A Tax Opinion that Didn’t Carry the Day.

more+
less-

The Fifth Circuit recently applied the economic substance doctrine to a transaction involving foreign currency straddles, sustaining the government’s position.

While the Court’s analysis of the economic substance seems solid, its treatment of the good faith defense to a negligence penalty troubles me a bit. My concern is that the Court apparently views the sufficiency of a tax opinion to be a fact question, even though that requires the application of law (regulations governing the sufficiency of tax opinions) to fact.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Tax

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© James R. Malone, Jr., MALONE LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×