A Game Changer For Competitive M&A Transactions? Federal Court Passes Judgment On Bidding Tactics (Australia)

more+
less-

WHAT HAPPENED?

A mining consumables company was sold to a private equity firm. Seven hours later, the company was onsold at a $22 million premium to a competing Australian mining consumables company well known to the private equity firm. The Federal Court found that arrangements between the private equity firm and the ultimate buyer involved cartel conduct in breach of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). The Court awarded the vendor damages equal to the premium paid by the ultimate buyer.

WHY IS THIS RELEVANT TO YOU?

Norcast S.ár.L v Bradken Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 235 is the first case in which the new cartel provisions of the CCA have been applied and highlights the broad application of the bid rigging provisions. In this case, an Australian company and an American private equity firm were found to have breached the CCA in relation to their conduct in a sales process conducted overseas. The decision contains some important lessons for investment banks and private equity firms involved in competitive sale processes.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

DLA Piper on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×