Advertising for Dummies: Understanding Robinson Knife Manufacturing Inc. v. Commissioner's Effect on Trademark Licensing and Advertising

more+
less-

This note identifies several problems created by the Tax Court’s holding in Robinson Knife Manufacturing Inc. v. Commissioner, and illustrates the dilemma with the current treatment of trademarks under the Internal Revenue Code.

In particular, this note analyzes: (1) the Robinson case; (2) the Code and Treasury Regulations; (3) and the history of trademark law.

It concludes that the government should strike the word “trademark” from Treasury Regulation section 1.263A-(1)(e)(3)(ii)(U), allowing a deduction for trademark royalties as advertising expenses, pursuant to section 162 of the Code and Revenue Ruling 92-80.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Construction Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, Firm Marketing Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Court Barnett | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »