The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion yesterday in the closely-watched case, Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. In a decision that is almost certain to affect patent owners as well, the Court unanimously affirmed the Second Circuit’s opinion and ended the speculation of commentators that trademark holders might no longer have the ability to dismiss an invalidity challenge by entering into a covenant not to sue. The Court concluded that an appropriately framed, broad covenant not to enforce a trademark against a competitor moots the competitor’s action to have the trademark declared invalid. The Court imposed a high standard, however, holding that the party issuing the covenant bears a “formidable burden” to establish it is “absolutely clear” the allegedly wrongful conduct cannot reasonably be expected to reoccur.
Nike designs and manufactures a popular line of shoes known as “Air Force 1s.” In the summer of 2009, Nike filed a lawsuit alleging Already’s “Sugars” and “Soulja Boys” shoe lines infringed and diluted Nike’s Air Force 1 trademark. Already filed a counterclaim asking the court to declare Nike’s trademark invalid.
Please full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Already LLC, Covenant Not to Sue, Declaratory Relief, Infringement, Mootness, Nike, Trademarks
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising