Milavetz v. United States

American Bar Association Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners

more+
less-

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.3, the American Bar Association (ABA), as amicus curiae, respectfully submits this brief in support of Petitioner’s challenge to the constitutionality of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), Pub. L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (2005), as applied to lawyers.

The ABA requests that, in determining whether the BAPCPA withstands constitutional scrutiny, the Court consider the substantial negative—and unnecessary— impact of the BAPCPA on state regulation of the legal profession and on the important protections embodied in the attorney-client privilege.

The ABA submits this amicus brief because it believes that the BAPCPA, if applied to attorneys, will improperly and unnecessarily interfere with regulation by state judicial systems of the legal profession and with the ability of attorneys to advise clients in financial distress—an occurrence made all the more common in light of our Nation’s current economic crisis.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Bankruptcy Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

Reference Info:Appellate Brief | Federal, U.S. Supreme Court | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marc S. Stern, Attorneys at Law | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »