A Contract Provision Waiving a Subcontractor’s Rights to Make Bond Claims is Void by Drew W. Colby

more+
less-

In Costa v. Brait Builders Corporation, the highest Court in Massachusetts addressed the question of whether a contract term is void because it precluded a Subcontractor from bringing a payment bond claim on a public project. The Court declared the contract term void and, thus, allowed the Subcontractor to pursue its bond claim. The Court also addressed another contract term concerning the award of attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party that provides guidance to all parties negotiating such terms.

Brait Builders Corporation (“Brait”) included a term in its subcontract that sought to waive the Subcontractor’s right to make a payment bond claim against Brait if the Subcontractor did not provide its own payment and performance bonds (ostensibly for Brait to make claims should the Subcontractor default). The Subcontractor did not provide those bonds, but nevertheless brought a payment bond claim against Brait. Brait moved to dismiss the bond claim reasoning the contract term precluded such claims. The Subcontractor, on the other hand, argued the contract term was void because it violated public policy.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Construction Updates, Government Contracting Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »