50 For 50: Five Decades Of The Most Important Discrimination Law Developments - Number 26: Individuals Cannot Be Liable For Title VII Violations


There are all sorts of reasons why an employee would want to avoid discrimination or harassment of co-workers or direct reports, but the one which resonates the most is the potential that the employee can be found individually liable for his or her actions.  But as Title VII caselaw mounted, it became clear that the threat of individual liability under that law was empty. 

Title VII is defined to include “agents” of an employer as an employer itself, and it was that statutory ambiguity which led individual managers to believe that they were potentially liable for discrimination or harassment under the law.  But in the 1990’s, nearly every court to consider the issue found that Title VII did not create individual liability.  As of now, every federal appellate court to consider the issue has found that there is no individual liability for discrimination or harassment under Title VII (only the First Circuit has not reached that holding).

State courts interpreting state laws generally reached the same holdings.  In California, for example, the courts found that individual employees – whether managers or otherwise – are not liable for discrimination or retaliation under its discrimination law.  But, California departed on the issue of harassment and found that unlike discrimination and retaliation, which involves conduct that is “necessary for performance of a supervisory job,” harassment does not.  As a result, individuals in California can be found liable for harassment under certain circumstances.   Courts in New Jersey and Massachusetts have also opened the door to individual liability for harassment claims.

Aside from those few states, the trend is certainly against individual liability under discrimination statutes. And certainly under Title VII, given the consensus of the appellate courts, the law is not likely to change nor should it make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court for review.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.