Aegerter v. Oregon Department of Revenue, 11 Or. Tax 399 (1990)

Aegerter v. Oregon Department of Revenue


The Oregon Tax Court held that the losses could be properly deducted if the taxpayer could show that they were engaged in a business for profit. The taxpayers in this case could not show that three of the four lines of products that they sold were businesses for profit, and those expenses could not be deducted. Deductions from a fourth product line were allowed because, although the losses were substantial, the circumstances suggested that the business was operated for profit, and not simply as a hobby. The taxpayers had limited resources, and a job loss precipitated the start of the business. These circumstances suggested a business for profit and not a hobby.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates, Tax Updates

Reference Info:State, 9th Circuit, Oregon | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »

Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline