News & Analysis as of

Health Civil Procedure Professional Malpractice

Read need-to-know updates, commentary, and analysis on Health issues written by leading professionals.

Protecting Vulnerable Adults While Protecting Their Physicians – A Proposed Statutory Amendment

by Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Supreme Court’s recent decision in Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson AZ, LLC, subjects health care providers to liability for ordinary negligence under the Adult Protective Services Act. This decision therefore...more

Have You Properly Obtained Informed Consent?

by Burr & Forman on

In June, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a controversial opinion holding that a physician had to have face-to-face interaction with the patient to effectively obtain informed consent. This has raised heightened...more

The Supreme Court of Ohio Dismisses as Improvidently Accepted Case on Whether a Physician-Employee Needs to Be Named in Medical...

In an interesting turn of events, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed Rush v. Univ. of Cincinnati Physicians, Inc. as improvidently accepted. The issue in the case was whether a physician-employee needs to be joined as a...more

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Only Physicians – Not Their Staff – Can Obtain Informed Consent

by Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

A recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision will have a major impact on how physicians across the Commonwealth obtain informed consent from their patients. In Shinal v. Toms, 2017 WL 2655387 (Pa. June 20, 2017), the 4-3...more

The Doctor Is In – or Better Be to Satisfy PA’s New Informed Consent Requirements

With the increased presence of qualified staff members in a physician’s office and the constant time-pressure on physicians, many patients rely heavily on individuals other than the physician to answer questions about...more

Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court Revises Test for APSA Claim - The Supreme Court has revised the test for determining if an actionable violation of the Adult Protective Services Act has occurred. A.R.S. § 46-451. The court...more

Robinson v. Azer

Plaintiff's Closing Argument in Jury Trial for Orthopedic Surgery Malpractice

An 82-year-old patient who underwent a total knee replacement surgery ended up with a black leg that had to be amputated above the knee. This is plaintiffs' closing argument in a two-week jury trial alleging medical...more

Fla. justices reject keystones of partisans’ plan to undercut patients’ rights

As congressional Republicans pursue their counter factual campaign this week to strip patients of their rights to pursue legal redress for harms they suffer while seeking medical services, the Florida Supreme Court has sent a...more

Medical Negligence - The new legal test in Singapore to determine the standard of a doctor's duty in advising his patient - A...

by Dentons on

The Singapore Court of Appeal has in its recent judgment in the case of Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien and another [2017] SGCA 38 (Hii Chii Kok v London Lucien Ooi) delivered on 12 May 2017, decided that the Bolam...more

Anything Goes: Indiana Supreme Court Holds Malpractice Claimants Not Limited to Theories Presented to Medical Review Panel

by Reminger Co., LPA on

Indiana’s Medical Malpractice Act requires that before claimants may bring a malpractice action against qualified healthcare providers in court, their claims must be reviewed by a medical review panel (“panel”). The panel...more

Florida Supreme Court Rulings Affecting Health Care Providers

by Wilson Elser on

It is well established that Florida physicians are required to report any adverse incident that occurs in their office to the Department of Health. Discovery of these reports is a patient’s constitutional right under Article...more

Fifth DCA Reaffirms Protections Against Surprise Tactics at Trial

by Rumberger Kirk & Caldwell on

This past January, Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal found that a trial court had committed reversible error by allowing a party to argue and present previously undisclosed expert testimony and evidence to the jury at...more

An Arbitration Agreement That Attempts to Skew a Statutory Arbitration Scheme Is Void as Against Public Policy

Federal public policy favors arbitration and the broad interpretation and enforcement of arbitration agreements. So how can an arbitration agreement be held by a court to be void as against public policy? One answer from a...more

A Heartfelt Class Action

by Benesch on

Few class actions tug at the heart, but Blevins v. Aksut does. Elizabeth Blevins and 180 others brought a class action in Alabama state court against Seydi V. Aksut, M.D., alleging that “after an examination, Doctor...more

Florida Supreme Court Rules That Hospital "Adverse Medical Incidents" Reported to a PSO Are Not Privileged From Discovery: Impact...

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida (Hospital) was sued in a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff sought to discover records relating to "adverse medical incidents" that occurred at the Hospital and involved any...more

Recent Arizona appellate decisions of note to providers

by Snell & Wilmer on

With change, breaking news, and uncertainty dominating the legal concerns of health care providers on a federal level, it remains important to review and refresh on state-level concerns and legal rules. This is especially...more

Client Alert: Florida Supreme Court Broadens Patient Access to Adverse Incident Reports

A recent decision by the Florida Supreme Court has significant implications regarding certain adverse incident reports previously viewed as outside the scope of permitted discovery. Florida health care providers currently...more

Amendment 7 Prevails Over Patient Safety Work Product Protections

by Carlton Fields on

On January 31, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the “Patient Safety Work Product” privilege cannot shield Florida health care providers from Amendment 7 requests. The court’s decision in Charles v. Southern Baptist...more

Washington Supreme Court Expands Physicians’ Duty to Third Parties

by Cozen O'Connor on

Most states have laws either requiring or permitting mental health professionals to disclose information about patients who may become violent. These voluntary or mandatory reporting laws require a balancing of the...more

Medical Causation Experts Pass Daubert Test, But Cannot Opine on Plaintiff’s Lack of Capacity to Sign Release

by Reed Smith on

We typically write about product liability cases, not medical malpractice actions. But the two are not mutually exclusive, and similar issues arise in those cases. Medical causation is an issue we often see in both. Capacity...more

Medical Litigation Newsletter - December 2016

by Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on

Defending Audits Before They Happen: A Practical Guide to Documenting to Sustain A Challenge to E/M Codes - Although many believe malpractice suits to be the primary risk-management issue facing healthcare providers, an...more

Ohio Supreme Court Decision Permits Immediate Appeals from Discovery Orders Requiring Disclosure of Privileged Materials

by Reminger Co., LPA on

In Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Case No. 2015-1127 the Ohio Supreme Court recently issued a decision that will make it easier to file immediate (aka interlocutory) appeals from trial court decisions requiring...more

La. Decision Clears Path for Circumventing Med Mal Cap

by Faegre Baker Daniels on

Brandi’s parents allege that they rushed her to the Opelousas General Hospital ER and asked Dr. Z to administer stroke medication, but Dr. Z declined, administering anti-seizure medication instead. Frustrated, they...more

Ohio Supreme Court Rules Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Must Be Filed Within Four Years of Claimed Injury

by Reminger Co., LPA on

Reminger Co., L.P.A. is pleased to announce that it successfully persuaded the Ohio Supreme Court to reverse the Eighth District Court of Appeals, in the case of Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-7432. ...more

Health Alert (Australia) October 24, 2016

by DLA Piper on

In This Issue: - Judgments; Legislation; and Reports. - Excerpts from Judgments: Victoria 19 October 2016 - Damir Redzepovic v Western Health [2016] VSCA 251 The applicant sought leave to appeal from...more

118 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 5
Cybersecurity

Follow Health Updates on:

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.