Alabama Boy's Fatal Accident By Electrocution Raises Questions


In 2009, a young boy in Alabama met with what can only be described as a tragic, and sudden, end. While playing in a relative's yard, he ran into the neighboring yard -- which was owned by a commercial entity -- and was accidentally electrocuted. This fatal accident caused ripples of sympathy throughout the community and also spawned a long lawsuit. Now, the wrongful death payout that resulted is causing some questions to be asked.

The crux of the inquiry surrounds how much those parties deemed financially responsible for an Alabama accident should have to pay in these kinds of cases. Currently, there is $100,000 cap, but it only applies to government entities. Therefore, a negligent city employee could be the subject of a court ordered judgment for substantially more.

The boy's fatal accident is pertinent to this discussion of caps because his family sued the city of Montgomery's inspector that was responsible for overseeing electrical elements as they relate to city property. The family claims that the inspector should have known that there were electrical hazards on the air conditioning unit that was located on the outside of the building. This unit was part of the electrical circuit that killed the boy.

Now, the family is proceeding with plans to hold the inspector personally responsible for the tragic accident. Legal representatives for the inspector have countered that the inspector did all he could, and that thieves in search of copper exposed parts of the unit that led to the electrical hazards and, ultimately, the fatal accident. It's now up to a court to decide the personal injury claims. Because there is no cap on the amount the defendants can seek against the city employee personally, he could be ordered to pay a significant sum of money to the family of the boy who died if the court determines that he was negligent in a manner that substantially contributed to the boy's untimely death.

Source:, Lawsuit over boy's 2009 electrocution raises questions over laws, Bethany Wales, March 19, 2014

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Johnston, Moore & Thompson, Huntsville Personal Injury Lawyers | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.