A Win for Texas: Fifth Circuit Finds EPA’s Disapproval of State Implementation Plan Arbitrary and Capricious by Sedgwick LLP on 5/16/2012 The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) disapproval of Texas’ State Implementation Plan (SIP), finding that the EPA’s action was arbitrary and capricious. In Luminant...more
Supreme Court Oks Transfer Of Gateway Project Near Ambassador Bridge To MDOT by Warner Norcross & Judd - Appellate Practice... on 5/1/2012 The Michigan Supreme Court paved the way for MDOT takeover of the Gateway Project near the Ambassador Bridge with an order which summarily denies the emergency application for relief from the owners of the Bridge. MDOT and...more
Update on Pa. Municipality Act 13 Lawsuit by Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on 4/30/2012 As reported in the March edition of The Shale Play Today, seven Pennsylvania municipalities filed suit in the Commonwealth Court on March 29, 2012, challenging the provision of Act 13 providing that state law preempts the...more
Appellate Court Upholds Use of Future CEQA Baseline in Neighbors for Smart Rail and Rejects Sunnyvale Holding by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis... on 4/26/2012 On April 17, 2012, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District issued its opinion in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority holding that in certain circumstances – projected future...more
Real Estate Legal News - April 4, 2012 • Spring Edition by Dickinson Wright on 4/25/2012 IN THIS ISSUE: - Michigan Legislature Reacts Quickly To Dramatic Nonrecourse Liability Decisions Michigan became the focus of national attention in the world of commercial real estate finance in December, when the...more
First District Holds CEQA Does Not Apply To Napa County Ordinance Clarifying Its Ministerial Lot Line Adjustment Practice, And... by Miller Starr Regalia on 4/24/2012 In a case addressing important issues affecting local agencies and landowners (disclaimer: I represented the County of Napa in the trial court and on appeal), the First District (Division 4) Court of Appeal on April 20, 2012...more
Bans Upheld In Lower Court by Cullen and Dykman LLP on 4/13/2012 Within a week of each other, two lower courts in New York upheld municipal bans on hydraulic fracturing and gas drilling in the Towns of Dryden and Middlefield. These two cases are being closely watched for their precedent...more
Are Florida Right of Way Corridor Preservation Ordinances Unconstitutional? Land Owner Wins First Round in Federal Fight by Rosa Eckstein Schechter on 4/11/2012 In Florida land development, how traffic moves through an area is important - and years in advance of any roadway being constructed, there are land planners who work hard to determine where roads (highways, streets, etc.) are...more
Wondering About the Status of EPA's CCR Rule? So Are 11 Environmental Groups by Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on 4/10/2012 I have had a number of clients ask me recently about the status of EPA’s efforts to regulate coal combustion residuals under RCRA. It turns out that some environmental groups have been asking themselves the same question....more
Supreme Court Declines to Review or Depublish “CEQA In Reverse” Decision by Miller Starr Regalia on 4/9/2012 On March 21, 2012, the California Supreme Court denied a petition for review of the Second District’s published opinion in Ballona Wetlands Land Trust, et al. v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455 (“Ballona...more
Sackett v. EPA: Property Owners May Challenge EPA Orders by Mintz Levin on 4/3/2012 The United States Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrative orders under the Clean Water Act are subject to pre-enforcement judicial review. However, the Supreme Court’s...more
Supreme Court Affirms the Right to Judicial Review of EPA Compliance Orders by Jackson Walker on 3/23/2012 On March 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, a major victory for persons subjected to administrative "compliance orders" of the EPA, which the...more
Supreme Court Expands Right to Challenge Federal Assertions of Clean Water Act Regulatory Jurisdiction by White & Case LLP on 3/23/2012 On March 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that landowners may bring a civil action under the AdministrativeProcedure Act to challenge administrative compliance orders issued under the Clean Water Act. Sackett v. EPA, __...more
US Supreme Court Rules Property Owners May Sue the EPA Over a Wetlands Restoration Order by Lane Powell PC - Environmental Law on 3/23/2012 In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that two Idaho property owners may bring a legal challenge to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) issuance of an administrative order that required the...more
Supreme Court Rules that U.S. EPA Unilateral Compliance Orders Under the Clean Water Act Are Final Actions Judicially Reviewable by K&L Gates LLP on 3/23/2012 In Sackett et vir v. Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Supreme Court held unanimously that a compliance order issued under §309(a)(3) of the Clean Water Act2 is “final action” that is subject to judicial...more