News & Analysis as of

Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Science, Computers & Technology

Read Civil Procedure updates, alerts, news, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:

Mylan Institutional LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Last week, the Federal Circuit reviewed the rare event of a preliminary injunction being granted in a lawsuit over a chemical invention, made rarer still by the evidence of likelihood of success on the merits required for the...more

BPCIA Litigation Roundup (Spring 2017)

by Goodwin on

Below is our spring update on the U.S. patent litigations concerning proposed or approved biosimilar products. For additional details, please consult our BPCIA Litigation Summary Chart or our previous quarterly updates...more

TC Heartland: The End of an Era in Patent Litigation

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On Monday, May 22, the Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, overruling the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), and...more

Supreme Court to review policy of partial institution of inter partes reviews

by Dentons on

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari and will review Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice involving instituting review on fewer than all patent claims challenged in an inter partes review (IPR) petition....more

Function/Way/Result Test Causes Headaches in Chemical Cases; Substitute Insubstantial Differences Test

In Mylan Institutional LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., [2017-1645] (May 19, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of a preliminary injunction against the infringement of U.S. Patent 9,353,050 on a triarylmethane dye...more

Delaware - The New Black For Patent Litigation?

by SmithAmundsen LLC on

This week the Supreme Court made the problem of deciding where to incorporate a little more complicated. Sure, your company could still choose Delaware for its well-developed business laws. But how does Delaware stack up in...more

Supreme Court Limits Venue in Patent Litigation

In an 8-0 decision issued on May 22, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, restricted the available venues for patent litigation claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1400. Under Section...more

Back to the Future: Supreme Court Narrows Patent Venue in TC Heartland Case and Returns Dispute to State of Incorporation or Where...

by Williams Mullen on

The Supreme Court on Monday substantially narrowed the district court venues available to patent owners seeking to sue for infringement. In TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), the Supreme...more

Could the Use of Online Volunteers and Moderators Increase Your Company’s Copyright Liability Exposure?

With over one billion websites on the Internet, and 211 million items of online content created every minute, it should come as no surprise that content curation is one of the hottest trends in the Internet industry. We are...more

Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 15-1455-WCB, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4545 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2017) (Bryson, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Restasis® (cyclosporine ophthalmic solution); U.S....more

The Supreme Court, Reversing the Federal Circuit, Holds that “Residence” in the Patent Venue Statute Refers to Only a Domestic...

by BakerHostetler on

In a brief, well-reasoned opinion, a unanimous eight-member Supreme Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is a stand-alone provision governing venue in patent infringement suits, unaffected by the broad definition of...more

Supreme Court Decision Limits Venue Statute in Patent Litigation

by Lathrop & Gage LLP on

On May 22, 2017, in a highly-anticipated decision that could dramatically alter the landscape of patent litigation, the United States Supreme Court held that the “resides” prong of the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C....more

The Supreme Court Narrows Forum Shopping in Patent Infringement Cases Against Domestic Companies in TC Heartland v. Kraft Food...

On May 22, 2017, the US Supreme Court unanimously rejected prior case law allowing patent holders to rely on the general venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c), to file suit where a domestic defendant makes sales. TC Heartland,...more

SCOTUS Messed with Texas: Supreme Court Limits Venue in Patent Cases

by Bryan Cave on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court re-defined the scope of venue in patent cases in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, 581 U.S. ___ (2017). Under the Supreme Court’s ruling, venue in patent cases will now be...more

BREAKING: High Court Limits Where Patent Suits Can Be Filed

by Miller Canfield on

The U.S. Supreme Court just shook up the patent world with its decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC. For nearly 30 years, companies accused of patent infringement could be sued in nearly any place they...more

U.S. Supreme Court Halts Forum Shopping In Patent Infringement Cases

On May 22, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important and long-awaited Opinion in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, a case that centered on where a patent infringement suit can be filed. In a resounding 8-0...more

Supreme Court Holds That U.S. Corporations “Reside” Only in Their State of Incorporation for Patent Venue Purposes, But Questions...

by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP on

Highlights and Impact: On May 22, 2017, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Supreme Court held 8 – 0 that a domestic corporation “resides” only in its state of incorporation for the purpose of...more

EDTX Interprets Federal Circuit Precedent Narrowly, Recommends Applying §315 Estoppel Broadly

by Jones Day on

In Biscotti Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that estoppel under §315(e) apply broadly against Microsoft in an upcoming patent infringement trial scheduled for early June 2017. No....more

Supreme Court Limits Where Patent Cases Can Be Brought—Can You Move to Your Home Court?

by Blank Rome LLP on

The Supreme Court, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, issued an opinion that may limit the number of patent suits brought in courts perceived to be plaintiff-friendly and may give companies the opportunity...more

Sanofi v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Sanofi v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Civ. No. 15-415-RGA, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10653 (D. Del. Jan. 26, 2017) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Multaq® (dronedarone tablets); U.S. Patent No....more

Supreme Court Limits Forum Shopping Options in Patent Litigation

by Saul Ewing LLP on

On Monday, May 22, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, that limits a patentee’s choices of venue in patent infringement litigation. Specifically, the Supreme...more

TC Heartland: Supreme Court Makes Venue Shopping More Difficult for Patent Trolls

In the highly anticipated case on patent-venue shopping, TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, No. 16-341 (S. Ct. May 22, 2017), the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the decision of the Federal Circuit, putting...more

Practical Issues for the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Industry in the Wake of TC Heartland

The US Supreme Court this week held that the broad venue provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) does not apply to patent law—at least, when the defendant is a domestic entity. This decision arises after years of judicial...more

Supreme Court Curbs Venue Shopping in Patent Infringement Cases—Delaware Likely to See Increase in Infringement Actions

Venue Shopping Used for Decades Has Been Curtailed - For the last 25 years, patent owners have taken advantage of a broad interpretation of venue rules to pursue infringement claims in more plaintiff-friendly...more

Did The Supreme Court Just Close The Door On Eastern District Of Texas Patent Plaintiffs?

by Weintraub Tobin on

For over 25 years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States district courts have interpreted the patent venue statute 28 U.S.C. §1400(b) to allow plaintiffs to bring patent infringement cases against...more

4,552 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 183
Cybersecurity

Follow Civil Procedure Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.

Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!