All Ethics Bills are Not Ethics Priorities


In a state where the media is obsessed with the relationship between government officials and campaign contributions, so many more obvious ethics issues with much easier fixes are ignored.

In New Jersey it remains OK for state legislators to make money from towns they represent, but it is not OK for a Mayor or Councilman to also serve in the Legislature.  Dual public service is called, “double dipping,” but legislators can get multiple paychecks from taxpayers as long as only one paycheck is the fruit of elected office.

Unless campaign contributions are involved, bills that attempt to correct some of these obvious anomalies languish in Senate and Assembly committees without media comment or public outcry that they move forward.

Senate Bills 598 and 601 are classic examples. S-598 prohibits a local officer or employee from lobbying or advocating before any municipality where they serve. As detailed in the statement accompanying the bill, it would also amend New Jersey’s Local Government Ethics Law to prohibit a former officer or employee from representing, appearing for, or negotiating on behalf of any party before any local government agency in which the employee served for a period of one year subsequent to the termination of office or employment.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.