Science, Computers & Technology Intellectual Property

Read Science, Computers & Technology updates, news, alerts, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2016)

Core Wireless Licensing brought an action against LG Electronics in the Eastern District of Texas. Core contended that LG infringed claim 21 of its U.S. Patent No. 7,804,850. LG moved for summary judgment on the grounds...more

New USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance Following CellzDirect and Sequenom

On July 14, 2016, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued new subject matter eligibility guidance for life science claims following a ruling by the Federal Circuit in Rapid Litigation Management v. CellzDirect, No....more

Federal Circuit Demonstrates Willingness to Rein in PTAB’s Onerous Idle Free Rules Regarding Claim Amendments

Patentees have been generally frustrated with the Board’s unwillingness to grant motions to amend. The Board’s Idle Free case, and its progeny, have added a number of requirements to a motion to amend that are above and...more

BREAKING NEWS: FDA Approves Sandoz’s Erelzi, biosimilar to Enbrel (etanercept)

The FDA today approved Sandoz’s application for a biosimilar version of Amgen’s Enbrel product (etanercept). Sandoz’s biosimilar is called Erelzi. It is the first biosimilar etanercept approved by FDA, and the third...more

Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. J. Crew Group, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2016)

Eastern District of Texas and PTAB Issue Conflicting Decisions on Same Patent - IV sued J. Crew for patent infringement of three patents: U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,715, 6,782,370, and 5,969,324. J. Crew filed a Motion to...more

Specific, Discrete Implementation of Abstract Idea Is Patent Eligible

Once again addressing patent eligibility of software patent claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit this time reversed a finding of ineligible subject matter based on the Alice step two inventive concept...more

EON v. Apple: District Court Permits Plaintiff to Present Technology Tutorial Through Expert Consultant Not Previously Designated

Apple filed an objection to EON's plan to present a technology tutorial through its expert consultant. Apple asserted that the consultant was not disclosed as an expert on whom EON intended to rely upon during claim...more

Litigation Update: Motions in Janssen v. Celltrion for Entry of Final Judgment and Case Scheduling

As we posted previously, the District Court in Janssen v. Celltrion has ruled that the ‘471 patent is invalid for obviousness-type double patenting on the two grounds raised in the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on...more

Data Transmission Patent Not Invalid Under Alice

Since the decision of Alice v. CLS Bank, courts have routinely invalidated patents for being directed to nothing more than abstract ideas with no inventive concept. However, there is light at the end of the tunnel for patent...more

The Ripple Effect of the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Amgen v. Apotex on Biosimilar Litigation

In July, the Federal Circuit decided Amgen v. Apotex, No. 2016-1308 (Fed, Cir. July 5, 2016), its second decision interpreting the U.S. biosimilar statute, the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation of Act of 2009...more

Smack Talk: Whole Foods’ Quest to be “World’s Healthiest”

Whole Foods recently garnered attention when its trademark application for World’s Healthiest Grocery Store was rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The trademark examiner focused on the “World’s Healthiest”...more

When Applying Alice, Evaluate the Invention as a Whole

Addressing for the first time eligibility issues under 35 USC § 101 for a method of preserving organ cells, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s ruling that the claims were directed to...more

A Novel Outcome at the International Trade Commission: Patent Claims Invalidated Under Alice in the 100-Day Pilot Program

On August 22, 2016, Administrative Law Judge David Shaw of the International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”) issued his final initial determination (“the ID”) in Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Components...more

U.S. Appeals Court Finds a Software Patent Valid Even Under the Supreme Court’s “Alice” Test

A recent Federal Circuit decision in Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, gives patent owners another illustration of patent subject matter eligibility under section 101....more

Genzyme Petitions Federal Circuit for Rehearing in Genzyme Therapeutic Products, Inc. v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Many of the complaints from patent holders over the PTO's inter partes review process under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (codified in pertinent part at 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319) stem from how the Office has implemented...more

Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Limits Common Sense in Obviousness Determinations in Patent Claims

On August 10, 2016, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals tightened the usage of common sense and in doing so clarified the criteria for applying it in an obviousness determination. Arendi S.A.R.L., Appellant v. Apple Inc.,...more

En Banc Court Ties On-Sale Bar to Commercial Sale in Accordance with Uniform Commercial Code

In a unanimous en banc decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit established the circumstances under which a product manufactured according to product-by-process claims is invalid under the “on-sale bar” of 35...more

The Alice v. CLS Bank Scorecard, Two Years Later

It has now been a two years since the Supreme Court rendered its now infamous Alice v. CLS Bank decision.  It is safe to say that the Alice decision has had a profound impact on software patent enforcement, both at the...more

Daubert motion is granted in

Defendant moved to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s damages expert Charles Perry. The expert relied on a license relating to the patent-in-suit which had been made in the context of settling a litigation dispute. He...more

In Case You Missed It: Launch Links - August, 2016 #3

Some interesting links we found across the web this week: In Copyright Law, Computers and Robots Don’t Count - We mentioned last week the changing landscape of software patents, but don’t lose sight of developments...more

Asserted Claims Are Not Anticipated But Are Obvious

The disputed technology relates to ethinyl estradiol and etonogestral vaginal ring used for contraception. The bench trial took place from January 19 through 22, 2016. The asserted claims are not invalid due to anticipation....more

Iloperidone trial results in finding of infringement of valid patents

In this ANDA trial, the disputed technology relates to the treating a patient suffering from schizophrenia with iloperidone. The court finds that all asserted claims in the patents-in-suit are valid. The ‘610 patent is not...more

Summary judgment is denied due to factual disputes

Stark, C. J. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment of infringement is denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement is denied. Oral argument took place on August 17, 2016....more

Paying for software development? Make sure you own it!

In a digital society dominated by the saying, “there’s an app for that,” copyright protection is essential. Paying to have a work created does not automatically vest ownership of the copyright in the paying party. When making...more

Court Report - August 2016 #2

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Tris Pharma Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al. 1:16-cv-00603l; filed July 12, 2016 in the District Court of...more

7,658 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 307

Follow Science, Computers & Technology Updates on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×