Plaintiff and defendant agreed to terms of a purchase by plaintiff from defendant of two commercial mortgages. Various emails establish an agreed price of $2,200,000, a down payment of $220,000, communications between counsel for each side and between principals from each side agreeing to the terms. Plaintiff signed the agreement and sent it and the down payment, simultaneously advising defendant it had done so, Defendant's principal responded within ten minutes in a positive way, but, alas, the defendant never signed the contract. Importantly, the defendant did not immediately return the down payment, but kept it for a week, and then sold the mortgages to a different party. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to Defendant because the agreement was required to be signed by both parties. The Appellate Division, First Department disagreed, finding that the Defendant's actions were not clearly reliant on a signed contract and that the intention of the parties was a material issue of fact to be determined. The court distinguished Jordan Panel Sys. Corp. v. Turner Constr. Co. 45 A.D.3d 165, upon which two dissenting members of the court relied. Sometimes actions might speak louder than unsigned contracts.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Remedies Updates, Commercial Law & Contracts Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates
State, 2nd Circuit, New York |
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Reuben Ortenberg, Fix Spindelman Brovitz & Goldman, P.C. | Attorney Advertising