Debtor May Give Consent under TCPA for Collection Calls to Non-Debtor’s Cell Phone by Ballard Spahr LLP on 5/23/2012 Autodialed or prerecorded collection calls to a non-debtor’s cellular telephone number did not violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) because the calls were made with the consent of a debtor with “common...more
Spring Cleaning: FTC Announces Settlement with Oreck Corporation Regarding Vacuum Cleaner and Air Purifier Claims by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright &... on 5/23/2012 The Federal Trade Commission has been busy. On the heels of its $40 million settlement with Skechers, one of the largest of its kind, the Commission yesterday announced that it has settled with Oreck Corporation regarding...more
Ninth Circuit: FDA Regulations Broadly Preempt Food Labeling Claims by Morrison & Foerster LLP on 5/22/2012 Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued a broad FDA preemption ruling that elbows aside federal deceptive-labeling claims in the latest slugfest between Pom Wonderful and Coca-Cola that has been going on for almost five years....more
Groups Sponsoring Electioneering Communications Must Disclose All Donors Pending Appeal of District Court Order by Venable LLP on 5/22/2012 Advocacy groups and trade associations that fund political advertisements may be compelled to make heightened donor disclosures as a result of recent litigation. The expanded disclosure requirements apply to “electioneering...more
Patterson Belknap Secures Major Win For Coca Cola: Ninth Circuit Holds False Advertising Claims Against FDA-Authorized Label Are... by Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on 5/22/2012 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held last week that The Coca Cola Company cannot be sued under the Lanham Act over the name and labeling of a juice product that is authorized by FDA regulations. In doing so,...more
Advertising Law -- May 17, 2012 by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on 5/21/2012 In This Issue: PMA To Be Represented by Manatt Partner Linda Goldstein on FTC Panel; Manatt Partner Jeff Edelstein to Lead CLE Privacy Law Webinar Session; Thanks to the FTC, Defendants Won’t “Get Rich Quick” on...more
Spam, spam, wonderful spam by Jessica John Bowman by McAfee & Taft on 5/18/2012 Originally published in The Journal Record - May 17, 2012. At first glance, email marketing campaigns may appear to be an ideal way to market your business: A business that engages in an email marketing campaign can...more
Spoliation and Social Media by Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP on 5/18/2012 News media have paid significant attention to court orders requiring production of relevant documents from Facebook and social media sites in the course of litigation. As described in my recent post, the Ontario Information...more
US Federal Trade Commission ruling that POM Wonderful Makes False Advertising Claims by JD Supra Law News on 5/17/2012 Full text copy of the 330-age US FTC ruling that POM Wonderful’s claims about the health benefits of drinking its pomegranate juice constitute false advertising. From Courthouse News: “Pom Wonderful makes deceptive...more
POM Wonderful LLC, v. The Coca-Cola Company Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in POM Wonderful LLC, v. The Coca-Cola Company by JD Supra Law News on 5/17/2012 Full text copy of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision dismissing POM Wonderful’s Latham Act false advertising claims against Coca-Cola for the labeling used to describe its Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry...more
Duty to Defend a “Looney” Copyright Claim by Sedgwick LLP on 5/17/2012 Here’s a recent case we thought our readers would be interested in that was posted in our May 2012 Media Law Bulletin. When Looney Ricks Kiss Architects, Inc. (Looney) created an architectural design known as the Island...more
Digital Media Law Alert -- Court Orders Search Engines and Social Sites to De-Index Websites -- May 2012 by Ruskin Moscou Faltischek on 5/17/2012 Hermes International SCA (www.Hermes.com), maker of Birkin handbags and silk scarves, recently won a judgment that includes $100 million in damages against 34 websites that sold fake copies of its luxury goods on websites...more
Shape-up or Ship-out: FTC Sends Tough Message to Marketers of Toning Shoes But Fails to Clarify Murky Standard by Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright &... on 5/17/2012 After much hype on Twitter regarding an action against a “major marketer of consumer goods,” the Federal Trade Commission today announced that it has settled with Skechers USA, Inc. over allegedly deceptive claims that the...more
Alaska Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Unfair Trade Practices Liability for Businesses’ Representations Concerning Their Goods by Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on 5/17/2012 On March 30, 2012, the Alaska Supreme Court significantly expanded the scope of Alaska’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”) in a manner that will increase the risk of liability for businesses that make representations about...more
Shape-Up Your Ad’s Claims: Skechers Agrees to pay $40 Million to Settle Shape-Ups Suit by Cullen and Dykman LLP on 5/17/2012 The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that sneaker manufacturer Skechers has agreed to pay $40 million to purchasers of its Shape-Ups, Resistance Runner, Toners, and Tone-ups shoes. The settlement represents the...more