

In our last post, we considered internal factors that organizations should evaluate when deciding whether and how to allocate responsibility for e-discovery between in-house and external resources. However, as they choose the...more

Status Updates - July 2014 #3

..A relatively new site called Wanelo combines the features of a social media site and an e-commerce site by permitting users to “save” products that they are interested in, and showing them to their online friends. The site...more

Fitting a Solution to Meet the Needs of a Workflow In-House

Your law firm just purchased a license for e-discovery software. Now what? Software implementations can be a substantial challenge for a variety of reasons, including lack of executive buy-in, poorly defined requirements,...more

ESI Discovery Best Practices, Part 3: You’ve identified ESI, now how do you go about collecting it?

My last blog generally addressed the rules applicable to best practices as to identification of Electronically Stored Information (ESI). Once the data identification process is complete, the next step is to determine...more

ESI Discovery Best Practices, Part 4 – Collection of ESI – Who should be doing it?

There is an ongoing debate about who should conduct ESI collection. This is critical, primarily because if collection is done improperly, it could lead to inadmissibility at trial, sanctions or both....more

Matching the Solution to the Needs, not the Needs to the Solution

With the e-discovery services market in the U.S. exploding–estimated to exceed $3 billion by 2018–with double digit revenue growth of approximately 15% based on Gartner’s 2014 Magic Quadrant for E-Discovery Software, many...more

A Primer on Technological Advances in E-Discovery

“E-discovery is pervasive. It’s like understanding civil procedure. You’re not going to be a civil litigator without understanding the rules of civil procedure. Similarly, you’re no longer going to be able to conduct...more

Lessons From A Cautionary Tale of Electronic Discovery Pitfalls in Health Care Litigation

E-discovery is especially challenging in healthcare related litigation due to the healthcare industry’s reliance on electronically stored information (ESI), the volume of medical records often at issue in health care...more

Massachusetts High Court Permits Compelled Decryption of Seized Digital Evidence

Today, in Commonwealth v. Gelfgatt, No. SJC-11358 (Mass. June 25, 2014), a divided Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that under certain circumstances, a court may compel a criminal defendant to provide the password to...more

Highlights of the UARG v. EPA Decision

On Monday, the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA, No. 12–1146 (June 23, 2013) limited EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) under the Clean Air Act, reversing in part and affirming...more

Achieve Organizational Goals by Taking a Managed Services Approach to E-Discovery

With data volumes skyrocketing and the costs of litigation following a similar trajectory, organizations are exploring alternative models for managing e-discovery aside from the traditional model of outsourcing parts (or all)...more

Play Nice: Recent eDiscovery Decision Emphasizes Consistent Cooperation

In the weeks since Magistrate Judge Leen denied a late request to use predictive coding in a case before her, the e-discovery world is still abuzz over certain language included in her ruling. In the case in question,...more

Oil and Gas Companies Ask Colorado Supreme Court to Approve Trial Court Order Requiring Plaintiffs to Present Preliminary Evidence...

On June 18th, Antero Resources Corp., Antero Resources Piceance Corp, Calfrac Well Services Corp, and Frontier Drilling LLC filed their Opening Brief before the Colorado Supreme Court in a “toxic tort” case concerning...more

Standing Committee Approves Proposed Revised Rule 37(e)

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (Standing Committee) recently approved a revised Rule 37(e), which is intended to establish greater uniformity in the ways federal courts respond to the loss of electronically...more

Expedited Procedures in New York Courts Guarantee Trial in Just Nine Months

Earlier this month, New York's Commercial Division, a department within the New York State court system designed to handle complex commercial disputes, established new procedures that provide a voluntary, alternative track to...more

Embedded Metadata: Out of Sight, Out of Mind

Most of us have created a new file using an old one as a template. Although we save the file under a separate, new name, the embedded metadata from the old file, such as tracked changes or comments in Microsoft Word,...more

Non-Parties And Electronic Discovery: Limiting The Scope And Cost Of Responding To Invasive Rule 45 Subpoenas

“[D]iscovery is by definition invasive [and] parties to a law suit must accept its travails as a natural concomitant of modern civil litigation.” But “[n]on parties have a different set of expectations” and discovery aimed at...more

Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Clear Another Hurdle

Earlier this year, we provided an update on the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subsequently, the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules submitted a slate of modified proposed amendments to the...more

How Not to Thwart the Progress of Technology-Assisted Review

Recent case law has shown strong support for the use of technology-assisted review (TAR): its accuracy and efficiency have been praised by judges and parties alike. However, despite her approval of the process as a “far more...more

Cloud Computing Is a Hot Topic… in Business and the Courtroom

Cloud computing sales are poised to triple by 2017, according to IHS Technology. With growth comes competition and the potential for disputes, both intellectual property-related and otherwise. This article surveys some of the...more

Electronic Discovery: Are We Competent?

The State Bar of California has issued perhaps the country’s most straightforward and candid directive to litigators to learn the ins and outs of electronic discovery (e-discovery). In a proposed formal opinion, it states,...more

You Can Run, But You Can’t Hide From Sanctions in Discovery

In an October 2013 order in Digital Vending Services International, Inc. v. University of Phoenix, the judge refused to grant the defendants’ request for spoliation sanctions but punished the plaintiff for its disclosure of...more

Latest Trends in E-Discovery: The Focus on Proportionality and Cooperation

When asked what has been the most significant development in federal litigation during his time on the bench, United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola of the D.C. District responded, simply: “the impact upon the...more

1,291 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 52

Follow Electronic Discovery Updates on: