AGs Argue for Epic Re-do by Ninth Circuit

Cozen O'Connor
Contact

Cozen O'Connor

  • A bipartisan coalition of 35 AGs filed an amicus brief in support of Epic Games, Inc. in the video game company’s ongoing lawsuit against Apple, Inc., in which Epic alleges that Apple’s iOS App Store practices—which led to the removal of Epic’s flagship video game Fortnite from the App store—violate state and federal antitrust laws and California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL).
  • In April, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment against Epic on the antitrust claims and in favor of Epic on the UCL claim. Both parties are now petitioning the Ninth Circuit for rehearing.
  • The AGs’ brief argues that the Ninth Circuit’s original decision requires rehearing because although the three-judge panel correctly found the lower court failed to balance the anti-competitive and pro-competitive effects of Apple’s conduct, yet erred in finding the lower court’s error was harmless. The AGs also argue that the decision is inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent. More broadly, the AGs argue that Apple’s conduct harms mobile app developers and consumers by monopolizing app distribution and stifling competition, among other things.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Cozen O'Connor on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide