News & Analysis as of

Government Contracting Civil Remedies General Business

Read Government Contracting Law updates, articles, and legal commentary from leading lawyers and law firms:

Review of the Significant Canadian Federal Government Contracting Cases in 2016

by Dickinson Wright on

All procurements in Canada are, at common law, founded on the principles articulated in the Supreme Court of Canada decision in The Queen (Ontario) v Ron Engineering. Ron Engineering introduced the concepts of “Contract A”...more

Government Contractor Defense Applies to Commercial Product Supplier

by Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

A California appellate court recently affirmed a decision granting summary judgment in favor of an asbestos supplier under the government contractor defense. Kase v. Metaclad Insulation Corp., 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1025 (Cal....more

Court confirms no right of correction for tender proposals after deadline

by Bryan Cave on

On 19 October 2016, the Scottish Court of Session in the Renfrewshire Council case [ 2016 ] CSOH 150 CA 78/16 (Dem-Master Demolition Ltd V Renfrewshire Council as lead authority for Scotland Excel) confirmed that a...more

Supreme Court Requires Many More VOSB Set-Asides

by Smith Anderson on

On June 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) must apply the “Rule of Two” in all contracting decisions in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 1969...more

Top Ten International Anti-Corruption Developments for August 2016

by Morrison & Foerster LLP on

In order to provide an overview for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, we summarize below some of the most important international anti-corruption developments from the past month, with links to primary...more

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Holds That Under Prompt Payment Act, Imposition of Penalty and Attorneys’ Fees Is Discretionary, Not...

by Pepper Hamilton LLP on

Scott Enters., Inc. v. City of Allentown, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1503 (Pa. July 19, 2016) - The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania reversed an order of the Commonwealth Court and held that the prompt payment provisions of the...more

Tenth Circuit Holds that the False Claims Act’s Materiality Requirement Has Teeth in Granting Summary Judgment to Government...

by Ropes & Gray LLP on

On April 22, 2016, in a decision issued before the Supreme Court’s Escobar opinion, the Tenth Circuit addressed the question of what a relator must show to meet the materiality requirement in an implied false...more

Promissory Estoppel and Public Works Bid Disputes in California. Sooo You’re Telling Me There’s a Chance!

Sometimes we hear what we want to hear (or just ignore what the other person is saying). Sometimes this can lead to broken hearts. And, at other times . . . to empty pocketbooks . . ....more

Sons of Cyberlock: Recent Decisions Underscore Challenges in Drafting Enforceable Federal Contracting Teaming Agreements

by Smith Anderson on

Teammates pursuing federal contracts should draft their teaming agreements with care to avoid unintended consequences. The Pitfalls of Non-Specific Teaming Agreements - Among other issues, teammates cannot...more

Federal Civil Penalties Going Up, Way Up

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) published an Interim Final Rule on June 30th nearly doubling the per-claim civil penalties for violations of a number of laws, including the False Claims Act (FCA), the Program...more

Supreme Court Validates “Implied Certification” Liability Under False Claims Act

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision on June 16, 2016, in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7, a case the government contractor and health care communities hoped the Court would use to...more

Subcontractor’s Failure to Strictly Comply With Notice Provision Costs $200,000

by Burr & Forman on

Whether you are an owner, contractor, subcontractor or supplier, you will want to read the rest of this post since it illustrates precisely what all those attorneys have been telling you for years: “Please, please, please...more

Federal False Claims Act (FCA) Actual Damages for Non-Compliant Goods or Services That Cannot Be Remedied

by Clark Hill PLC on

The Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3279 ("FCA"), penalizes contractors for, among other false claims, presenting a claim for payment to the Federal Government for goods or services that were not performed. A...more

California Court of Appeals Says, “We Like Eich(leay)!”

Time is money. And nowhere can than be best observed than on a construction project. Project delays can mean lost profits for owners, liquidated damages for general contractors, and increased material, labor, field...more

Supreme Court affirms government contractors qualified immunity

by Dentons on

In a 6-3 decision issued on January 20, the Supreme Court affirmed in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-857, that federal government contractors are immune from litigation and liability if their work complies with federal...more

How Not to Moot a Case: Supreme Court Rules Case Remains Live After Unaccepted Offer of Settlement

On January 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States decided another case in a line of cases addressing the issue of class action mootness. Specifically, the justices ruled that an unaccepted settlement offer or offer...more

ASBCA continues to undermine a contractor's ability to successfully establish a statute of limitations defense to government cost...

by Dentons on

Recently, in Alion Science & Tech. Corp., ASBCA No. 58992 (Nov. 10, 2015), the ASBCA issued yet another decision undermining a contractor's ability to successfully raise a Contract Disputes Act (CDA) statute of limitations...more

Public disclosure bar prohibits "bounty-hunting" relators from filing duplicative FCA claims

by DLA Piper on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an opinion that underscores the importance of the "public disclosure bar" in False Claims Act (FCA) litigation. The court affirmed a lower court’s...more

Pennsylvania Court Refuses to Enforce “No Damages for Delay” Clause

by Saul Ewing LLP on

A Pennsylvania appellate court recently refused to enforce a “no damages for delay” clause and upheld an award of delay damages against a school district where the district actively interfered with a general contractor’s...more

Court Throws Wet Blanket On Prime Contractor's Attorneys' Fees Request In Prompt Payment Case

In James L. Harris Painting & Decorating, Inc. v. West Bay Builders, Inc., et al. (No. C072169, filed 8/27/15), the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District upheld the trial court's discretion to not award...more

Contractor’s Repeated Material Breach Excuses Subcontractor From Further Performance

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York in U.W. Marx, Inc. v. Koko Contracting, Inc. affirmed judgment in favor of a subcontractor, holding that the general contractor’s failure to make three successive...more

Contractor Barred from Using the “Total Cost” or “Modified Total Cost” Approach to Establish Delay Claim

In a recent ruling, Hill York Service Corporation v. Critchfield Mechanical, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that a contractor may not establish damages for delay under either the...more

Blog: What States Should Know About The Contractual Consequences Of Bribery

by Cooley LLP on

Bribery. States often have to decide to exit or continue with contracts procured by bribes paid to public officials. Bribery gives rise to various types of claim. We have previously covered claims to recover the value of...more

Arizona State Legislature Expands Prompt Payment to Design Professionals on Public Works Projects

by Snell & Wilmer on

Arizona law has long protected the rights of contractors, subcontractors and suppliers to prompt payment. However, all such protections have not extended to design professionals. For example, in 2013, the Arizona Court of...more

Arizona Court of Appeals Interprets Stricter Requirements for Payment Bond Claimants

by Snell & Wilmer on

Arizona has long protected the rights of subcontractors and material suppliers to seek recovery from the payment bond surety on public bonded projects. Arizona’s Little Miller Act, A.R.S. § 34-223, provides that claimants...more

51 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 3
Cybersecurity

Follow Government Contracting Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.

Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!