The Oregon Tax Court held that the losses could be properly deducted if the taxpayer could show that they were engaged in a business for profit. The taxpayers in this case could not show that three of the four lines of products that they sold were businesses for profit, and those expenses could not be deducted. Deductions from a fourth product line were allowed because, although the losses were substantial, the circumstances suggested that the business was operated for profit, and not simply as a hobby. The taxpayers had limited resources, and a job loss precipitated the start of the business. These circumstances suggested a business for profit and not a hobby.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates, Tax Law Updates
State, 9th Circuit, Oregon |
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising