Back to the Future for Real Estate Tax Exemptions and PILOTs/SILOTs? Charities Must Meet HUP Test and Act 55, Pennsylvania High... by Ballard Spahr LLP on 5/8/2012 For charitable organizations in Pennsylvania, obtaining and preserving real estate tax exemptions just got a little more difficult. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the statute intended to clarify the...more
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Supremacy of HUP Test for Determining Real Estate Tax Exemptions by Reed Smith on 5/7/2012 On April 25, 2012, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a potentially explosive decision to 501(c) corporations in Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. Pike County Board of Assessment Appeals; No. 16 MAP 2011. At issue was...more
Tax Exemption Ruling Defines Public Charity v. Business Interests by Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on 5/3/2012 The Kentucky Supreme Court recently ruled that a private, non-profit entity which acquired and marketed property in order to attract new business to Floyd County, did not qualify for an exemption from paying ad valorem real...more
Court Holds Vote To Remove Director Is Not An Exercise Of Free Speech by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis... on 4/19/2012 When directors vote to remove a fellow director, are they exercising their free speech rights? This may seem to be a question that is reserved for courses in legal theory. In California, however, answering the question can...more
Constitutional exceptions in religous employment by Karen Kalzer on 3/26/2012 Religious entities and communities of faith and their insurance carriers can take heart in pursuing defense judgments after the U.S. Supreme Court acted swiftly and unanimously in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and...more
Feds Seeking Public Comments on Religious Objections to Contraceptive Coverage by Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C. on 3/26/2012 Last week HHS, DOL and Treasury issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making seeking public comments on how best to accommodate the objections raised by religious organizations to mandated contraceptive coverage. HHS has...more
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus v. University of Colorado Opinion by Jim Manley on 3/5/2012 The Students for Concealed Carry on Campus filed a complaint against the University of Colorado’s Board of Regents and others alleging that the Board’s Weapons Control Policy violated the Colorado Concealed Carry...more
Unanimous Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor Recognizes Ministerial Exception and Affirms Religious Organizations' Rights Under First... by Gammon & Grange, P.C. on 1/20/2012 On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what is perhaps its most significant religious freedom decision yet in this century, strongly upholding the religious hiring rights of religious organizations. In...more
OBLIGATION IGNORED: WHY INTERNATIONAL LAW REQUIRES THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CIVIL LEGAL AID, WHAT THE UNITED STATES... by Zach Zarnow on 12/25/2011 Exploring international legal obligations to provide civil legal aid, assessing U.S. compliance, and suggesting improved civil legal aid through the use of Legal Empowerment techniques that have been successful in other...more
Johnson v. Whitehead, et. al Equal Protection challenge to Citizenship Law w/ Classifications based on Illegitimacy & Sex by Rachel Zoghlin on 9/22/2011 Today, the UNROW Human Rights Impact Litigation Clinic at American University Washington College of Law filed a petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court challenging, on Equal Protection grounds, a federal...more
Implications of the CLS v. Martinez Supreme Court Decision by Gammon & Grange, P.C. on 7/23/2010 In CLS v. Martinez, the Hastings College of Law sought to impose a nondiscrimination policy that required all student organizations to accept as members and officers any student who attended the law school, even if that...more
Material Support Laws: Combating Terrorism or Terrorizing Peace? by Gammon & Grange, P.C. on 7/16/2010 Alternatively hailed as a bulwark in our nation's war on terrorism and denounced as a descent into a new era of McCarthyism, the Supreme Court's June 21, 2010 decision in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project could have a...more