A History Of Massachusetts Anti-SLAPP Legislation As A Vehicle For Protecting First Amendment Petitioning Activity From Retaliatory Defamation Claims

Foley Hoag LLP - Making Your Mark
Contact

A History Of Massachusetts Anti-SLAPP Legislation As A Vehicle For Protecting First Amendment Petitioning Activity From Retaliatory Defamation Claims

Before the passage of anti-SLAPP legislation, citizens engaged in First Amendment petitioning activity often found themselves the targets of retaliatory lawsuits.  For example, a group of neighbors might speak out at a local zoning commission hearing to block approval for a new building development, only to find themselves defending against a costly lawsuit brought by the developer for, among other things, defamation or commercial disparagement.

This December will mark the 20th anniversary of the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute, Chapter 231, Section 59H of the Massachusetts General Laws.  The statute seeks to discourage retaliatory defamation lawsuits and similar claims by providing petitioners the opportunity to file a special motion to dismiss any claim that is based solely on their petitioning the government.  A prevailing petitioner not only get the claims dismissed, but is are also entitled to attorneys’ fees.

Dave Kluft, co-editor of the Trademark and Copyright Law Blog, explores the origins, history and application of the anti-SLAPP statute in this summer’s edition of the Boston Bar Journal.  Dave’s article, entitled, The Scalpel or the Bludgeon? Twenty Years of Anti-SLAPP in Massachusetts, is available here.

- See more at: http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2014/07/anti-slapp/#sthash.o4zH9KTp.dpuf

A History Of Massachusetts Anti-SLAPP Legislation As A Vehicle For Protecting First Amendment Petitioning Activity From Retaliatory Defamation Claims

Before the passage of anti-SLAPP legislation, citizens engaged in First Amendment petitioning activity often found themselves the targets of retaliatory lawsuits.  For example, a group of neighbors might speak out at a local zoning commission hearing to block approval for a new building development, only to find themselves defending against a costly lawsuit brought by the developer for, among other things, defamation or commercial disparagement.

This December will mark the 20th anniversary of the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute, Chapter 231, Section 59H of the Massachusetts General Laws.  The statute seeks to discourage retaliatory defamation lawsuits and similar claims by providing petitioners the opportunity to file a special motion to dismiss any claim that is based solely on their petitioning the government.  A prevailing petitioner not only get the claims dismissed, but is are also entitled to attorneys’ fees.

Dave Kluft, co-editor of the Trademark and Copyright Law Blog, explores the origins, history and application of the anti-SLAPP statute in this summer’s edition of the Boston Bar Journal.  Dave’s article, entitled, The Scalpel or the Bludgeon? Twenty Years of Anti-SLAPP in Massachusetts, is available here.

- See more at: http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2014/07/anti-slapp/#sthash.o4zH9KTp.dpuf

Before the passage of anti-SLAPP legislation, citizens engaged in First Amendment petitioning activity often found themselves the targets of retaliatory lawsuits.  For example, a group of neighbors might speak out at a local zoning commission hearing to block approval for a new building development, only to find themselves defending against a costly lawsuit brought by the developer for, among other things, defamation or commercial disparagement.

This December will mark the 20th anniversary of the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP statute, Chapter 231, Section 59H of the Massachusetts General Laws.  The statute seeks to discourage retaliatory defamation lawsuits and similar claims by providing petitioners the opportunity to file a special motion to dismiss any claim that is based solely on their petitioning the government.  A prevailing petitioner not only get the claims dismissed, but is are also entitled to attorneys’ fees.

Dave Kluft, co-editor of the Trademark and Copyright Law Blog, explores the origins, history and application of the anti-SLAPP statute in this summer’s edition of the Boston Bar Journal.  Dave’s article, entitled, The Scalpel or the Bludgeon? Twenty Years of Anti-SLAPP in Massachusetts, is available here.

 

bz

 

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Making Your Mark
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Foley Hoag LLP - Making Your Mark on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide