Business Organization Professional Malpractice Mergers & Acquisitions

Read Business Organization updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Individual Accountability and the SEC

From the 2016 PLUS D&O Symposium session “The DOJ, SEC and the New Era of Individual Accountability,” Helen Cantwell (Debevoise & Plimpton) and Stephanie Avakian, Esq. (U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission) discuss...more

Reps & Warranties Insurance on the Rise

From the 2015 PLUS Conference session “Playing to Win – Strategic Use of Reps & Warranties Insurance,” panelist Matthew Heinz (Aon Transaction Solutions) discusses reasons why reps and warranties insurance is being purchased more frequently and how it is being used. In early February the focus of the D&O world will be the PLUS D&O Symposium in Manhattan. If D&O insurance issues are important to you then don’t miss the industry event of the year – there’s still time to register!more

Financial Advisor Found Liable for Aiding and Abetting Director Breaches of Fiduciary Duties in Connection With Cash-Out Merger - Ruling follows four-day trial in In re Rural/Metro Corporation Stockholders Litigation, No. 6350-VCL (Delaware Chancery, March 7, 2014)

In a 91-page post-trial decision, Chancellor Travis Laster found RBC Capital Markets LLC (“RBC”) liable for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with RBC’s role as a financial advisor in the 2011 $438 million buyout of Rural/Metro Corporation (“Rural”). RBC is the investment banking arm of the Royal Bank of Canada and acted for Rural, the target company.more

Next Battlefield in Dewey Liquidation: Pursuing Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims

Dewey & LeBoeuf’s inglorious galactic implosion changes all of the rules; it was not too big to fail, it was, however, far too big and corroded to fail in the relatively orderly way others before it failed. The next battlefronts in this immense tragedy are likely to be pretty massive and probably fairly scandalous breach of fiduciary duty claims, fought on a level and at a pitch never seen before. These battles are going to be completely unseemly and they will probably suck in a host of law firms that made homes for Dewey refugees. Thus may result in a form of tribal warfare never before seen in Western society. Rarely has the gap between assets and liabilities of a failed law firm been as wide as they appear to be in Dewey & LeBoeuf’s case. With liabilities thus far reported at about $315,000,000 (which may ultimately come close to doubling) and assets of a mere $215,000,000 (which may eventually realize less than half that amount of cash), there just doesn’t look like there is much there there, particularly when we consider that of its liabilities listed thus far, some $225,000,000 is secured debt, the lion’s share now owned by vulture funds, which reportedly much much of this debt at fifty cents or so on the dollar. They don’t call these guys vulture investors without reason. They are smart and omnivorous. They probably expect to double their investments and will do so by picking away at every morsel of the carcass and anything edible within range. They are not like traditional banks or landlords; they have no expectation of doing business of doing business with these lawyers or their new law firms and aren’t going to be anything but single-minded in squeezing every ounce of blood from every stone. In light of this, every remaining constituency, particularly former partners, who are seeking to avoid as much pain as possible and general unsecured creditors are presumably plumbing worn legal texts and laying out battle plans for both offensive battles and planning out defenses for what may be pitched battles. Here, then, is an early assessment of the order of battle for global breach of fiduciary duty claims which stands every likelihood of deploying scores of lawyers in fratricidal battles that will last for many years and will forever change the landscape of BigLaw and most certainly lateral recruiting will never be quite the same. more

“Fair Is Foul, And Foul Is Fair”, But Are “Fair Value” And “Fair Market Value” Synonymous?

Last Friday, I wrote in this post about a recent Nevada Supreme Court decision that provides a modicum of guidance on how “fair value” is to be determined for purposes of Nevada’s dissenters’ rights law. California’s dissenters’ rights law doesn’t refer to “fair value”. Rather, California uses the term “fair market value”. According to Professor Harold Marsh, Jr., the use of the term “fair market value” dates back to 1939 when it was substituted for the phrase “fair cash value”. H. Marsh, Jr., R. Finkle, & L. Sonsini, Marsh’s California Corporation Law § 20.05[A] (4th ed.). Please see full article below for more information. more

5 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

Follow Business Organization Updates on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×