U.S. Solartech, Inc. v. j-fiber GmbH

Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial


(Lead counsel: Michael A. Charish, Esq.) SolarTech brought this action against J-Fiber for multiple breaches of a Patent and Technology Information License Agreement, dated May 22, 2003 (the “License Agreement”),

and other wrongful acts. Though no longer affiliated, both parties share a common corporate origin. SolarTech is the successor to a company called FiberCore, Inc. and J-Fiber is the successor to FiberCore Jena AG, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of FiberCore. When FiberCore acquired FC Jena in 1994, it was a small company utilizing virtually obsolete methods and offering outdated products. FiberCore then made extensive investments in FC Jena, developing novel proprietary technology protected as trade secrets and utilizing other confidential intellectual property, such that by 2001, FC Jena had been transformed into a leading fiber company, the second largest in Germany. Recognizing that its business would not be viable if ever it lost the ability to use FiberCore’s intellectual property due to a change in control, FC Jena sought the License Agreement to formalize its rights as a licensee of the FiberCore intellectual property on which its now-successful business came to rely. FiberCore agreed to the arrangement because it assured FiberCore that its intellectual property rights, and the compensation it received for the use of its

intellectual property, would be clearly delineated. FC Jena did in fact undergo a change in control, after FiberCore filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S., FC Jena entered receivership in Germany, and J-Fiber purchased FC Jena’s assets. After reorganization, however, FC Jena and its successor J-Fiber refused to honor the License Agreement and withheld millions of dollars owed to FiberCore and its successor SolarTech. Despite repudiating the License Agreement and refusing to compensate SolarTech,

J-Fiber is now exploiting SolarTech’s intellectual property — including valuable trade secrets — for its own profit.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

Reference Info:Pleadings | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.