Plaintiff, a real estate brokerage firm, sought brokerage commissions from a corporate lessee and its disclosed individual agents, for services allegedly rendered in a commercial lease transaction. The court below granted a motion to dismiss the complaint against the individuals. The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed, holding that the existing lease and brokerage agreement established the commissions and barred any evidence in the form of subsequent emails and offer sheets generated by the plaintiff broker. The court also held that individual agents for a disclosed principal are not liable for commissions absent clear and explicit evidence of an intention to be so liable. In this case there were apparently some media reports of the activities of the individual defendants, and references to them as partners made by the plaintiff, none of which constituted clear and explicit evidence of an intention by the individuals to be liable for the commissions.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Commercial Law & Contracts Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates
Reference Info:
Decision |
State, 2nd Circuit, New York |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Reuben Ortenberg, Fix Spindelman Brovitz & Goldman, P.C. | Attorney Advertising