Commercial Law & Contracts, Civil Remedies, Civil Procedure

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Whether SOX’s Whistleblower Provision Protects Employees of Publicly Traded Company’s Contractors

by Noa Baddish, Lloyd B. Chinn, Harris M. Mufson | Proskauer - Whistleblowing & Retaliation on 5/21/2013

On May 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit’s decision holding that SOX’s whistleblower protection does not...more

Discoverability of Documents in Insurance Bad Faith Claims

by Pavlack Law, LLC on 5/17/2013

This week we take a look at the ability to discover documents from an insurance company's claim's file in an insurance bad faith claim through the recent Southern District of Indiana decision in Woodruff v. American Family...more

The High Cost of Paying Physicians for Referrals: Tuomey Healthcare System Faces Penalties of up to $357 Million

by Ari H. Gerstin, Elizabeth F. Hodge | Akerman Senterfitt on 5/17/2013

On May 8, 2013, a jury sitting in the U.S. District Court for South Carolina found that Tuomey Healthcare System, Inc. violated the Stark Law and the False Claims Act (FCA) by illegally paying referring physicians. The jury...more

SCC Rules Roadblock an Abuse of Process Where Legal Remedies Not Exercised

by Laura Gill, E. Bruce Mellett | Bennett Jones LLP on 5/17/2013

Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Behn v. Moulton Contracting Ltd., 2013 SCC 26. The case sets out some important principles that may be relevant for those who engage in operations in areas where...more

Delaware Chancery Court Finds Settlement Agreement Enforceable Despite Lacking Signature

by Jason F. Clouser, William M. Regan | Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on 5/16/2013

The Delaware Court of Chancery recently ruled that a settlement agreement does not have to be fully executed by all parties to be enforceable....more

Arbitral Award of Perpetual License Upheld by Fifth Circuit

by JAMS, The Resolution Experts on 5/15/2013

Once in a while it seems the people who design live-action war-based video games get into real-world non-virtual disputes of their own. When “Timegate” promised to “Southpeak” that it would design a videogame named “Section...more

Court Upholds Zoning Ordinance That Restricts Location Of Medical Marijuana Collectives And Cooperatives

by Jon E. Goetz, Jonathan Hobbs, Jeffrey L. Massey | Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard on 5/15/2013

An owner of a medical marijuana collective challenged a county zoning ordinance that restricts the location of medical marijuana collectives and cooperatives to commercial and manufacturing zones. The court of appeals...more

Estée Lauder v. OneBeacon Insurance Group – Expanding the Scope of Discovery in Bad Faith Cases

by Jennifer Clark, Stacey Farrell, Angelo Savino | Cozen O'Connor on 5/15/2013

On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, granted the insured’s request for the production of certain claims file material and previously sealed discovery in Estée Lauder Inc. v....more

California Court of Appeal Allows Injunction Under Unfair Competition Law To Prevent Horizontal Competitor From Diverting Business...

by Thomas Nevins | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 5/14/2013

For many years, California’s Unfair Competition Law had no traditional standing requirements. But since the passage of Proposition 64 in 2004, standing has been required, and standing continues to be litigated regularly. In...more

Appellate Notes: Week of April 18th

by Edward McCreery III | Pullman & Comley, LLC on 5/14/2013

Welcome to our Supreme and Appellate Court summaries webpage. On this page, I provide abbreviated summaries of decisions from the Connecticut appellate courts which highlight important issues and developments in Connecticut...more

Court Adheres to Specific Definition of “Designated Premises”; Holds Policy Cancellation Does Not Preclude Rescission

by Daniel Bryer | Sedgwick LLP on 5/13/2013

In Seneca Ins. Co. v. Cimran Co., — N.Y.S.2d –, 2013 WL 1405231 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t 2013), the New York appeals court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, declaring that it had no duty to defend and indemnify...more

California Supreme Court Hears Argument on Whether Insurance Code Limits UCL Lawsuits Against Insurers

by Larry Golub, Samuel Sorich | Barger & Wolen on 5/13/2013

On May 8, 2013, the California Supreme Court convened to hear oral argument in Zhang v. Superior Court. The case presents the issue of whether conduct of an insurer, which is related to conduct that would violate California’s...more

Reforming Proposition 65: Governor’s “Update” Is a Promising Start

by Michèle Corash, Robert Falk, Michael Steel | Morrison & Foerster LLP on 5/9/2013

Yesterday, Governor Jerry Brown’s office announced his intention to propose “updates” to Proposition 65 (Health & Safety Code section 25249.5 et seq.) supposedly designed to make the law less susceptible to the widespread...more

A First for FRAND: Federal Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Sets FRAND Royalty Rates for Standard Essential Patents

by Nick Grimmer, Stefan M. Meisner | McDermott Will & Emery on 5/9/2013

Microsoft v. Motorola developed a framework for courts to assess fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms for standard-essential patents. Its roadmap and analysis will probably influence future FRAND cases in...more

Bad Faith Liability Exposure: an Anvil, a Feather or an Occasional Lever?

by Lynda A. Bennett | Lowenstein Sandler LLP on 5/8/2013

Any company faced with a coverage denial inevitably asks the question: Will the insurance company change its position if we sue them for bad faith? The short answer to the question is usually no. In general, insurance...more

Tenth Circuit Holds Affidavit Sufficient To Avoid Summary Judgment On FCRA Emotional Damage Claim

by BuckleySandler LLP on 5/7/2013

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court’s award of summary judgment to a mortgage servicer who provided a negative credit report after the borrower...more

Costs and Attorney Fees Awarded In the Same Action in Idaho

by Christina Ahn | Sedgwick LLP on 5/7/2013

In Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Donnelly, No. — P.3d —-, 2013 WL 1693661 (Idaho Apr. 19, 2013), a majority of the Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a declaratory judgment action decision that an insurer was required to pay...more

Kaiser Opinion May Affect Ability to Stack Policies issued by Single Carrier

by Unnati Gandhi | Farella Braun + Martel LLP on 5/6/2013

Policyholders should continue to assert that limits can be stacked in situations where there is continuing damage, despite the California Court of Appeals’ latest decision in Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. v. Insurance Company...more

Sutherland SALT Shaker: April 2013 Digest

by Mary Alexander, Andrew Appleby, Zachary Atkins, Madison Barnett, Todd Betor, Scott Booth, Christopher Chang, Timothy Gustafson, Saabir Kapoor, Jessica Kerner, Shane Lord, Pilar Mata, more +Suzanne Palms, Kathryn Pittman, David Pope, Maria Todorova, Jack Trachtenberg, Prentiss Willson | Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP on 5/1/2013

In this issue: - California Court of Appeal: No Man May Profit From His Own Wrongdoing in a Court of Justice - The (True) Object of My Affection: A Nontaxable Stock Screening Service - Alternate Universe...more

Your Last Resort: The Unpaid Account

by Joe Virene | Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. on 4/29/2013

A suit on an unpaid account against your customer will likely entitle you to the principal balance plus interest and attorney fees. But a suit on an unpaid account is only as good as your customer’s ability to satisfy the...more

Landmark Florida Supreme Court Decision: Florida’s Economic Loss Rule

by Neha Dagley | Schecter Law on 4/29/2013

In Tiara Condominium Association, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., the Florida Supreme Court held, in a five-to-two decision, that the economic loss rule is limited to products liability cases. Tiara Condominium...more

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Butler Affirms the Long-Standing Dunham Rule and Brings Certainty to Marcellus Shale Natural...

by Christopher Boisvert, Karen Daly, Argia DiMarco, Michael Kichline, William McEnroe | Dechert LLP on 4/26/2013

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Butler v. Charles Powers Estate1 unanimously reversed the ruling of the Superior Court which held that an evidentiary hearing “complete with expert, scientific testimony” is necessary to...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters

Commercial Law & Contracts › Civil Remedies › Civil Procedure