Labor & Employment Law, Conflict of Laws, Commercial Law & Contracts

Buyer Beware of Successor Liability For FLSA Claims

by Donna Ray Berkelhammer | Sands Anderson PC on 4/23/2013

Businesses often acquire other businesses through an asset purchase, rather than a stock purchase, so that the buyer does not inherit the liabilities of the seller. Not all business owners realize that federal labor law...more

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Plan Terms Trump Equitable Defenses

by Russell Hirschhorn, Myron Rumeld | Proskauer - ERISA Practice Center on 4/17/2013

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen in which the Court unanimously ruled that a clearly drafted reimbursement clause will trump all equitable defenses....more

Creditors Can Reach Benefits under "Top Hat" Plan, United States District Court of Maryland Rules

by Katherine Lange | Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC on 4/17/2013

Executive Summary: ERISA “top hat” plan’s anti-alienation provision does not trump state garnishment laws. A familiar feature of ERISA is its protection of a participant’s retirement savings from creditors; ERISA...more

Buyer Beware: Seventh Circuit Upholds Application of the Federal Common Law Standard of Successor Liability in an Asset Sale

by Bill Berger, Adam Duerr, Gino Maurelli, Matthew Nyberg | Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on 4/15/2013

One of the benefits to structuring an acquisition as an asset deal is that the buyer has the ability to choose the liabilities that it will assume and the liabilities that will remain with the seller, including contingent...more

7th Circuit Holds Successor Liable for FLSA Claims, Despite Buyer’s Disclaimer

by Leo Crowley, Thomas N. Makris, Alexander Parachini, Paula Weber | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on 4/12/2013

In Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, LLC, the 7th Circuit in an opinion written by Judge Posner held that, absent a good reason to withhold liability, a purchaser of assets was subject to successor liability for Fair...more

Successor Liability Under The FLSA: Seventh Circuit Holds Purchaser Of Assets From Receiver Of Company Which Had Violated FLSA...

by M. Reid Estes, Jr., Daniel Gosch | Dickinson Wright on 4/11/2013

In a case which is sure to complicate the sale of companies (or discrete divisions thereof) and have widespread influence in other Circuits, the Seventh Circuit recently held that a company which acquired the assets (not...more

Does The Alabama Trade Secrets Act Limit Remedies For Theft Of Information?

by Gillian Watson Egan | Burr & Forman on 4/10/2013

Alabama enacted the Alabama Trade Secrets Act (the “ATSA”) in 1987. However, since that time, there have been relatively few reported court decisions analyzing the impact of the ATSA on common law claims. A federal district...more

Asset Acquisition Comes With Unexpected FLSA Pain

by John Birmingham Jr. | Foley & Lardner LLP on 4/10/2013

Some bargains are not as they seem. An asset-acquiring Company discovered this the hard way in Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions. In the case, at an auction, Thomas & Betts purchased the assets of a company in...more

Ninth Circuit Holds Private Company Rules Preempt California Law

by Keith Paul Bishop | Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis... on 4/10/2013

California Labor Code Section 450(a) forbids employers from coercing the patronage of their employees: It provides...more

Investments Slovakia Belgium Slovak Law Nederlandstalige advocaat slowakije

by Kocks & Partners Rechtsanwälte Belgien on 3/21/2013

The Embassy of the Slovak Republic in Belgium in cooperation with the Slovak Investment and Trade Development Agency SARIO and EsPartners would like to invite you to SEMINAR „INVEST IN SLOVAKIA“ Get to Know Slovakia as...more

California Appellate Court Orders Arbitration and Rules that Claims May Not Proceed On Behalf of a Class Plaintiff in Macy's OT...

by Dawn Kennedy, Greg Mersol | BakerHostetler on 1/31/2013

A recent decision from a California court of appeals reflects a growing, if at times reluctant, acceptance by California courts of employment arbitration. In Outland v. Macy’s Department Stores, Inc., Case No. A133589 (Ct....more

Courts Continue to Wrestle With Arbitration Issues

by Greg Mersol | BakerHostetler on 12/17/2012

Decades ago, Congress passed the Federal Arbitration Act to combat the hostility courts showed towards arbitration agreements. Since that time, the Supreme Court has repeatedly pronounced the public policy in favor of the...more

SCOTUS Reigns Supreme On Issue Of Arbitration Of Non-Compete Agreements

by Peter C. Vilmos | Burr & Forman on 12/13/2012

Some states specifically allow non-compete agreements. Of those states, some have legislation that provides guidelines to parties to a non-compete agreement regarding enforceability. Other states take the approach that...more

Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Are Now Operating in Arizona

by Neil Alexander, Kristy Peters | Littler on 12/13/2012

On December 3, 2012, an Arizona Superior Court judge issued an order holding that the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) does not preempt the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act. Three days later, the first medical marijuana...more

Supreme Court: Arbitration Agreements May Trump Conflicting State Law

by Michael C. Jacobson | XpertHR - Partnered with LexisNexis on 12/3/2012

Employers that utilize arbitration agreements just received a major vote of confidence from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). In Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. Eddie Lee Howard, et al., +2012 U.S. LEXIS...more

Appellate Panel Tries to Draft a Roadmap for the California Supreme Court to Save California's Prohibition of Class Action Waivers...

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 12/1/2012

The battle for how the landmark arbitration decision Concepcion v. AT&T Mobility (“Concepcion”) should be construed in California continues with Monday’s issuance of Franco v. Arekelian Enterprises, Inc. (“Franco II”)....more

Non-Competes Pay a Rare Visit to the U.S. Supreme Court

by Fisher & Phillips LLP on 11/30/2012

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in a non-compete case -- a type of dispute that rarely finds its way to the high court. See Nitro-Lift Technologies v. Lee, 568 U.S. --- (2012)....more

Non-Compete Agreements with Arbitration Clauses Get Boost From US Supreme Court

by Sands Anderson PC on 11/28/2012

Employers and employees often enter into non-compete agreements that limit an employee’s ability to compete with an employer during, or after, the employee’s employment. These agreements are often the subject of intense...more

U.S. Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Clause in Non-Compete Agreement

by Michael A. Warner Jr. | Franczek Radelet P.C. on 11/28/2012

In the latest of a long line of decisions favoring arbitration, the United States Supreme Court has overturned a decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court invalidating a non-compete agreement that contained a binding arbitration...more

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That State Courts Must Not Assume The Arbitrator’s Role By Declaring Non-Compete Agreements Null And Void

by Keith Paul Bishop | Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis... on 11/27/2012

A short per curiam opinion issued yesterday by the United States Supreme Court concerning an employment dispute in Oklahoma is likely to result in consternation in California....more

High Court Vacates State Supreme Court’s Arbitration Ruling in Noncompete Case

by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on 11/26/2012

This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, ruled that the Oklahoma Supreme Court failed to adhere to a correct interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The Court vacated a decision made by the...more

Permanent Injunctions and The Erie Problem

by Kenneth Vanko | Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC on 10/26/2012

God help us all! I am discussing the Erie v. Tompkins case from 1938. This was like the fourth most annoying case from law school, and I thought I left it once and for all in Champaign, Illinois in 1997....more

Severance Payments Held to be Exempt From FICA Taxes; Creates Split in the Circuits

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on 10/25/2012

In a recent case, United States v. Quality Stores, the Sixth Circuit ruled that certain severance payments paid to involuntarily terminated employees pursuant to an employer’s reduction in workforce are not “wages” for FICA...more

D.R. Horton Decision on Class Action Waivers in Mandatory Arbitration Agreements Draws Decidedly Negative Reaction from Federal...

by Franczek Radelet P.C. on 9/24/2012

In January, we reported on the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) controversial decision in D.R. Horton, Inc. and the broad implications that it had for both union and non-unionized workforces. The NLRB’s decision in...more

California Court Criticizes Prior Case Law Invalidating Class Action Waivers, Then Punts To State Supreme Court

by Proskauer - California Employment Law on 8/27/2012

Truly Nolen of America v. Superior Court, 2012 WL 3222211 (Aug. 13, 2012) California law involving classwide wage-and-hour arbitration continues to evolve in the aftermath of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters

Labor & Employment Law › Conflict of Laws › Commercial Law & Contracts