Science, Computers & Technology Intellectual Property Civil Procedure

Read Science, Computers & Technology updates, news, alerts, and legal analysis from leading lawyers and law firms:
News & Analysis as of

Implementation of Teva’s Hybrid Review Claim Construction - CSR PLC v. Azure Networks, LLC

Addressing the issue of de novo versus differential claim construction review post-Teva, the Supreme Court of the United States remanded back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit a case where de novo review...more

ITC Section 337 Update - May 2015 #2

Federal Circuit Reverses Commission Determination Of Domestic Industry Economic Prong – On May 11, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued an Opinion in Lelo Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 2013-1582 (Fed. Cir. 2015), reversing the...more

Cannot Deny Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fees Motion After Finding Case Exceptional Without Basis - Oplus Techs., Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc.

Addressing the issue of attorneys’ fees, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a district court’s denial of fees, finding that it “cannot find a basis to support the court’s refusal to award...more

After B&B Hardware, What is the Full Scope of Estoppel Arising From a PTAB Decision in District Court Litigation?

The America Invents Act (AIA) created several adjudicative proceedings within the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, including inter partes review, post-grant review, and covered...more

Tracking #AliceStorm: Spring Showers Continue to Rain Patent Destruction

It's been six weeks since my last AliceStorm update, and we've had plenty of action: twelve §101 decisions, and fourteen patents invalidated in just that period. That said, the success rate of motions on the pleadings is...more

Applicability of the Entire Market Value Rule in Hatch-Waxman Cases - AstraZeneca AB, et al. v. Apotex Corp., et al.

Addressing damages issues in the Hatch-Waxman context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit provided important guidance regarding the application of the entire market value rule to pharmaceutical sales, and the...more

IP Newsflash - May 2015 #5

SUPREME COURT CASES - Invalidity is not a Defense to Infringement but a Defense to Liability - This week, on May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court held in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. that a defendant’s...more

Court Report - May 2015 #4

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Tris Pharma Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories FL Inc. et al. 1:15-cv-00393; filed May 15, 2015 in the District Court of...more

Supreme Court Rules that Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity is Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of a patent is not a defense to an induced infringement claim. The Court also affirmed its previous holdings that an induced infringement...more

Patent Infringement in the Digital Age: How a Dispute About Tooth Aligners Led to a Fight About the ITC’s Jurisdiction over...

The International Trade Commission (“ITC”) is an “independent nonpartisan agency that investigates and reports to the President and Congress on matters concerning import trade, tariffs and trade agreements.” Shewmaker v....more

Need to Establish Criticality of Claimed Range to Avoid Anticipation by Broader, Overlapping Range - Ineos USA LLC v. Berry...

Addressing anticipation under pre-AIA § 102 in the context of a claimed numerical range and prior art disclosing a broader, overlapping range, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s summary...more

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.: A Good-Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity is Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on May 26, 2015, that a defendant accused of inducing the infringement of a patent cannot rely on a good-faith belief in the patent’s invalidity as a defense to liability. This ruling enhances the...more

When You Don’t Know What You Know: The Role of Unappreciated Inherency in the Obviousness Analysis

The patent statute makes it clear that subject matter that would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of a patent application is not patentable.[1] The considerations relevant...more

Belief That a Patent Is Invalid Is Not a Defense to Inducement Liability

The Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. on Tuesday holding that a patent infringement defendant’s good faith belief that the patent in suit is invalid is not a defense...more

Motion To Join Additional Party Comes Too Late

Thynge, C.M. J. Magistrate recommends that plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint to add infringement claims against non-party Microsoft be denied. Plaintiff sought to join Microsoft in November, 2014, which it...more

Post-Trial JMOL And New Trial Motions Are Granted In Part

Robinson, J. Defendant’s JMOL and new trial motions regarding the ‘081 and ‘686 patents is denied. Its JMOL and new trial motion relating to the second trial is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s JMOL motion as...more

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.: Defendant May Be Liable For Indirect Infringement Despite Good Faith Belief That Patent Is...

Practice Points: - Supreme Court holds that a good faith belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to active inducement of infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). The same result presumably holds for contributory...more

Good Faith Belief in Invalidity No Defense to Active Inducement

The U.S. Supreme Court (Justice Kennedy writing for the majority) has now eliminated a defense that has been available to parties accused of actively inducing patent infringement under 35 USC § 271(b). The Court held that a...more

Koepsell and Noonan on Gene Patenting

In 2009, the first edition of Dr. David Koepsell's book "Who Owns You: The Corporate Gold Rush to Patent Your Genes" was published. With the second edition of his text about to be published, Dr. Koepsell allowed Patent Docs...more

“And One”: Stricken Infringement Contentions Warrant Dismissal And Judgment of Non-Infringement

Order Entering Judgment, Blue Spike LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc., 14-cv-01647 (Judge Yvonne Gonzales-Rogers) - Bay Area fans of the red-hot Golden State Warriors are familiar with basketball’s “and one” rule: if a player...more

Locke Lord QuickStudy: Belief As To A Patent’s Validity Is Not A Defense To Induced Infringement

Following last year’s decision in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. et al., 572 U.S. ____ (2014) (holding that a finding of induced infringement requires that all infringing acts be performed by a single...more

Good Faith Belief in Invalidity of Patent Will Not Immunize Induced Infringer

Bringing a lawsuit for a distinct variety of patent infringement has been made a little easier, which is good news for patent owners but probably bad news for victims of patent trolls. This outcome follows from a recent...more

Supreme Court Holds Good Faith Belief of Invalidity Not a Defense to Induced Infringement Claim

The U.S. Supreme Court held yesterday in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc. (No. 13-896) that a defendant’s belief regarding patent invalidity is not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Justice Kennedy authored the...more

Supreme Court Limits Defenses to Induced Infringement

In an important decision in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., the U. S. Supreme Court held yesterday that a good-faith belief in the invalidity of a patent cannot negate the intent required for induced infringement. The...more

Motion To Disqualify Law Firm Is Granted

Plaintiff accuses defendant’s NAND flash products of infringing eight patents. Two of the attorneys in that firm were previously employed by Weil Gotshal & Manges where the represented defendant in seven patent cases and a...more

2,172 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 87

Follow Science, Computers & Technology Updates on:

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×