Advocacy Groups Challenge The Validity Of WTO Ruling On Country Of Origin Labeling In U.S. District Court

more+
less-

[author: Shannon Doyle]

On September 1, 2012, advocacy groups filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado challenging the recent WTO ruling against U.S. statutory provisions and regulations establishing mandatory country of origin labeling (“COOL”) for meat products. The WTO Appellate Body held in United States - Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements that the COOL requirements are inconsistent with the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. The plaintiffs, Made in the USA Foundation, Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers Association, and Melonhead, LLC (a meat and vegetable distributor) have named the United States, the WTO, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, and U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack as defendants in their suit. The complaint is available here.

The plaintiffs argue that the WTO’s ruling is invalid because, under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, conflicts arising between U.S. law and the WTO Appellate Body should be settled according to U.S. law. The plaintiffs also argue that one of the members of the WTO dispute settlement panel that issued the initial ruling on the case had “an obvious conflict of interest” because he is a Mexican national. The plaintiffs are seeking a declaration from the court that the WTO “has no authority to override U.S. law” and that the decision in United States - Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements is invalid. The plaintiffs are also seeking an order instructing Secretary Vilsack to implement and enforce the COOL requirements.

For additional information regarding the COOL requirements and the WTO dispute settlement process, see the August 2012 edition of the Trade and Manufacturing Alert.
 

 

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, General Business Updates, Communications & Media Updates, International Trade Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »