IP|Trend: Inter Partes Review: Is It Still Right For You?
IS THE A IN ANDA BEGINNING TO MEAN ANTITRUST?
What Does the Supreme Court Ruling in Alice v. CLS Mean to a Software Entrepreneur?
Bill Beutler on Editing Wikipedia
Inter Partes Review Appeals: What You Need to Know
The AIA Has Moved the Cheese
Emerging Markets: Opportunity, Risk, and What it Means for Brand Protection
How is Graphene Currently Used and What is the Hope for the Future?
Derivation Proceedings: What You Need to Know
What is Graphene? Fenwick Patent Attorney Has the Answer
Examining Trends in Worldwide Design IP Filings
Two Tips for Inventors Filing Patent Applications
Track One and the Patent Prosecution Highway
The Intersection Between Intellectual Property Law and Employment Law
Lessons from Nautilus v. Biosig at the Supreme Court
Examining the Impact of the Supreme Court's Limelight v. Akamai Decision
FCPA Compliance and Ethics Report-Episode 72-interview with Michael Rasmussen
The Evolution of Trade Secret Damages
The Art of Communicating to a Jury
The Evolution of Patent Damages
The second step in bringing your medical device to market is to understand whether you can protect your invention.
This article is part two of a series that presents the three big issues in intellectual property: Do...more
In March, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) implemented new procedures to address whether inventions that relate in whole or in part to laws of nature and naturally occurring products are patent-eligibility in...more
Updated subject matter eligibility guidance from the USPTO -
On the same day that the Supreme Court’s opinion was handed down in Assoc. for Mol. Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013), the U.S. Patent...more
On January 31, 2014, Phigenix, Inc. (“Phigenix”) filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Georgia alleging that the sale and use of the drug Kadcyla by Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,080,534B2,...more
In SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Labs., S.A., No. 2013-1186 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 24, 2014), the Federal Circuit held that a patent claiming the use of a computer to implement routine mental information-comparison and...more
On January 27, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. v. Cobalt Pharmaceuticals Co., 2014 FCA 17 (Novartis), upheld the Federal Court’s denial of an application for a prohibition order under...more
In the decision of Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd  HCA 50 (order), the High Court of Australia, Australia's supreme court, confirmed that methods of medical treatment are a "manner of manufacture" and...more
Last month, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (“IDNR”) published its first draft of the regulations (62 Ill. Adm. Code 245) (the “HFRA Draft Regulations”) under the Illinois Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Act (225...more
Last week, the National Institutes of Health denied a petition from a coalition of "public interest" groups who petitioned the agency to exercise so-called "march-in rights" under provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act against...more
Actress Angelina Jolie recently spent around $3200 to take one of Myriad Genetics’ many breast cancer screening tests. When the test revealed that a mutation existed somewhere in a sequence of 81,000 nucleotides found on her...more
This article analyzes the US Supreme Court's recent antitrust decision in FTC v. Actavis, which held that that courts should apply the rule of reason in analyzing reverse-payment settlements.
In 2007, Dey L.P., Dey Inc., and their parent company Mylan, Inc. (collectively, "Dey") sued Sunovion Pharmaceutical, Inc. ("Sunovion"; formerly known as Sepracor, Inc.) for infringement of five of Dey's patents....more
Full text copy of the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics that human genes may not be patented because they occur naturally in nature.
From Greg Stohr writing for...more
On March 28, the Federal Circuit in Rubin v. General Hospital Corp. affirmed judgment by the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing the suit brought by Drs. Berish Rubin and Sylvia Anderson against The...more
Last week, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) was joined by Senators David Vitter (R-LA), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) in introducing S. 204, the "Fair and Immediate Release of Generic Drugs...more
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) on European Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) for Further Medical Uses: With a remarkable ruling from July 2012 (Neurim Pharmaceuticals, C-130/11), the European Court of Justice...more
Seven organizations of health care professionals argue in an amici brief filed in Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("Myriad") that Myriad's isolated DNA and cDNA claims, as well as claim...more
In this issue:
- New Procedures for Challenging Patent Validity
- Aggressive Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Likely to Continue in 2012
- Life Sciences: The Rodney Dangerfield of Venture Capital
Tuesday the Supreme Court unanimously decided Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Labs, a decision of considerable significance to the diagnostics industry.
The Court reversed the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals,...more
In a decision he has waited six years to write (having dissented from the Court's decision not to decide similar issues in Laboratory Corp. v. Metabolite Labs., Inc. in 2006), Justice Breyer (and a unanimous Court) overturned...more
On March 20, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in the case of Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. slip. op., Case No. 10-1150 (March 20, 2012). This decision resolves a...more
In This Issue:
- 58 U.S. Supreme Court Cases to Watch
- 59 Securities Litigation: Recent Supreme Court Decisions and Future Trends
- 66 Continued Step-up in Government Investigations and White Collar Crime...more
The District of Delaware recently denied a motion to dismiss an antitrust counterclaim in a patent infringement action in the wake of defendant Mylan, Inc. ("Mylan") having filed an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA")...more
On December 17, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit confirmed that claims to clinical and diagnostic methods can constitute patent-eligible subject matter in its Prometheus II,1 decision. This was one of...more
What constitutes patentable subject matter? The
tension between the broad language of 35 U.S.C. Section 101 and the limitations of its scope by the courts is playing out in the context of patent eligibility of process...more
Find an Intellectual Property Author »
Back to Top