It has become a widely accepted aphorism at public institutions of higher education that judicial deference will be granted to public institutions of higher education to protect schools from unwarranted judicial review of a school's decision to dismiss a student for academic failures. Indeed, the judiciary has consistently held that it will not submit its own judgment in place of a school's academic freedom to decide academic issues. Despite this general platitude, it is also true that students dismissed for academic reasons are due some -modicum of due process,- and schools are forbidden to arbitrarily deprive students of their constitutional rights of equal protection and due process. It is with this conflict in mind that this paper analyzes case law in which academic deference has not been granted by the judiciary. From this discussion, this paper offers a dialogue regarding when academic deference is not an issue.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Education Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Joseph Flanders, Flanders Law Firm LLC | Attorney Advertising